I gave Fable 5.2 a script about the part of building alone you don’t see in revenue screenshots.
The empty dashboard. The silence after launch. The first stranger who pays $9.
Made with Claude Motion.
@alexmichael Now I want to see the follow-up prompt: same scene, different camera angle. How well does it keep everything consistent when you start making changes?
Fable 5.2 is here. My first test would be a bug Opus keeps going in circles on.
Same repo. Same context. No extra hints.
I want to see whether switching models gets it unstuck.
Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2, designed to tackle the most daunting technical challenges.
They’re capable collaborators on ambitious projects in many fields, and show improvements in areas like coding, reasoning, and vision.
@Wv3EcACHtizRjZK Starting with a messy example makes sense. Do you put that into the first prompt, or get a rough layout down and then test it with awkward content?
When you ask Claude to design a screen, how much have you decided before the first prompt?
A rough layout? Screenshots? Just the job the screen needs to do?
Curious what people start with.
One thing I want Claude Code or Codex to explain before changing a flow:
What happens if I tap twice, lose connection, or leave halfway through?
The happy path gets enough attention.
Has anyone here shared their app on Reddit and had it go well?
Which community was it, and how did you introduce it?
Curious where people actually welcome something you've made.
@BreejeAnadkat This is where I like splitting the work: Claude for implementation, then Codex with computer use to click through the UI. A nice demo can still hide an awkward flow.
@pmitu I've used AI for Tryoom's social content. It helps me make the assets, but I still have to work out who they're for and why that person would care. That part needs more thought than the generation.
Would you finish 60 screens of onboarding for an app?
My first reaction is no. Then I wonder if I've just never wanted the result badly enough.
What's the longest onboarding you've willingly sat through?
What would make you pay $50/month for an AI tool?
More usage, a better model, or fewer interruptions while you're working?
I'd be interested to see how different the answers are for chatting vs coding.
@progerallworld Yeah, being able to say 'fix the desk, leave everything else alone' is the part I'd want to test. Reusing the room gets a lot less useful if every small edit changes something else too 😂
Meng To used AI to recreate his room in 3D for tutorial animations.
This is the kind of demo that makes me want to try a tool. Such a specific use that wouldn't even make it onto a benchmark.
@thesimaximalist I'm building a language app, so my mind went straight to lessons around objects in the room. Same setting, different conversations each time. What kind of tutorial would you use it for?
Permission prompts convert when Allow already feels useful.
Notifications after the first saved item. Location after they type a place by hand.
I'm cataloguing why successful apps order onboarding that way.
When did an app last nail the timing of that ask?