So free speech Absolutism is not 'How much one can furnish an answer' But its all bout 'why shouldn't one be able to take any questions'..
.. Can we say...Restriction to freedom of Speech & Expression in India is Contextual to social reality and nothing to do with the principles.
I keep hearing that a nationwide SIR has been put in place to remove illegal Bangladeshis from the electoral rolls. OK! Now can @ECISVEEP please tell us how many illegal Bangladeshis have been found across India in SIR exercise? No answer. How many deported under Foreigners Act. No answer! Still waiting. (net net: please clean up rolls but do it with transparency and not at the cost of eligible citizens)🙏
@nkowonnem@Wangchuk66 What happened in Tibet is absolutely wrong!
Brother I think U are not a political science student. Usually when congress say Modi became Kim Jong does mean Modi is like Kim or we are insulting Koreans it’s just and internal political rhetoric to overcome Govts attitude!
@nkowonnem@Wangchuk66 I’ll include Pakistan and USA also, if necessary I’ll compare killing of my fellow citizens by police forces like Jallianwala Massacre & Mizoram Bombardment by Indian Air Force! u want me to speak what u like.! What’s the point of debate then! Oh wait sorry India is so perfect🤩
Justice Sharma’s son is standing counsel for @ECISVEEP & he decided both Gyanesh Chor & his daughter’s matter ( out of turn too).Requesting Hon’ble CJI to take immediate remedial action. After GodiMedia India does not deserve Godi Judiciary!
Propriety Questions Emerge As Son Of Justice SC Sharma, Who Heard ECI & Medha Ropam Cases, Is Election Commiss... https://t.co/csvKqB8QTg
Why don't Indian judges feel bound by recusal standards? Justice Sharma's son as Election Commission lawyer was reason enough for recusal. Not his first time though. Justice Sharma decided high stake (1 lakh crore) tax issue in favor of Revenue despite son on income tax panel
ECI is not the villain for me. It is the SC bench which decided the fate of millions with the words “let them
Vote next time”.
They are the main culprit in killing the democracy.
One more publication.
In this Article, we've criticised the Section 105 of BNSS, 2023 which provides for mandatory videography, for statutorily giving sanctity to mobile phone recording in investigation, 2- there virtually being no consequence of not following this provision.
Hon’ble Chief Justice of India - Siddharth Sharma, son of Justice Sharma practices in Jabalpur, is empanelled by @ECISVEEP, has appeared for them. How can his father hear Gyanesh Kumar CEC’s case? How can he be put out of turn to give relief to CEC daughter?
Lawyers Association For Constitution writes to Chief Justice of India Surya Kant raising concerns over the manner in which Noida DM Medha Roopam's petition was listed.
The Association alleges that her petition was "specially assigned to a particular bench" despite the prevailing roster.
Highlighting that Medha Roopam is the daughter of the Chief Election Commissioner, the Association says preferential treatment to a matter sets a wrong precedent.
"The special listing before a particular bench has not enhanced confidence in the judicial process," the letter says.
The Association also flags the muting of the live procedings.
The issue is regarding the petition filed by Medha Roopam challenging the Allahabad High Court's order criticising her for ordering the detention of a student under the National Security Act in connection with the Noida workers' protest, and asking her to pay Rs 5 lakh compensation.
Lawyers Association For Constitution writes to Chief Justice of India Surya Kant raising concerns over the manner in which Noida DM Medha Roopam's petition was listed.
The Association alleges that her petition was "specially assigned to a particular bench" despite the prevailing roster.
Highlighting that Medha Roopam is the daughter of the Chief Election Commissioner, the Association says preferential treatment to a matter sets a wrong precedent.
"The special listing before a particular bench has not enhanced confidence in the judicial process," the letter says.
The Association also flags the muting of the live procedings.
The issue is regarding the petition filed by Medha Roopam challenging the Allahabad High Court's order criticising her for ordering the detention of a student under the National Security Act in connection with the Noida workers' protest, and asking her to pay Rs 5 lakh compensation.
A judge soon to retire has been telling people around him that he was going to head a prestigious tribunal. Now he is faced with a scandal. What is to be watched is whether the govt will risk more egg on its face by actually going through with the appointment!
@tongamrina Mam I think People at Dharmsala should hardly be bothered by Our internal politics. Wangchuk’s extreme view was purely a political rhetoric to vent Internal grief and frustration over loss of Ladakhis lives & Current regime’s attitude.
@Wangchuk66 People at dharmsala should stop interfering in India’s internal political affairs! Whatever statement Wangchuk gave is a political rehtoric to vent anger against his own government & not that of any 3rd party agencies ! If I have a complaint against my govt. I’ll vent it! Period