🚨 Goat Funded Trader Denying Payouts!
As usual, same allegation “copy trading” which cannot be proved.
@EdwardXLreal@GoatFunded with this attitude and such behaviour your firm won’t last long within giants like tradify and FTM
Thank you @GoatFunded@EdwardXLreal@NazGFT and your risk team for denying my payout and closing my $100k instant premium account. Reason: copy trading.
I am not here to try and defend myself or prove anything to you, neither did I reply the email because I know it’s pointless.
🚨 @AlphaCapitalUK & unexplained CID cases 🚨
A lot of users are reporting unexplained and unjustified CID cases by @AlphaCapitalUK.
They’re rejecting bigger payouts and then banning the traders over CID violations.
This shall be stopped and answered @AlphaCapitalUK
#alphacapital #propfirms
🚨 We’re not against any Prop-firm!
Be it any firm, we’re not against them. We’re against the unjustified breaches or payout denials.
We want this prop firm community to be fair n square.
We’re not affiliates with any firm or anything.
Any firm that does wrong we’ll definitely post against them.
How can you ban a trader based on one side of the story without hearing their explanation?
I’m asking for a fair review,not special treatment. Please traders, help me raise my voice and get this issue noticed🙏 @fundedsquad#FundedSquad#PropFirm@PropFirmsScams@proptraderSPT
@fxnitin031@fundingpips@Khldfx Either they paid you some money to remove your posts or they unbanned you. Its funny you kept posting against it and now changed your words 360.
Shameful man.
🚨 CID, IP MATCH & COPY TRADING: THE NEW PAYOUT DENIAL LOOP?
• A trader passes the challenge, reaches the payout stage, and suddenly faces allegations of copy trading, coordinated trading, or an IP/CID match.
• Some prop firms reject payouts based on these flags without publicly presenting clear, verifiable evidence.
• If a violation occurred, prove it. If the system flagged the wrong trader, investigate it fairly.
A suspicion should trigger an investigation—not automatically become a reason to deny hard-earned payouts
#PropFirms #ThePropTruth
🚨 FundingPips Breached $300,000 for this trader as well as denied $4000 payout.
KYC had been previously done with some approved payouts. Recently they asked for KYC again.
The trader submitted however they later banned the trader saying the documents were altered.
@avikkfp@Khldfx traders deserve to be treated with respect. This is not about asking for special treatment rather to look into things properly.
#propfirms #fundingpips
🚨 PUBLIC DISPUTE WITH FUNDINGPIPS — $300,000 IN FUNDED ACCOUNTS TERMINATED & $4,000 PAYOUT WITHHELD
I am making this situation public after repeatedly attempting to resolve it privately with @fundingpips.
I believe the trading community deserves to know what happened, and I am requesting a transparent explanation from FundingPips.
Here are the documented facts from my side:
1. KYC APPROVED OVER 6 MONTHS AGO
I completed the required identity verification process more than six months ago.
My documents were submitted, reviewed, and approved by FundingPips.
At no point during that process was I informed of any irregularity or issue with my documentation.
2. PREVIOUS PAYOUT APPROVED
Following my successful KYC verification, I continued trading with FundingPips.
I received an approved payout.
This is an important detail: FundingPips had already verified my identity and subsequently processed a payout under that verification.
3. $300,000 IN FUNDED ACCOUNTS TERMINATED
Today i received an email from them for closing all of my accounts while i have three funded accounts of $100,000 each.
One of these accounts had a $4,000 which would be eligible in 1 week from now
I then received an email informing me that my accounts were being terminated due to an allegation that my KYC documentation had been altered.
I categorically dispute this allegation.
All three funded accounts were closed, the account with 4000$ in profits also closed , and I was prohibited from purchasing further accounts.
4. REPEATED REQUESTS FOR EVIDENCE — NO SUBSTANTIATION PROVIDED
Since receiving this accusation, I have contacted FundingPips more than 10 times requesting clarification and supporting evidence.
Specifically, I have asked:
- Which document was allegedly altered?
- What specific alteration was identified?
- Why was the same KYC previously approved?
- Why was a subsequent payout approved?
- What evidence supports the decision to terminate all my accounts and withhold my payout?
As of this post, I have not received the requested evidence or a substantive explanation addressing these questions.
5. MY POSITION
I fully understand that prop firms must enforce KYC and anti-fraud policies.
However, serious allegations involving document falsification should be supported by identifiable evidence and a transparent review process.
A trader who has passed verification, received a previous payout, and accumulated $300,000 in funded allocation should not be left without a meaningful explanation when all accounts are suddenly terminated.
I am not asking for special treatment.
I am asking for evidence, transparency, and a fair review.
6. MY REQUEST TO FUNDINGPIPS
I publicly request that FundingPips:
1. Identify the specific document and alleged alteration.
2. Explain why the documentation was previously approved.
3. Provide the contractual basis for terminating my accounts and withholding the pending payout.
4. Conduct a formal review of the decision.
5. Reinstate my accounts and release the $4,000 payout if the allegation cannot be substantiated and no other valid grounds for withholding exist.
I am prepared to provide my KYC approval confirmation, previous payout records, account information, termination notice, and correspondence to an independent reviewer, with sensitive personal information appropriately protected.
This is no longer simply about a $4,000 payout. It is about transparency, accountability, and whether traders can reasonably rely on a firm's verification and dispute-resolution procedures.
I welcome a direct, documented response from @fundingpips.
I also invite independent prop-firm reviewers and industry journalists to examine the available evidence and report on the outcome.
If you believe traders deserve clear explanations when accounts and payouts are terminated, please share this post so the matter can receive a fair review.
#FundingPips #PropTrading #FundedTrader #TradingTransparency
@Limitless_Noman@fundingpips@ErkanOriginal@Khldfx Appreciate it, however what about reverse trade bans? They have 50M traders so it is very possible that while one opens buy and the other open sells at the same time. They may not be cheating and trading independently.
In this scenario they’re still getting banned.