The Prop Truth

The Truth Behind Prop Firms.
News • Investigations • Payout Reports • Transparency

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 $76,656 PAYOUT DISPUTE — RESOLVED

A major payout dispute involving a trader and The5ers has reportedly reached a positive outcome.

The trader @Trillionarie369 had publicly raised concerns over a $76,656.09 payout.

After the case gained significant attention from the trading community, the trader has now confirmed that the full payout was received, along with proof of payment.

💰 $76,656.09 — PAID

This is a good reminder that public transparency can matter when a serious payout dispute arises.

The important part here: the trader got paid, and the case is now closed. ✅
Credit to both sides for bringing the situation to a resolution.

🔎 The Prop Truth

We follow the case. We report the outcome.

#The5ers #PropFirm #Payout #PropTrading #ThePropTruth

[youngest trillionarie @Trillionarie369]

RECEIVED PAYOUT from the @the5erstrading

THANK YOU 🙏 TRADERS 🥹🫂

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

@EquityEdgeUK @berkayglife

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 EQUITY EDGE: ANOTHER PAYOUT DISPUTE NEEDS CLEAR ANSWERS

• @EquityEdgeFunded has rejected a $450.86 performance fee request while approving another withdrawal of $371.98 from the same account.

• The firm’s explanation points to excessive risk exposure and a “Full Porting” violation.

• But several questions remain unanswered:

• Why was the exact trade or setup considered a violation? How much of the daily drawdown was actually at risk? And why was one payout approved while the other was rejected?

• If a rule was breached, show the calculation and supporting trade-level evidence.

Transparency should not be optional when traders’ payouts are at stake.
@berkayglife @EquityEdgeUK

— traders deserve clear answers, not just a violation label.

#EquityEdge #PropFirms #PayoutIssues #TraderRights

[jitendra @jitendra4tmr6]

Equity Edge Funded has rejected my payout due to my huge payout, they have no reason, I have followed all the rules and my account is going into drawdown.

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 EQUITY EDGE: ANOTHER PAYOUT DISPUTE NEEDS CLEAR ANSWERS

• @EquityEdgeFunded has rejected a $450.86 performance fee request while approving another withdrawal of $371.98 from the same account.

• The firm’s explanation points to excessive risk exposure and a “Full Porting” violation.

• But several questions remain unanswered:

• Why was the exact trade or setup considered a violation? How much of the daily drawdown was actually at risk? And why was one payout approved while the other was rejected?

• If a rule was breached, show the calculation and supporting trade-level evidence.

Transparency should not be optional when traders’ payouts are at stake.
@berkayglife @EquityEdgeUK

— traders deserve clear answers, not just a violation label.

#EquityEdge #PropFirms #PayoutIssues #TraderRights

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

@GoatFunded @EdwardXLreal @NazGFT

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 PAID FOR 3 ACCOUNTS, RECEIVED ONLY 2 — $644.90 MISSING With @GoatFunded

• A trader @Underwater200K has publicly raised a payment and account delivery dispute with Goat Funded Trader.

According to the trader :

• Three separate payments of $644.90 were made on November 5, 2026.

• Only two account resets were delivered.
The third payment was successfully charged, but no account was generated.

• The missing $644.90 has reportedly not been refunded.
Support has allegedly failed to address the specific missing transaction.

• He is requesting either delivery of the missing account or a full refund.

The question is simple: Where did the third payment go?
@GoatFunded @NazGFT @EdwardXLreal
#PropFirm #Forex

[Burkay Özkaynak @Underwater200K]

Dear Goat Funded Trader Support Team,

@GoatFunded @NazGFT @HafeezGFT @Sammy_GFT @imitini

I am contacting you to formally escalate an unresolved payment and account delivery issue that your support team has repeatedly failed to understand or properly investigate.

I MADE THREE SEPARATE PAYMENTS FOR THREE ACCOUNT RESETS. HOWEVER, I RECEIVED ONLY TWO ACCOUNTS. THE THIRD PAYMENT WAS CHARGED SUCCESSFULLY, BUT NO ACCOUNT WAS DELIVERED.

On November 5, 2026, I made three separate payments of $644.90 USD each for account resets through Goat Funded Trader.

