Ok, giveaway time! Retweet…err, repost…and make sure you’re following for a chance to win one of these buttons and a sticker. US residents only. Winners will be randomly chosen and notified by DM. Cheers!
@scrlmer@NecroKuma3@EuanMilne7@StephenMarche For one, some are. For another, artists whose work is used by other artists as inspiration aren’t compensated. People take inspiration and learn from others’ work all the time and no one calls foul. Meanwhile, if a computer does it they act like it’s entirely different. It’s not.
It will be interesting when someone creates a database using only public domain works and those where the artist is ok with people building off them for commercial purposes. Seems inevitable and will be a game changer in the AI art discourse.
@WhiteholeEmiss@HODLFrance This, though often overstated I think, is the most accurate and honest critique of AI art, or AI anything, really. And it’s coming for every industry. We can work with it or be consumed by it but it’s inevitable.
you're not allowed to take screenshots of online district court proceedings in california, so i used stable diffusion to give you a sense of what elizabeth holmes looked like during today's brief zoom hearing.
@dkalland03 @Cielldaily@DrSeaMonster@StephenMarche By the way, did you look at that profile? He’s clearly trolling. This is the most dishonest response imaginable and proves you’re not arguing in good faith.
@dkalland03 @Cielldaily@DrSeaMonster@StephenMarche We can all point to the worst examples of anything to smear something as a whole. I could respond to this by posting a picture of someone ripping off an artist the old fashioned way. It wouldn’t be an honest reaction but would certainly meet you where you’re at.