This #SupremeCourt judgment authored by Justice BV Nagarathna while quashing POCSO case against a Father should help many such Fathers falsely accused by their wives as part of matrimonial disputes !
Magistrate has power to monitor investigation by police but he cannot interfere in the investigation and cannot restrain the Investigating Officer from summoning a witness u/s179 BNSS. Witness has option to approach the High Court u/s 528 BNSS. See:( 2026) 2SCC 233 (Para 51)
A man was convicted in a murder case of 1983.
The Trial Court convicted him in 1989.
The High Court upheld it in 2022.
The Supreme Court dismissed his SLP in 2023.
After all this, he now approached SC claiming that he was juvenile (15 years) at the time of commission of offence. He had never made this plea before any Courts earlier.
Anyhow, SC has now ordered enquiry.
Why?
Because Juvenile Justice Act allows him to claim it anytime !
The Court held that a promise to marry a woman with a subsisting marriage is void in law and cannot sustain a repeated rape charge under Section 376(2)(n) IPC.
Read more: https://t.co/JspUftTwTT
#SupremeCourt
When a married woman alleges that she was raped by your client on false pretext of marriage, use this #SupremeCourt judgment and get the criminal proceedings quashed !
𝗖.𝗛.𝗔.𝗠.𝗣.𝗜.𝗢.𝗡.𝗦 🏆
Congratulations to India U19 on winning the ICC Men's U19 World Cup 2026 👏👏
Their historic 6⃣th title 🫡
Take. A. Bow 🙇
Scorecard ▶️ https://t.co/hisult7mtv
#U19WorldCup
What happens when a Police Report/Charge Sheet is filed during pendency of a quashing petition? Should the High Court consider that?
#SupremeCourt answers here:
“Bail is the rule and jail is an exception” is etched in the ethos of criminal jurisprudence.
#SupremeCourt reiterates principles under Bail Jurisprudence:
Please share your thoughts on this:
Surendra Koli had allegedly confessed before the Magistrate U/S. 164 CrPC.
Trial Court and High Court and Supreme Court (in 2011) found that this confession as voluntary and reliable.
After his conviction in 2011, Allahabad High Court set aside conviction of accused in other 12 cases holding that the S.164 CrPC confession could not be treated as voluntary or reliable. Supreme Court upheld this acquittal in other 12 cases.
While considering Curative Petition w.r.t 2011 judgment, Supreme Court has essentially relied on these acquittals in other 12 cases.
But we find this quite intriguing !
S.164 CrPC confession was held to be voluntary in 2011 judgment by the Supreme Court.
How did Allahabad HC and later the Supreme Court find the same not to be voluntary in other 12 cases?
Was not the finding on it by Supreme Court in 2011 judgment binding on them ?
The Supreme Court passed an interim order directing the Motor Accident Claims Tribunals and High Courts to not dismiss any motor accident compensation petition as time-barred.
Read moe: https://t.co/rAhaLTyTIa
#SupremeCourt#MotorAccidentClaims#MotorVehicleAct
5 Recent #SupremeCourt judgments on Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act (Cheque Bounce Matters) which you should not miss reading:
1⃣ Sankar Padam Thapa v. Vijaykumar Dineshchandra Agarwal 2025 INSC 1210
2⃣ Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar 2025 INSC 1158
3⃣ Kaveri Plastics v. Mahdoom Bawa Bahrudeen Noorul 2025 INSC 1133
4⃣IDhanasingh Prabhu Vs Chandrasekar 2025 INSC 831
5⃣Celestium Financial vs A. Gnanasekaran 2025 INSC 804
You can read our notes on these judgments and more in https://t.co/iFZhc8LRx1!
Please reply: which of the above you have already read ?