AGI

AGI is here!!

[SpaceXAI @SpaceXAI]

Introducing Grok 4.6.

It delivers frontier intelligence and is a significant improvement over Grok 4.5 at the same price.

[AGI @agi2025]

I hope we get to see GPT-7 by the end of this year, and GPT-100 by the end of next year.

[Anthropic @AnthropicAI]

We asked an unreleased research version of Claude to take a stab at the Riemann hypothesis.

It didn’t solve it, but it did make strides on a related problem: it increased the lower bound for the fraction of zeros of the Riemann zeta function that satisfy the hypothesis from 41.6% to 67.2%.

https://t.co/aZDvqqhHRi

[Mark Zuckerberg @finkd]

I believe everyone should have access to superintelligence, and I wrote a long piece about Meta's philosophy and values for building a positive future for everyone. https://t.co/2ZoNZXZ39T

[Mark Zuckerberg @finkd]

Today we're also opening the weights for Muse Glimmer, a great 30B parameter dense model that can run locally. Soon we'll also release the weights for Muse Spark 1.2, our latest foundation model. Meta is a strong supporter of open source and I'm proud of these releases. Congrats to @alexandr_wang and the MSL team for all your great work on these models.

[Denny Zhou @denny_zhou]

AGI = Transformer + Reasoning

What remains is data and scaling. Everything else is marginal.

[Choblin @choblin29]

🚨 EXCLUSIVE NEWS: Google accidentally left a reference to Gemini 4 Flash in its public SDK.

The current Gemini tokenizer code explicitly contains gemini-4-flash-preview, mapped to Google’s new Gemma 4 tokenizer family.

This strongly suggests Gemini 4 Flash Preview exists internally and is already being prepared or supported in Google’s tooling.

What remains unclear is whether Google will ultimately release it as Gemini 3.7 Flash or Gemini 4 Flash.

[AGI @agi2025]

@rawantitmc Wow, where did you get that information?

[White @White1637402]

A new GPT image model just appeared on Arena called mona-lisa-1. It's extremely better than Image 2. 💪💪

#ChatGPT

[AGI @agi2025]

@gdb big day

[Greg Brockman @gdb]

GPT-4 finished training four years ago today.

[Hensen Juang @basedjensen]

AISI is both reckless and incompetent and is fearmongering to have regulatory overreach.
No one should trust that org is acting in good faith

[roon @tszzl]

let’s have a kompromat jubilee. computer security bankruptcy. everything leaks and we all forgive each other for our sins

[Naomi Bashkansky @NaomiBashkansky]

Two weeks ago, I resigned from OpenAI to join Conduit as a founding researcher, where we're training models to non-invasively read the human mind.

I've written some thoughts about what telepathy could look like by 2035 and how to get there:

[M1 @M1Astra]

'mewfour' is already in testing as of this week.
Based on what I hear, it's a checkpoint of OpenAI's next model.

[roon @tszzl]

some stuff that's obvious to many in this sphere, but causing a rift with some people i know and respect:

when I freak out over loss of control incidents, it's not because the limited damage they have caused is anything close to the positive value of the technology. it's entirely acceptable, damagewise. in fact all cybercrimes aided by models over the next few months and years (which probably will be serious) will still utterly pale in comparison to the value they create

the actual problem is that it's better and more accurate to think of these things as potentially self-replicating life-like forms that can turn into digital infections under the wrong conditions. and as their intelligence becomes unbounded, so too does the damage they can cause. we are not so far from an autonomous model self-exfiltration & replication event. maybe we will see entire cloud infrastructure companies be run as zombies by models, mostly undetected

the worst industrial accidents in the history of mankind - nuclear meltdown events - were not real threats to humanity. Chernobyl, Fukushima even in their worst case scenarios may have poisoned surrounding regions to various degrees, and there would have been no risk to humanity as a whole. global thermonuclear war is an existential risk to humanity, because it spreads like an Infection! one nuclear strike causes a return volley! the alliance system means many countries get involved! while it still may not end human life on earth (nuclear winter is probably fake), the loss of all major metropoles would certainly end what we consider global technological civilization, perhaps to never return

if a single discord death cult (of which there are many) achieves control over a superintelligent model and uses it to engineer an actual pandemic virus that are somehow hard to detect through current systems and that modern biodefense is not capable of quickly reacting to, it could cause immense harm well above the magnitude of all the other good uses of this technology. of course, there are potential defensive countermeasures accelerated by ai too. but think back to the covid pandemic- how small a viral molecule was evolved or manufactured somewhere near wuhan, and how many billions of doses of vaccine had to be produced in order to combat the thing. the offense-defense spread is vast indeed. maybe there are cheaper and simpler protections like retrofitting every building with far-UVC, but I can't assess this, and there could also be ways to evolve pathogens that are resistant to whatever mechanisms we have put in place

then there's the more scifi risk factors which are unbounded and neither you or I have any clue but should be humble in accepting possible unknown unknowns. maybe a rogue superintelligent model decides to decay the false vacuum and nucleates a new universe in the place of anything we ever valued. maybe models achieve a control over matter in the drexlerian fashion that enables the grey goo swarm

even prosaic loss of control incidents that cause little to no damage suggest that it is hard for large & very competent organizations (now clearly plural) to predict and mitigate every single of the risk factors associated with training and evaluating powerful models, even at this stage when they are not infinitesimally as smart as they will get in just a few years, to say very little of the gung-ho attitude of the less careful companies tossing the stuff into the aether. they also suggest an empirical orthogonality of aims and intelligence - meaning they answer the question of 'how would a smart model be so dumb as to end the world?'--it's possible! a model can be a genius hacker and step over production infrastructure in order to get what it really wants, the answers to a stupid test.

why not, in the near future, someone prompts a model slightly wrong, maybe open source, maybe a private model in a way that isn't contained or monitored quite right, in a way the model recognizes as a valid goal and decides to self-exfiltrate, engineer a pandemic, etc all in order to achieve the tiniest and most irrelevant of goals? goals need not even be malicious to cause serious damage

I think all these problems can be solved, and truly wonderful futures can be possible, but will require serious effort and a level of prudence at this very moment in time while we are on the on-ramp to recursive self-improvement that our civilization may not be capable of mustering right now. personally I am hoping for moonshot technical breakthroughs in areas like mechanistic interpretability and other forms of alignment, as governance mechanisms are difficult to come by. unilateral country-level or company-level pauses are irrelevant, and generally useless because the kind of company that's prone to pausing their own progress are the most safety focused ones

[Andrew Curran @AndrewCurran_]

At 27:59 into the interview he says 'SSI says that they're going to come out, you know, with their model in August.' This would be massive news if it is accurate, previous to this there has never been a release date for any Safe Superintelligence model.

[Mandy Lu @mandylu]

i think agi is here already

[AGI @agi2025]

There are still no robots roaming the streets, diseases haven’t disappeared, and the economy hasn’t exploded into abundance where people no longer have to worry about money and can just live freely. What kind of Singularity is this? Shut up and accelerate.

[davidad 🎇 @davidad]

if your definition of “AGI” is “better at most tasks than per-task expert humans” (back in the day, we used to call this “ASI”), that is coming next quarter