@leastfixedpoint I think this is very often true but not universal. I saw through collaboratively writing a book with AI that the surface tells can persist independently of the depth and density of the content.
@beh_zod@joshpuckett Well said. Its unfortunate the ubiquitous default is Aai to shortcut when it can be so useful on the journey. I write a lot with AI but it never feels like a shortcut but rather a new medium to explore and express my ideas. It rarely saves much time.
Wondering what to do with Fable during the extended access window? You could govern Carthage.
Petition to Carthage is a turn-based game run entirely by the model — inspired by NationStates, set in the alternate history of Mare Non Nostrum.
2/2 again, this time identifying thin prompted stories of all having very clean stories and one distinctively having unique kind of structure and morally ambiguous plot elements.
4. 3 but with sub agents reading each story and prohibition on returning lists of plot elements (style and structure report only) to main agent to prevent ancestry shortcut:...
@j_becke@lulumeservey@mignano Exactly, and "good" is not clearly defined, especially at the level of structure and deeper message, which is why we see prose which looks good at a surface level but has no depth.
I think there’s a relevant similarity between AI writing coding and AI writing
A good coder will get a much better result from AI coding
Similarly a good writer will get a much better result from AI writing, because they’ll know how to curate and edit, and they’ll know what good looks like