@JamesKowalski88@KingDawah1 "And be not like those who forgot Allah, and He caused them to forget themselves. Those are the rebellious." 59:19
According to you, they really forgot who they are.
Anyway, Consider that he forgot and doesn't forget, simultaneously. Just like being Divine and human !.
@BiblicGrounded Well christians been and continue to cheer for mass killings and genocides so before you turn it into philosophical topic you better explain whether they actually believe what they say.
@JamesKowalski88 Mainstream christianity is basically: the contradictory statements in the bible reflects reality, both are truths. anyone try to reconcile contradictions or affirm one side over the other is heretic.
@JamesKowalski88 - “They will see his face." (Revelation 22:4)
- “The eyes of the Lord are on the righteous.” (1 Peter 3:12)
- “His ears are attentive to their prayer.” (1 Peter 3:12)
- “A voice came from heaven.” (Mark 1:11)
But the biggest of all : “The Word became flesh” (John 1:14).
@JamesKowalski88 He is both fully human and fully divine, without mixture or separation. How ? again, mystery, just like the trinity. You don't get to discuss this topic in the first place.
@corehaven22@Janet_sm145 2/2. Clearly a 9 months unborn is a person. But in early stages it is not, a fertilized egg is not a human being, you don't point at a fertilized egg of a bird and claim there is a bird inside there. It should make sense to discuss when a fertilized egg transform into a human.
@corehaven22@Janet_sm145 1/2. Legal frameworks can assign a legal status to an entity without that entity having this status in ordinary sense. e.g It can treat corporations as persons. So, there is so called context-dependent legal status. Now, the claim is not that every unborn is not a person ...
@StarCrownRW@Janet_sm145 If you mistaken a cat for a human repeatedly, everyone will tell you to seek help. Mistaking a fertilized egg for a human being is worst.
@JamesKowalski88@NaasirOffical The Schacht's theory you are trying to improperly invoke, has already been, largely phased out, among skeptics themselves. try to read !
@JamesKowalski88@RevelationsLost@gandavonmusic Also Zero Jewish texts talks about Jewish their existence around Medina, but you are not claiming that the Quran invented a fight with nonexisting people. If you believe they existed, then tell us their beliefs.
@JamesKowalski88@Kryptotajeer No it doesn't need it, the early Meccan Surahs has zero biblical references. There are arabian stories : Salih and the people of Thamud, Hud and people of 'Ad, and many other narratives with no biblical parallel. Rituals not dependent, most laws and legal rulings.
@JamesKowalski88@Coz_Player - Doctrina Jacobi (c. 634–640)
- Thomas the Presbyter (c. 640)
- Sophronius of Jerusalem (634–638)
- Chronicle of Khuzistan (c. 660)
- Sebeos (c. 660s)
- John bar Penkaye (c. 680s)
- Jacob of Edessa (d. 708)
@JamesKowalski88@Coz_Player What you have are external sources, 60-90 years later after events, those sources 1- do not confirm the details written in Gosples. They confirm Jesus existed, crucified, he had followers, ..etc. The comparable non-muslim sources exists and starts much earlier within 2 years.
@IanBartlet82878@enesovat22 Yes and No. Yes because it is promised to them, No because it is God's work at end of time, Many Jews felt he is too much late and so they did it by themselves. So they need not to interfere with God's work.
@KhalilAndani@muslimorthodoxy By their definitions, a 4-dimensional being is not a body. Yet, spatially extended and can be pointed to. All problems, which didn't have to exist in the first place, solved !
@elonmusk False news. It is exploding in Africa, and the black population in the west will eventually turn white under admixture and evolutionary pressure. Nothing is lost.