@Celticmma77 Obviously merab has a chance, but his path to victory is control time and banking rounds. Petr already he proved he can neutralize Merab’s wrestling/control + deal out damage. Just a matter of if Petr can handle merab’s pace cuz I guarantee merab comes out wrestling hard.
@Fullcourtpass@DraymondShow And wemby will shoot 1/13, get 5 blocks that should’ve been called for goaltending and they’ll say he deserves to be MVP 😭🤣
@Muslimah0_0 You know you’re a wicked liar. It is YOUR Hadiths that say only a child who is not mature can play with dolls. Aisha’s dolls were with her with Muhammad took her as a bride and consummated the marriage. What other lies do you have?
@Muslimah0_0 Mary never had sex 😂 Jesus is born of a virgin. And God received Mary’s permission. Luke 1:38 “And Mary said, ‘Behold, I am the servant of the Lord. May it happen to me according to your word.’ And the angel departed from her.”
@MagomedB01@Her3130 Show me where the text says 32,000 girls were given out for sex? Where does it identify any as 9 years old? You’re inserting claims the text doesn’t make. You don’t know the Bible, you’re a wicked liar and you butcher texts you don’t understand. Yet don’t deny Aisha being raped
@MagomedB01@Her3130 Do you know what cuckold means? You keep using it wrong. I know what black stone kissing pagan means. And I’m glad we agree on the veracity of the Hadiths. So you won’t deny your prophet (piss be upon him) deflowered a 9 year. 👍🏽
@MagomedB01@Her3130 So when Muslims transmit teachings thru generations, it’s preservation, but when Christians do it, it’s fabrication? Irenaeus (180 AD) traced apostolic succession and named Polycarp, taught by the apostles (AH 3.3). Why does your logic validate the Sunnah but discredit the Church
@MagomedB01@Her3130 Your entire religion depends on the Sunnah, preserved through Hadiths compiled CENTURIES after Muhammad. If later religious teachings are automatically “made up,” you’ve just undermined the very foundation of your own religion. 😂 everybody point and laugh at this dumbass
@MagomedB01@Her3130 Your sweeping claim that these Fathers all rejected Nicene theology is too simplistic. Your Irenaeus quote defends the one Creator against Gnostic gods, not a denial of Christ’s divinity. Irenaeus calls BOTH Father and Son God (AH 3.6). Origen did use subordinationist language
@MagomedB01@Her3130 Buddy imma have to send you back to Mecca to kiss the black stone. You keep attacking strawman - you’re arguing against beliefs that the Catholic Church rejects. You aren’t even contending with my arguments. Are you arguing me or the genie in your ear? Or Satan in your nose?
@MagomedB01@Her3130 You’re attacking a straw man. Pre-Nicene ≠ anti-Nicene. Irenaeus says the Son eternally coexists with the Father (AH 2.30.9); Origen teaches eternal generation (Princ. 1.2); Tertullian says Father and Son share one substance (Praxeas 2). Semi-Arianism arose AFTER Nicaea.
@MagomedB01@Her3130 You’re proving my point. Lazarus and others were raised by His power. Christ declared He had authority to lay down His life and take it up again (John 10:18). He died and rose, and will NEVER die again (Romans 6:9). Death couldn’t hold Him. That’s the point of the Resurrection.
@MagomedB01@Her3130 You’re citing PRE-NICENE Church Fathers, before the Church formally clarified Christ’s consubstantial divinity at Nicaea in 325 AD. Yes, some used subordinationist language. But Tertullian affirmed one divine substance, and Novatian called Christ God. Nicaea clarified doctrine,
@MagomedB01@Her3130 You confuse death with annihilation. Christ truly died in His humanity, while His divinity remained immortal. He then rose bodily. Enoch never died (Hebrews 11:5) Stop attacking a doctrine Christianity doesn’t teach. You keep running from the argument like Aisha ran from Muhammad