I am responding to all those who continue to attack the EFF.
1. Operation Dudula, Nhlanhla Lux, Fiyela and now Jacende have never marched to the Department of Home Affairs to demand that the DA Minister account for the crisis of undocumented foreigners and why borders are porous. Never because they are bought to destroy EFF. They have ziltch patriotism!
2. Those who left the EFF lacked political education and suffered from political individualism. They mistakenly believed the struggle was about them personally. They constantly boast about buying T-shirts, putting up posters and purchasing gazebos, repeatedly declaring, “It was me!” They suffer from a pronounced “me-first” syndrome.
3. Many of those who departed were already voting for other organisations; their exit was inevitable. They had stopped contributing to the EFF three years ago, routinely skipped critical branch meetings and ultimately abandoned the EFF.
4. We are prepared to meet our critics in the trenches if necessary, but we will leave them defeated in the mud. Let the critics lament — our people will not be moved.
5. We will meet on the ground.
6. No one has a monopoly on the ground.
Victory or death — we choose victory. Asambe!
EFF might make mistakes , might be making mistakes, but you can't take away the work fighters do , comparing EFF with any political party is just trying to dim our light, knowing very well that EFF is the best there is .
Im yet to see ex EFF members who are not bleeding. For some reasons nkare they left their thinking and reasoning capabilities behind when they left. Yall are not okay torh
The incapacity of the ANC to observe that Thabo Mbeki and the rest of an elite ilk, are trying to run South African society under the guise of civil society and Foundations is unfortunate.
The repetitive presentation of South Africans being spoken on behalf of by vanity projects such as Foundations of Former Presidents and people who are deceased, ought to be characterised as a neo-liberal manifestation of anarchy.
The failure to defend democratic institutions born of electoral and people’s will against personal projects like this will come back to haunt us all.
This is annoying and disingenuous. All you needed to do was listen to what Mkhwanazi said in the Portfolio committee in March. The main thing he briefed that committee about was the fact that a person close to the Minister of police informed him that someone wanted to pin him with charges of obstruction to justice(along those line). He was further accounting for the Media briefing he had had in January and the things he said there.
He further touched on the fact that they are assisting in Gauteng with political killings & that some of their challenges was that some of these criminals have ties with politicians. In this portfolio committee Mkhwanazi was basically giving an update on his work and things they were busy with as the political killings task team. Of main concern to him was the allegation that someone was out to get him.
He made none of the allegations that he made to the media in July. He made no allegations about minister Mchunu or all the other people that he mentioned in the press briefing. What he said in the media was entirely new to everyone including the portfolio committee members that sat in March. Where do you get this notion that he briefed the portfolio committee about these allegations? This is a complete lie.
When you say it’s grandiosity you’re surely saying Julius Malema is grandstanding because no other person has protested the availability of Mkhwanazi at the committee but him. So here are questions for you:
1. Was Julius part of that portfolio committee in March?
2. If the answer is no then what did you expect him to do? Draft a report on their behalf?
3. If the answer to the above is also no then what do you mean that him speaking & demanding accountability at the ad-hoc committee which he is A PART OF is grandstanding?
4. Why do you want to silence Julius Malema in the ad-hoc committee on the basis of a portfolio committee he didn’t even sit in?
5. Please point us to the minutes in the recorded portfolio meeting in March where Mkhwanazi raised the allegations that he raised at that media briefing & we’ll wait Dr Ndlozi.
These coded attacks on Julius Malema for absolutely no reason (CLEARLY) are not only spineless but also reflect on how much many of you don’t have the balls to confront this govt & how gullible all of you actually are. A truly robust & confrontational leader scares you because the media portrays them as dangerous.
Julius Malema is a voice for his constituency & we are glad that he is confrontational & not cowering to arrangements that had nothing to do with him. Don’t you dare call our voices grandiosity. That’s propaganda speaking & it’s quite disappointing coming from a learned person who could have gone back, listened to Mkhwanazi’s address &
be reminded that what he said then was different to what he said in July.
Do better, this was very low of you.