@TyRobben@peter_brecht too much over-authority layers of approval? underwriting models too slow and clunky? UW review meetings with appropriate personnel too hard to schedule quickly? WFH? "no one wants to work anymore?" something else? all of the above?
@TheFrugalBanker@TheStalwart correct; tho i suppose it doesn't meet the definition from the original post of an "appreciating asset" as these tax credits are essentially capped or locked in, downside risk exists if property owners fall out of compliance (meeting the skin in the game req)
@TyRobben@TheStalwart right, something like this
personally, as a 'leftist' and atheist, my beliefs not ostracize those who believe in souls per se, so i don't see this as a pivot at all
but can see why others might, generally
@TheStalwart ok i see... but i still don't like the premise "more fond of people who believe in souls" as if liberals categorically do not
do you see any new, or lasting, coalitions being formed here?
@TheStalwart 1) the papal response was initiated by way more than 'tech bro llm' discourse
2) your B) seems to claim liberals a) don't believe in existence of souls and/or b) aren't (or aren't very?) fond of people who believe in souls?
odd position is suppose, but perhaps i misunderstand