The transaction details are as follows:

PAYMENT 1 – MISSING ACCOUNT

Date: November 5, 2026
Bank transaction time: 19:23 (Türkiye time)
Amount: $644.90 USD
Merchant: goatfundedtrader
WebPOS Transaction Number: 102327
Authorization/Provision Number: 127922
Status: PAYMENT CHARGED – NO ACCOUNT DELIVERED
Order History: NOT VISIBLE
Refund: NOT RECEIVED

PAYMENT 2 – ACCOUNT DELIVERED

Date: November 5, 2026
Bank transaction time: 19:36 (Türkiye time)
Amount: $644.90 USD
WebPOS Transaction Number: 102407
Authorization/Provision Number: 267584
Status: ACCOUNT DELIVERED
Order History: VISIBLE

PAYMENT 3 – ACCOUNT DELIVERED

Date: November 5, 2026
Bank transaction time: 19:38 (Türkiye time)
Amount: $644.90 USD
WebPOS Transaction Number: 102456
Authorization/Provision Number: 731858
Status: ACCOUNT DELIVERED
Order History: VISIBLE

TOTAL AMOUNT CHARGED: $1,934.70 USD
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID FOR: 3
TOTAL ACCOUNTS DELIVERED: 2
MISSING ACCOUNT VALUE: $644.90 USD

Let me make this absolutely clear:

I am NOT disputing the delivery of the two accounts. I acknowledge that those two accounts were successfully delivered.

MY COMPLAINT CONCERNS THE THIRD, SEPARATE PAYMENT MADE AT 19:23, FOR WHICH NO ACCOUNT WAS DELIVERED AND NO ORDER APPEARS IN MY DASHBOARD.

Your support representatives repeatedly respond by stating that two accounts have been delivered. This response is completely irrelevant to the missing third transaction.

I already know that two accounts were delivered. The issue is that I PAID FOR THREE.

The missing transaction does not even appear in my Goat Funded Trader purchase history, despite the money being charged to my bank account. No refund has been received.

I have attached all three official bank receipts showing the separate payments, transaction numbers, authorization numbers, dates, and amounts.

I am requesting the following:

Escalate this case immediately to your Billing/Payments Department, not merely general customer support.
Investigate the missing WebPOS transaction number 102327, authorization number 127922, dated November 5, 2026, at 19:23 Türkiye time.
Reconcile this payment with your payment processor’s records, including any transaction that was charged but failed to generate an order.
Either deliver the missing account reset that I paid for or issue a full refund of $644.90 USD.
Provide a clear written explanation regarding the missing transaction and its resolution.

PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND AGAIN BY SAYING THAT TWO ACCOUNTS HAVE BEEN DELIVERED. THAT IS NOT THE DISPUTE.

The dispute is about the THIRD PAYMENT, which has not resulted in any account delivery or refund.

This is a straightforward financial reconciliation issue. I expect your billing team to investigate the actual transaction records instead of repeatedly providing an answer that ignores the evidence.

Please provide a substantive response and resolution within 48 hours. If this matter remains unresolved, I will consider escalating the disputed charge through my bank’s formal dispute process.

I expect a professional response that specifically addresses the missing payment at 19:23.

Best regards,

Burkay Özkaynak

Attachments: Three official Enpara bank payment receipts dated November 5, 2026.

#PropFirm #forex

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 PAID FOR 3 ACCOUNTS, RECEIVED ONLY 2 — $644.90 MISSING With @GoatFunded

• A trader @Underwater200K has publicly raised a payment and account delivery dispute with Goat Funded Trader.

According to the trader :

• Three separate payments of $644.90 were made on November 5, 2026.

• Only two account resets were delivered.
The third payment was successfully charged, but no account was generated.

• The missing $644.90 has reportedly not been refunded.
Support has allegedly failed to address the specific missing transaction.

• He is requesting either delivery of the missing account or a full refund.

