Happy weekend, everyone. ❤️
We’ve posted all the public cases we found this week. Now we’d genuinely like to see some clarity from the firms involved.
@AlphaCapitalUK@QtFunded@EquityEdgeUK@FundedNext@GoatFunded@FunderPro@atlasfunded@upcomers_com
If we got something wrong, correct us.
If there’s evidence we’re missing, show it.
And if the case is already resolved, just tell us what happened.
No drama. No sides.
Just clear answers for the traders involved.
#PropFirm #Trading #Payout #FundedTrader
GIVEAWAY: 5 x $10K Accounts!
To enter:
1️⃣ Follow
@Orionfundedcom@OrionAffiliates@propfirmsupdate
2️⃣ Like ❤️ & Repost 🔁 this tweet
3️⃣ Tag 3 trader friends 👥
4️⃣ Reply with screenshots proving every step is complete 📸
> Complete every step or you won’t be eligible.
🚨 THIS WEEK: 3 QT Funded payout cases still open
@QtFunded@BakeLabVn says his $2,205 payout was rejected for excessive margin. He says he used one position at a time and asked for the actual calculation behind the decision.
@realBull007 says his $500 payout was rejected over high margin. His side says it involved 3 trades and around 1% risk.
@Agent1nk says his $1,000 payout issue has been going on for around 6 months. He says a reset was promised, then the account was breached, and now another 30-day cycle was proposed before reviewing the old payout.
Three traders. Three separate files.
But the question is pretty simple:
What exactly was the calculation behind each decision?
@AlexQuantTekel@JamesQuantTekel
Show the numbers and let the evidence speak.
#QTFunded #PropFirm #Trading #Payout
🚨 QT Funded payout dispute
A trader claims he has been waiting ~6 months for a $1,000 payout.
According to the screenshots, QT Funded says his account was reviewed twice and the breach was confirmed.
The trader then asked for proof of the breach.
QT’s response: “We’re unable to share internal information.”
The trader says he previously completed interviews and was told his account would be reset, but claims the process continued without a clear resolution.
Now he���s asking for one thing: a clear explanation of what rule was breached and why the payout was rejected.
@QTFunded
Claims shown are from the trader and have not been independently verified.
🚨 $1,000 PAYOUT STILL UNPAID AFTER NEARLY 6 MONTHS
This trader waited nearly 6 months for a $1,000 payout from @QtFunded while fully cooperating with the firm requests.
→ Multiple risk interviews were completed
→ An account reset was promised but never delivered
→ The trader was repeatedly directed to DM QT Funded
��� The trader says those DMs were also left unanswered
The trader says QT Funded hasn’t shown the specific trades or rule text that justified the payout denial.
Instead, the firm offered to reactivate the account under a new 30-day trading cycle before reviewing the original payout.
The $1,000 payout remains unpaid.
@PropFirmShinobi@Agent1nk Fraud company bro..my payout pending from 25.6.2026 .. after 3 months they send me breach message without providing any clear reason.. comedy company.. reason is comedy see the attachment
🚨 QT Funded — $1,000 payout dispute
Trader @Agent1nk claims he has been waiting around 6 months for his $1,000 payout.
According to his posts, he completed multiple risk interviews and says he was told his account would be reset.
He later says QT Funded informed him that he had breached the rules.
When @Agent1nk asked for proof of the alleged breach, QT reportedly said they were unable to share the internal information.
He is now asking QT Funded for a clear explanation and evidence behind the decision.
@QTFunded @FinnQTFunded
@PropFirmShinobi@Agent1nk Not just him, they will make you wait for 6 months and reject it without giving a proper reason just like they did to @masterbt2
🚨 QT Funded, 6 months for a $1,000 payout?
@Agent1nk says he’s been waiting around six months for his $1,000 payout.
He says the interviews were done, a reset was promised, and then later he was told he had breached.
He asked them for proof, but says he never got a clear explanation.
And now he’s being told to reactivate the account and trade another 30-day cycle before the payout can even be reviewed.
Six months already.
Now another 30 days?
@QtFunded@PropFirmsGuru
If there was a breach, just show the trader what he did wrong and the rule behind it.
That’s all.
#QTFunded #PropFirm #Trading #Payout
@PropFirmsGuru@propfirmeye@propfirmnation1@QtFunded QT held my payout since nearly half an year made me gave two interviews in second no one showed up was told my ACC will be resetted it wasn’t no one in discord replies properly this is so unprofessional
I mean can anyone be this disrespectful towards their selves @QtFunded made me wait half an year just to give me update about my 1000$ payout made me give interviews told me my account will be resetted then I breached the rules and when I asked for proof they have nothing
🚨 @QtFunded Funded — $1,000 Payout Dispute
A trader @Agent1nk has raised serious concerns regarding his $1,000 payout, claiming he waited approximately six months just to receive an update.
According to the trader, he:
• Participated in multiple interviews during the review
• Was reportedly told that his account would be reset
• Was later informed that his account had breached the rules
• Requested the specific evidence behind the alleged violation
• Claims that no clear supporting evidence was provided
The main concern is simple:
If a payout is being denied because of a rule violation, where is the evidence?
A professional review should clearly explain:
➡️ Which rule was allegedly breached
➡️ When and how the violation occurred
➡️ What evidence supports the decision
➡️ Why the decision changed after the trader was reportedly told his account would be reset
Six months of waiting followed by an alleged breach decision naturally raises questions about the transparency and consistency of the review process.
Traders deserve clear answers when their payouts are under review.