@fieldystick@College_Crosse I have a hard time seeing how they don't get at minimum two at-large berths. Provided no BE/PL/A10 bid steals, smart money is still on 4 ACCs, 2 B1Gs, 1 Ivy, with the last spot likely between a 2nd Ivy (Harvard) and a 3rd B1G (or 5th ACC, if UVA figures it out).
@terpslax1991@danarestia@PremierLacrosse No, he did not play most of last year at attack. He played midfield for the first 12/14 games before moving to attack for the last two due to injuries. Also Leo is not "outproducing" him: Collison has more points per game over the last three years
@terpslax1991@danarestia@PremierLacrosse He averaged more points per game than Leo and Plunkett last year. Palumbo averaged less than half a point per game more in a much better offense. The small differences in production aren't very significant, especially without context
@fieldystick The T5 win over UNC could still be seen as a "differentiator" vs. a 9-6 Cuse team (assuming their ND win is T10 but not T5). But...it's a stretch without those two T20 wins as extra ammo
@fieldystick If UNC loses their next two, and Army loses in the PL tourney, and the final at-large comes down to a UNC team that's like 9 or 10 in RPI vs. an Army team that's ~12, what do you think happens? I realize this is an extreme hypothetical