Lia

stan talent everyone

[Lia @aiL0210f]

Hybe asslickers can gtfo

[1tokki @juantokki]

ADOR vs Danielle Hearing
2025가합15907 (Seoul Central District Court)

Court: Seoul Central District 
Court Division: Civil Agreement Division
Hearing number: 4th hearing
Date: July 2, 2026
Presiding judge: Judge Nam In-soo
Type of case: Civil damages lawsuit

(English Transcript)
https://t.co/nniMbPX1xF

(Korean Transcript by Team Bunnies)
https://t.co/DlWuv7PYfl

[Lia @aiL0210f]

queen

[MHDHHmoment @newjeansmoment]

Minji #1 on Star Ranking for 7th Consecutive Week

https://t.co/to92yfVqto

[Lia @aiL0210f]

@worldsokuho ?

[Lia @aiL0210f]

@paldogansans

bts paved the way

[Lia @aiL0210f]

@kkurrakkurra39

[Lia @aiL0210f]

@THEOGBLACKMAMBA Did they audition this for the fifa opening?

[PoppyKPoppie @PoppyKPoppie]

❗️we reached out to both hwawoo and sejong. ❗️

they said that the alleged double contract, leaking of industry information, and all the other supposed contract violations currently circulating in online communities are fabricated rumors created by taking things out of context from beginning to end.

doesn't this side have a history of doing exactly that?

writing fictional stories by piecing together unrelated bits.

they said the claims are completely absurd. 😉
no worries, no stress.
it's also pretty telling that they're only spreading these claims through online communities. if they were true, they'd probably turn them into news articles but since they're false, that could create legal problems for whoever publishes them.

[1tokki @juantokki]

Soseolhee:

We should argue based on what the article actually says:

1. The “double contract” (dual contract) narrative that they’ve been pushing, and making the main focus of their attack, is about the ComplexCon matter.

2. Their media play is claiming that after the first-instance ruling, when Danielle and her family decided to return, they “tried to deny the existence of a double contract.”

3. When they first terminated the contract and filed the lawsuit, their stated reason was that Danielle had “caused the exclusive contract dispute and bore significant responsibility for the members’ departure and the delay in their return.”

But the exclusive contract was signed collectively, and the representative of the group was Minji. That means the narrative they’re pushing now doesn’t even fit the original grounds they gave for terminating the contract.

So it seems they’ve changed their argument to: “She was the only member who engaged in independent activities, and she also showed no willingness to correct her contractual violations.”

4. The claim that “she showed no willingness to correct her contractual violations” can be easily rebutted. When Danielle’s side asked ADOR what exactly she was supposed to do to remedy the alleged breach, ADOR essentially told her to figure it out herself.

As for the one-sided claim that her attitude during questioning was inappropriate, now that she has abandoned her appeal in the exclusive contract validity case and declared that she would rejoin ADOR, it would be impossible for that to serve as legal grounds for a court to find that the relationship of trust had irreparably broken down.

5. As for the allegation that she engaged in independent commercial activities:

- ADOR accompanied her during the activity.
- There is no resulting work product (meaning no commercial activity was actually carried out). Even according to ㅇㄹㅈ own statements, there is no evidence that any collaboration actually took place.

So there’s virtually no chance the court would accept this as anything more than a one-sided allegation.

6. As for ㅇㄹㅈ, they’re claiming that the production expenses invested at ㅇㅁㅅㄴㅇㄹㅈ during that period were actually for Danielle’s project. But they have no evidence. On top of that, it’s already publicly known that those production funds were used to make music for ㅇㄹㅂㅇ (an older female singer), so the claim is honestly ridiculous.

7. Even so, they’re now arguing that Danielle might have had a private karaoke session with the ㅇㄹㅈ members, and that this constitutes a breach of contract. Yet they can’t prove that any work was ever publicly performed or commercially exploited, nor can they prove that any money changed hands. They’re basically insisting that their instruments might have been played somewhere, without any evidence. Do they seriously think a court is going to accept an argument like that?

8. In short, ADOR can’t win this case on its merits, so they’re throwing everything at the wall… trying one allegation after another in the hope that something will stick.

[Lia @aiL0210f]

@THEOGBLACKMAMBA The loud NOO😂😂😂

[Keyveatz @Keyveatz]

Turn the #OXY up with #LNGSHOT #RYUL #WOOJIN
@LNGSHOT4sho

🔗 https://t.co/pxVULpWFPr
🔗 https://t.co/gmEtCtBYyW
🔗 https://t.co/jdpPNKqQ1T

#Keyveatz #OXY_GEN
#AOMG

[토끼리 @leeetokki]

기자들은 재판 보고 기사 쓴거라는 생각조차 안드네요 난생 처음 보는 주장들만 가득 ㅎㅎ
어처구니가 없을 지경입니다
저한테 팩트체크 차원에서 오는 질문들 다 저는 처음 듣구요 재판에 안나왔습니다
보도자료^^ 받으셨나봐요

[Lia @aiL0210f]

@rattaholic i miss when they wore their pants properly🥀🥀

[jurídico hanni pham @lontrapham]

É impressionante como a mídia está reproduzindo quase que exclusivamente a versão da ADOR sobre a audiência de hoje. A maioria das matérias está repetindo que “Danielle violou o contrato com atividades independentes e a criação da NJZ”, como se isso já estivesse comprovado. Porém, o que realmente aconteceu no tribunal foi A ADOR só citou trechos de mensagens do Telegram.
Não apresentou nenhum contrato assinado como prova.
O juiz limitou a exibição das conversas e cobrou mais objetividade da ADOR. Mesmo assim, boa parte da cobertura está ignorando esses detalhes importantes e ajudando a construir uma narrativa de que a ADOR tem um caso forte, quando na realidade eles estão tendo dificuldade de apresentar provas concretas.Isso não é jornalismo. É repetição de versão unilateral.

[562prettysister @GemmyWhi]

@nyulonly A coer started it with good intentions, another coer twist it to their own narratives, and more ignorant coer spread it around without investigating the claim...

Lasstly, us shotties gets the blame, bffr😑

[Lia @aiL0210f]

@njzfrshot @LNGSHOT4sho @LngshotUnion_ ah here comes our favourite complainer. Gotta be first to complain, amirite?

[Pop Base @PopBase]

Palestinian goalkeeper Salim Al-Ashqar has been killed by Israeli forces in Gaza.

He leaves behind his wife of 5 months who is expecting their first child.

[LNGSHOT @LNGSHOT4sho]

[4SHOCOVER] RYUL of LNGSHOT - ‘To Life’ (원곡: 박재범)

https://t.co/Fv1zqDveO8

#LNGSHOT #RYUL #4SHOCOVER

[MHDHHmoment @newjeansmoment]

New hearing schedule