"Science isn’t some purely neutral, secular tool. It rests on deeply religious assumptions: that truth exists, that it’s knowable, that pursuing it is good, and that the universe makes sense." -- Jordan Peterson
Jordan Peterson made a profound point on Chris Williamson’s podcast.
When God dies, a lot of unexpected things die with Him, including science.
Science isn’t some purely neutral, secular tool. It rests on deeply religious assumptions: that truth exists, that it’s knowable, that pursuing it is good, and that the universe makes sense.
These aren’t scientific claims, they’re metaphysical, rooted in a religious worldview. The universities themselves grew out of monasteries.
Without that deeper foundation, science eventually stops being about truth and becomes just another tool for power, ideology, or convenience. You lose the reason to be honest when the data gets inconvenient.
Do you think science can survive long-term without any belief in objective truth or a higher moral order?
@ErinPerise The one by Daniel Goldstein in which he talks about commitment devices 'A decision that you make with a cool head to bind yourself so that you don't do something regrettable when you have a hot head.' https://t.co/ao14YcarL4
@ericmetaxas This is a great book to know more about him "The Faithful Spy: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the plot to kill Hitler" by John Hendrix @hendrixart
@Playteaux1 Because: "The evidence of near-death experiences points to an afterlife and a universe guided by a vastly loving intelligence."
-- Physician and NDE researcher Jeffrey Long, in 'Evidence of the Afterlife'
@readswithravi Yeah, "We must all suffer from one of two pains: the pain of discipline or the pain of regret. The difference is discipline weighs ounces while regret weighs tons."
-- Jim Rohn