@Nick140049@robnoerr@RealCandaceO If she's not making claims, she is incapable of being correct. For example, "I don't know how that guy got murdered" what would I be correct about, that I don't know? π
@Deb_Unfiltered@paleochristcon Hey, I'll be totally fair. If she hasn't made any alternative claims whatsoever then fine. But the state has made claims, has backed them up with evidence. So until she's willing to do the same, seems like TR is the best suspect we have.
@Nick140049@robnoerr@RealCandaceO So she claims, that compared to the evidence of the state against Tyler Robinson, her evidence is overwhelming and theirs is underwhelming? Sounds like a claim to me
@Deb_Unfiltered@paleochristcon Even If that's true, that means she is just using hearsay to continue making money of, supposedly, her friends death. A year of investigation and no claims? Really?
@R7785Reddis@KanekoaTheGreat@paleochristcon In those 3 pictures above, there is literally not 1 question. Saying "our military was involved in the Kirk assassination" is literally a claim. You people π
All evening the Candace Owens people have been saying she makes no claims so she doesnβt have to defend any.
They claim I said there was overwhelming evidence for the prosecution of Robinson which is true I said that so I meed to defend it .
However, Candace did make a reverse claim. She said there is overwhelming evidence Robinson was set up by the feds as a patsy.
So I will take the position that the evidence is more compelling that Tyler was a lone shooter not set up by the feds. She takes the position of her claim, which she says has overwhelming evidence he was a patsy put there by the feds. If she agrees, then we are all set.
How the hell can anybody argue against me here? We both made claims. We both defend them.
@RealCandaceO Do you agree to be cross examined on your alternative theories/claims Candace? If your so confident in them it should be a no brainer. If you refuse that shows you can't back up any of your alternative theory claims
@SenseCertain@paleochristcon This I agree with, Candace will simply do the "but did he though" argument without making any claims, it's just conspiracy theory grifting crap. Have some stones and make a claim, or shut up.
@SenseCertain@paleochristcon She has claimed that tpusa betrayed Charlie and that members of tpusa were involved in his murder, what are you talking about.
@unmuzzledME@paleochristcon She actively claims there was a conspiracy and that Israel/Erika/tpusa did it. That claim is a serious one and she should be willing to have those claims cross examined. If she isn't, that probably means she knows it's all nonsense.