internet dogboyโญ ๐ต๐ธ he/him FAG eng/esp ENFP || 20 || ๐๐๐๐ฒ I took the clouds for granted, that they'd always be above || I yap || Possible slight freak
Hii!!!!1!!1!1!!!! ๐๐ I'm Aim and my sona is (loosely) an Australian Shepherd. ๐ I'm a computer science student, I like indie rock music, night walks in nature and philosophy........ If you want to know more you can DM me ๐ฑ๐ฑ
Online TradCath authoritarians: "Ermm actually Truman was a Freemason who nuked Nagasaki to kill all Japanese Catholics"
Actual TradCath authoritarians:
@Pheroysa Spain has not been arming Israel since it's very existence. Spain did not maintain formal relationships with Israel well until past the end of the Francoist dictatorship and the transition to democracy. I really just can not take you seriously if every single thing you say is
@Pheroysa What i specifically wanted to criticize Morocco for though, was the western Sahara. There just wouldn't be many countries left if everyone who collaborated with Israel was excluded. But I'll keep criticizing Morocco for their significant role in the Palestinian genocide
@Pheroysa It's reasonable that two countries who have recently picked up relations wouldn't yet have full fledged embassies in each other. Neither Spain nor Israel have ambassadors in each other, by the way. Morocco directly funds Israel's war machine and weapon industries
@Pheroysa Besides the concept of not being able to criticize things happening in the present because of a contradiction in the past being ridiculous, what you're trying to do is called tu quoque
https://t.co/6072XtuSfV
@Pheroysa Spain does not provide weapons to Israel, purchase weapons from Israel, nor allow the transit of weapons originating from or destined to Israel. I informed you in my first reply
@Pheroysa I do believe that past tense "was" does give a considerably better position against the present tense "is". Irrelevant anyway, I can criticize whoever I want I'm not the Spanish state
@Pheroysa You were going to criticize Spain for weapons trading with Israel, that failed and now you know it doesn't and Morocco does so you've had to move goalposts. That's about it
@Pheroysa I'd say there's not much difference between supplying weapons and directly financing the domestic weapons industry of a militarized country with a large armament industry. Really don't see what you're trying to make look good for Morocco here though
@Pheroysa Explaining it like you're 5, consider Israel a scale. Morocco is way higher than average considering its relationships with the Israeli state and US imperialism and their enactment of similar policies in the Western Sahara ๐ซถ
@YKW__Master Independientemente de que te refieras a que no sea posible transicionar mediante reformas sin revoluciรณn, o a que se les tenga que entender como estados completamente distintos, no quita que puedas, en cualquier estado, implementar polรญticas y medidas que favorezcan al socialismo
@YKW__Master En la dictadura del proletariado el estado es la herramienta para expropiar a la burguesรญa y el estado son los obreros. No veo el propรณsito de distinguirlos. Es el estado y los obreros quienes toman los medios de producciรณn porque son lo mismo
@YKW__Master superestructura capitalista que continรบan influyendo en las relaciones de trabajo en el estado socialista. El objetivo de la dictadura del proletariado, si es que es transitiva, es destruirlos.
@YKW__Master Es en la dictadura del proletariado donde se elimina la propiedad privada y donde se comienza a desmantelar su forma de producciรณn. No es que en ella la burguesรญa mantenga un control directo y literal del capital y la producciรณn, mรกs bien que siguen existiendo residuos de la
@YKW__Master Aparte de que es muy discutible que sea "la posiciรณn de Marx y Lenin" (especialmente teniendo en cuenta que Marx nunca llegรณ a definir "socialismo"), es irrelevante que lo sea o no.