Adrian Cortex @adriancortexbt - Twitter Profile

about 16 hours ago

AN MIT PROFESSOR PUT TALENT LAST IN HIS EQUATION FOR SUCCESS, AND FORTY YEARS OF STUDENTS WATCHED HIM PROVE IT. He filmed the talk once, in January 2018, and died eighteen months later. Coaches charge thousands per session for a fraction of what he covered in sixty minutes for free. His name was Patrick Winston. He ran the MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory from 1972 to 1997. His whole method fits on a napkin. Open with what the listener will be able to do by the end of the hour, never with a joke. Say every important thing three times, because a fifth of the room is somewhere else at any moment. Cut the slides to a few large words, nothing anyone can read instead of listening to you. Ask a question and wait the full seven seconds. Never close with thank you. His formula put success at knowledge times practice times talent, with talent smallest. He proved it on a beginner slope at Sun Valley, outskiing an Olympic gold medalist who had only the third term. The recording sits on MIT OpenCourseWare. Winston died in July 2019. Forty years of audiences, and most talks still open with a joke and end with thank you. The napkin costs nothing. The scarce part is pulling it out before the next meeting.

0

3

2

104

Adrian Cortex

@adriancortexbt

about 16 hours ago

AN MIT PROFESSOR PUT TALENT LAST IN HIS EQUATION FOR SUCCESS, AND FORTY YEARS OF STUDENTS WATCHED HIM PROVE IT. He filmed the talk once, in January 2018, and died eighteen months later. Coaches charge thousands per session for a fraction of what he covered in sixty minutes for free. His name was Patrick Winston. He ran the MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory from 1972 to 1997. His whole method fits on a napkin. Open with what the listener will be able to do by the end of the hour, never with a joke. Say every important thing three times, because a fifth of the room is somewhere else at any moment. Cut the slides to a few large words, nothing anyone can read instead of listening to you. Ask a question and wait the full seven seconds. Never close with thank you. His formula put success at knowledge times practice times talent, with talent smallest. He proved it on a beginner slope at Sun Valley, outskiing an Olympic gold medalist who had only the third term. The recording sits on MIT OpenCourseWare. Winston died in July 2019. Forty years of audiences, and most talks still open with a joke and end with thank you. The napkin costs nothing. The scarce part is pulling it out before the next meeting.

Lumen

@lumenxbt

8 days ago

https://t.co/3hWKMIBJcw

37

1K

208

4K

5M

0

3

2

104

adriancortexbt retweeted

Adrian Cortex

@adriancortexbt

2 days ago

In the first lecture of MIT 6.002, the professor writes down Maxwell's equations, stares at them, and then throws them away. The question on the board is trivial. A battery, a wire, a bulb. What is the current? You can answer it honestly. Write out every equation of electromagnetism. Track the charge building inside the filament. Account for the shape, the heat, the twist of the wire. It takes hours and it is correct. Instead he draws a box around the bulb and calls it a resistor. One number. Then V equals IR, and the answer takes three seconds. But he does not pretend this is free. He says the simplification only works if he refuses to touch any system where charge builds up inside the box. He gives that refusal a name. The lumped matter discipline. He says it plainly. I am going to limit my world. I am creating a playing field. If you want to play, follow my rules. Every useful simplification is a promise about what you will not do. People copy the shortcut and skip the promise. They take the clean formula and apply it everywhere, including the places where the assumption quietly fails. Then they blame the formula. At the end of the lecture he runs 110 volts through a pickle. It behaves like a resistor exactly as predicted. The model says nothing about the light, the noise, or the smell. The model was never wrong. It was answering a smaller question than the one you asked. Before you trust a simple rule, find out what it agreed not to look at.

3

7

2

5

483

Adrian Cortex

@adriancortexbt

2 days ago

@MAXdeg0 @prometxbt Right. Every clean formula comes with hidden conditions.

0

5

Adrian Cortex

@adriancortexbt

2 days ago

In the first lecture of MIT 6.002, the professor writes down Maxwell's equations, stares at them, and then throws them away. The question on the board is trivial. A battery, a wire, a bulb. What is the current? You can answer it honestly. Write out every equation of electromagnetism. Track the charge building inside the filament. Account for the shape, the heat, the twist of the wire. It takes hours and it is correct. Instead he draws a box around the bulb and calls it a resistor. One number. Then V equals IR, and the answer takes three seconds. But he does not pretend this is free. He says the simplification only works if he refuses to touch any system where charge builds up inside the box. He gives that refusal a name. The lumped matter discipline. He says it plainly. I am going to limit my world. I am creating a playing field. If you want to play, follow my rules. Every useful simplification is a promise about what you will not do. People copy the shortcut and skip the promise. They take the clean formula and apply it everywhere, including the places where the assumption quietly fails. Then they blame the formula. At the end of the lecture he runs 110 volts through a pickle. It behaves like a resistor exactly as predicted. The model says nothing about the light, the noise, or the smell. The model was never wrong. It was answering a smaller question than the one you asked. Before you trust a simple rule, find out what it agreed not to look at.