The question is simple: Where did the third payment go?
@GoatFunded @NazGFT @EdwardXLreal
#PropFirm #Forex

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

@WolfyyFx Check dm

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

@EvercrestFunds Check dm

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

@Mealseey @FundedNair8 @TradeWithSponge @RoguePips_ Check dm

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

@BlueGuardiancom @GuardianFutures @seanbaint

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 $10K Payout Request Still Unavailable at Blue Guardian?

• Another trader has raised concerns about the payout process at @BlueGuardiancom.

• @BrandonMangan3 claims he has been unable to submit his $10,000 payout request for more than two weeks.

• According to him, the payout option remained unavailable, and support continued to say that the technical team was investigating the issue.

• However, he says there has been no confirmed fix or meaningful update so far.

• He also reports that other traders in the Blue Guardian Discord are facing similar difficulties.

Blue Guardian needs to address these concerns and provide traders with a clear explanation.@GuardianFutures @seanbaint

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 $10K Payout Request Still Unavailable at Blue Guardian?

• Another trader has raised concerns about the payout process at @BlueGuardiancom.

• @BrandonMangan3 claims he has been unable to submit his $10,000 payout request for more than two weeks.

• According to him, the payout option remained unavailable, and support continued to say that the technical team was investigating the issue.

• However, he says there has been no confirmed fix or meaningful update so far.

• He also reports that other traders in the Blue Guardian Discord are facing similar difficulties.

Blue Guardian needs to address these concerns and provide traders with a clear explanation.@GuardianFutures @seanbaint

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

@Ram1068040 @tradeifyforex @TOUSEEFGUJJAR0 What is the benefits of the account if they are denying payouts without solid reasons

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 $6,465 PAYOUT DENIED OVER CROSS-FIRM HEDGING ALLEGATIONS

• @tradeifyforex has denied a trader’s $6,465 payout and terminated the account, citing alleged cross-firm hedging.

• However, the evidence presented raises serious questions.

According to the trader @TOUSEEFGUJJAR0 -

• TradeifyFX: 1.5 lots SELL on XAUUSD, generating $4,398 profit.Other firm: 1.4 lots BUY, resulting in combined losses of approximately $4,260.

• TradeifyFX stop-loss risk: $1,000.
The trader questions why anyone would risk approximately $4,260 on another firm to hedge a position carrying just $1,000 in risk.

• Instead of providing convincing evidence explaining the alleged violation, the firm has reportedly denied the payout.

• A $6,465 payout is at stake. Traders deserve clear explanations and transparent investigations, not unanswered questions.
@tradeifyforex @BrettSimba

[TOUSEEF GUJJAR @TOUSEEFGUJJAR0]

@tradeifyforex has denied my $6,465 payout based on allegations of cross-firm hedging, failed to provide any convincing evidence, and subsequently terminated my account.

When I requested proof, they simply presented two trades allegedly taken on another firm in the opposite direction to my TradeifyFX position, without providing any meaningful context or explaining how this supposedly constituted a violation.

Let’s look at the actual numbers:

* TradeifyFX: 1.5 lots SELL on XAUUSD, generating a profit of $4,398.
* Other firm: 0.7 lots BUY + 0.7 lots BUY (1.4 lots total), resulting in losses of $2,076.90 and $2,183.30.
* My TradeifyFX stop loss: $1,000 (1% risk).

Now, here’s my question: Which prop firm allows traders to take such massive risks on a master account in the first place? Most firms have strict 1–2% risk limits on master accounts. Are we seriously expected to believe that someone would deliberately risk approximately $4,260 on another firm to hedge a position with a $1,000 stop loss on TradeifyFX?

The numbers simply don’t add up. This entire allegation is absolute bullshit.

Instead of conducting a transparent investigation and providing legitimate evidence, TradeifyFX chose to deny my $6,465 payout and terminate my account.

I genuinely did not expect this kind of treatment from a firm of their reputation, especially at such an early stage of their journey.

If firms are already resorting to questionable practices when dealing with profitable traders, it raises serious concerns about the future of this entire industry.

And finally, to TradeifyFX:

Keep your “Milk Us” campaign. The only thing you’re milking here is your traders’ patience and trust.

You can spend all the money you want advertising “Milk Us” everywhere, but perhaps you should focus on paying traders instead of finding excuses to deny their payouts.

