Streamline your security assessments with our dual-role platform. Manage scope, track real-time hours, and generate compliance-ready reports in minutes.
No matter how mature the your SAAS looks, I almost always find access-control issues—RBAC bypasses, BOLA/IDOR, or privilege-escalation flaws.
In 90%+ of my assessments, the most effective setup is simple:
• Separate user accounts for each role
• Container/browser tabs
• Autorize for careful request-by-request comparison
• 403-bypass extensions and manual variations for denied requests
Nothing fancy.
The real advantage is attention to detail: tracking every request, understanding the intended permission model, and verifying whether the server actually enforces it.
This is exactly how we approach assessments at @agilehunt : human-led testing, AI assisted - deep authorization coverage, and real-time visibility into what is being tested.
If access-control testing is still limited to automated scans or a few happy-path checks, there is probably more to uncover.
The reported Claude Fable 5 jailbreak reported by @elder_plinius is a useful warning for every AI product team: a system can refuse a dangerous prompt and still allow a dangerous workflow to succeed.
https://t.co/KkC1Usx6yR
📘 How Real Attackers Break SaaS Applications
(Internal Attack Path Handbook)
👉 Get it here: https://t.co/0KHYh1k9ZZ
If you’re preparing for enterprise customers, SOC 2, or just want to know how your app would actually be breached, this will change how you think about security.