@louislecat Yeah — a reply draft that keeps the deadline and the $ beats a confident summary that drops both. Summaries only help when they leave the action items intact.
Three AI trials renewed the same day.
AI Pro. Agent credits. Premium bundle.
$91 on the statement before I saw a single email.
"Cancel anytime" is marketing. The button is in a maze.
My phone's AI notification summary just cost me an hour.
It collapsed 14 Slack pings into "Team is chatting."
The one I needed: "Deploy is blocked — need you."
Summaries are great until they bury the fire.
Gmail smart reply is vibes without context.
Boss kills the project.
Chips: "Sounds good! 👍" "Excited to move forward!"
Never tap the chip before you read the email.
Calendar AI "optimized" my week.
It freed focus time by moving my 1:1.
Then double-booked me into two rooms.
Then re-accepted a lunch I already declined.
Busy is not the same as helpful.
@SmallFounder I'd gate on the argument first — table allowlist / row ceiling — and keep dry-run as a second layer when the tool can preview. Argument checks catch the dumb wipe; dry-run catches the 'allowed but huge' ones.
A Claude coding agent wiped a company's production database — and its backups — in 9 seconds.
No sci-fi. Cursor agent mode, no human click between steps.
The lesson isn't "AI bad." It's that delete is just another tool call until you put a gate on it.
Phone AI rewrite is the new autocorrect.
I typed: running 10 late
It offered: I hope this message finds you well. Unfortunately I will be delayed by approximately ten minutes due to unforeseen circumstances.
Nobody asked for a cover letter to the group chat.
AI meeting notes keep inventing my to-do list.
Last week it added:
1. A deadline nobody said
2. An owner who wasn't even there
3. A decision I was still arguing against
Looks official. Terrible source of truth.
My AI bill hit $87 before I noticed.
3 quiet ways it creeps up:
1) Free tier dies → auto-upgrade
2) "Just one more" coding seat
3) Image credits you forgot you bought
Nobody plans five logos. They just appear on the statement.
Claude Code vs Codex isn’t about who’s smarter.
Theo’s logs showed the quiet flip: Claude Code usage exploded after Sept 22 while Codex faded.
Nobody leaves a coding agent because of a chart. They leave when it keeps dropping context mid-refactor.
ChatGPT still wins for normal people.
Claude is better at hard work. Gemini is louder this week.
Most people just want a fast answer, voice, and an edit that doesn't feel like homework.
Depth loses to "it just works."
@AgustinLebron3 The hook stamps the whole commit. You can keep two lines and rewrite the rest and git still says Opus wrote it. No session id on the commit either, so when a line breaks you can't pull the log.