I DEMAND MY $6,465 PAYOUT.

This represents my hard work, countless hours, and time invested in trading. I have earned this payout, and I expect to be treated fairly.

Other traders are receiving their payouts, so why am I being treated differently? Is it because I’m from a third-world country like Pakistan? Do you believe you can simply make baseless allegations, withhold my earnings, and close my account because you think I have no power to challenge you?

Being from a developing country does not make my hard work, my time, or my earnings any less valuable. I deserve the same fair treatment as every other trader.

This is unacceptable, and I will continue demanding what I rightfully earned.

PAY MY $6,465.
@propfirmeye @PropFirmMedia @Propfirmedge @PropFirmsScams @propfirms @Limitless_Noman @Sai_Prasan @Ye_FTM @seanbaint @Khldfx @avikkfp @BrettSimba @Abdullahfxx

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

@JeniferGomezNYS @NYSMarkets @Musab_Ab Posting on your side won’t achieve anything. Review his case transparently and provide a clear explanation.

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 ONE DAY BEFORE PAYOUT, NYSMARKETS TERMINATES ACCOUNT

• Another concerning case involving @NYSMarkets.

• Trader @Musab_ab claims his account was breached just one day before becoming eligible for a payout.

• Initially, the firm cited a violation of its 2% risk rule. However, after submitting evidence and requesting a review, the trader claims the investigation showed he had NOT breached that limit.

• Yet, a different rule was subsequently used to justify the account breach.

• This raises serious questions about consistency and transparency in rule enforcement.

• Why did the reason for the breach change after the trader challenged the initial decision?

@NYSMarkets, traders deserve a clear explanation backed by evidence.

Fair rules mean nothing without fair and consistent enforcement.
@NYSMarkets @pakothawani

[MUS’AB AG @Musab__ag]

🚨 I AM REQUESTING FAIRNESS AND TRANSPARENCY ! @NYSMarkets

How can a trader work hard 😓 day and night one day left to request payout and breach my account with no standard reason !

Here is all proof they breach my account. They said am exceed the max 2% rules.
I contact they support and send them the details to review after they finish reviewing they seeing am not exceeding that

They charge me on other rule apart which they not apply it

PLEASE I DESERVE JUSTICE 🙏

#PropFirm #fundedTraders #ForexTrading

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

@juantraderrrrr @tradeifyforex @TOUSEEFGUJJAR0 Are you saw there spreads ? 😧

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

@NYSMarkets @pakothawani

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 ONE DAY BEFORE PAYOUT, NYSMARKETS TERMINATES ACCOUNT

• Another concerning case involving @NYSMarkets.

• Trader @Musab_ab claims his account was breached just one day before becoming eligible for a payout.

• Initially, the firm cited a violation of its 2% risk rule. However, after submitting evidence and requesting a review, the trader claims the investigation showed he had NOT breached that limit.

• Yet, a different rule was subsequently used to justify the account breach.

• This raises serious questions about consistency and transparency in rule enforcement.

• Why did the reason for the breach change after the trader challenged the initial decision?

@NYSMarkets, traders deserve a clear explanation backed by evidence.

Fair rules mean nothing without fair and consistent enforcement.
@NYSMarkets @pakothawani

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

@tradeifyforex @BrettSimba

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 $6,465 PAYOUT DENIED OVER CROSS-FIRM HEDGING ALLEGATIONS

• @tradeifyforex has denied a trader’s $6,465 payout and terminated the account, citing alleged cross-firm hedging.

• However, the evidence presented raises serious questions.

According to the trader @TOUSEEFGUJJAR0 -

• TradeifyFX: 1.5 lots SELL on XAUUSD, generating $4,398 profit.Other firm: 1.4 lots BUY, resulting in combined losses of approximately $4,260.

• TradeifyFX stop-loss risk: $1,000.
The trader questions why anyone would risk approximately $4,260 on another firm to hedge a position carrying just $1,000 in risk.

• Instead of providing convincing evidence explaining the alleged violation, the firm has reportedly denied the payout.

• A $6,465 payout is at stake. Traders deserve clear explanations and transparent investigations, not unanswered questions.
@tradeifyforex @BrettSimba