ajpj

[Ryou Sakai 🐺 @Ryou_Sakai]

Hey, @TeamYouTube

Thanks. You’ve just wiped over ten years of work and artistic evolution out of existence.
And just like that, my motivation to create content has gone straight down the toilet.

No decent explanation, no details, nothing that makes any sense.

I’m not even the type of content creator who likes to push the boundaries of these platforms. If there were something on my channel where YouTube said, "We’ve decided we don’t like this anymore," I’d just delete it and be done with it. But they don’t even have the decency to communicate like that.

It even feels like gaslighting. Sure, it must be me, it’s my fault. The platform cannot make a mistake, right?
There must be absolutely no one else on this planet going through the same thing as me, right?

[ajpj @ajpj40]

@ZwordsmanZ @GodofAmiibo

[ajpj @ajpj40]

@niimurin That's my goat

[ajpj @ajpj40]

@JohnCenaEpic Those are not fans. They are terrible people who don't actually care about what you make. Only destroying the community and bullying people for no reason

[ajpj @ajpj40]

@EmmArrSus

[Kamikazius the Wizard @MadKamikazius]

The perfect example for why consolebrained retards invading the PC gaming space is bad. They bring their frivolous "exclusives" and "devices" mindset along with them.
90% of PC gamers don't even care about Steam deck, the primary platform is a desktop computer.

[ajpj @ajpj40]

@jules_aint_shit

[Kirby0Louise @Kirby0Louise]

Nice damage control. “Let’s us mess with your BIOS or you’re a dirty cheater”

[AyakaMods @AyakaMods]

Japan's censorship laws have changed.

Forcing artists to slap ugly black bars all over their own work, like the image on the right, is ridiculous. It completely ruins the art make worse.

This is adult content made for adults only. There is zero reason for this level of destruction in 2026.

Artists shall never have to live in fear that their drawings will be censored into oblivion by outdated rules.

Support the creators pushing back against this. So censorship needs to stop!

[ajpj @ajpj40]

@DiddlyDooter Children's opinions on the Internet

[Truthful🛰️ @Truthful_ast]

This is why all the big entities want to control Steam

[Kaito @iKaito_1]

A Chinese player refunded a full year’s worth of payments — approximately $9,000!

> He spent 830k Primogems over the course of a year in Genshin Impact.

> After requesting the refund, his balance became -831,440.

> He said he’s retiring, so he doesn’t care if he gets banned.

Thoughts ??

#Genshinimpact #Gacha

[ajpj @ajpj40]

@Timur24k I want milk

[DatNoFact ↗ (@datnofact.bsky.social) @datnofact]

Google should never be allowed to dictate which user hardware is able to visit public websites. I wish websites would ditch reCAPTCHA for open source alternatives instead of using this god awful shit.

[ajpj @ajpj40]

@Sarapsycho666 @MoeMoeManiac Sick Dhreader

[GrapheneOS @GrapheneOS]

Apple and Google are gradually expanding their use of hardware-based attestation. They're convincing a growing number of services to adopt it. Google's Play Integrity API and Apple's App Attest API are very similar. Apple brought it to the web via Privacy Pass, which Google intends on doing too.

Google's Play Integrity API requires hardware attestation for the strong integrity level and is gradually phasing in requiring it for the more commonly used device integrity level. Apple already has it as a requirement. Over the long term, this will increasingly lock out hardware and OS competition.

The purpose of these systems is disallowing people from using hardware and software not approved by Apple or Google. This is wrongly presented as being a security feature. Banks and government services are the main ones adopting it but Apple and Google are encouraging every service to use it.

Apple's Privacy Pass brought hardware attestation to the web to help with passing captchas on their own hardware. Many people saw that as harmless since few sites would be willing to lock out non-Apple-hardware users. Apple and Google are both likely to bring broader hardware attestation to the web.

Google's reCAPTCHA is planning an approach where they use Privacy Pass on Apple hardware, their own approach on Google Mobile Services Android devices and a QR code scanning system to require an iOS or Google certified Android device for Windows and other systems:

https://t.co/7rQnioRa8A

Banking and government services increasingly require using a mobile app where they can use attestation to force using an Apple or Google approved device and OS. Apple's privacy pass, Google's 'cancelled' Web Environment Integrity and now reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification are bringing this to the web.

Current media coverage for reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification misunderstands it and the impact of it. They're bringing a hardware attestation requirement to Windows, desktop Linux, OpenBSD, etc. by requiring a QR scan from a certified smartphone to pass reCAPTCHA in some cases. They could expand it more.

Control over reCAPTCHA puts Google in a position where they can require having either iOS or a certified Android device to use an enormous amount of the web. Google defines certification requirements for Android which includes forcing bundling Google Chrome, etc. It's enormously anti-competitive.

Google's Play Integrity API bans using GrapheneOS despite it being far more secure than anything they permit. It also bans using any other alternative. This isn't somehow specific to an AOSP-based OS. You can't avoid this by using a mobile OS based on FreeBSD instead. You'll just be more locked out.

Google's Play Integrity API permits devices with no security patches for 10 years. The device integrity level can be bypassed via spoofing but they can detect it quite well and block it once it starts being done at scale. The strong integrity level requires leaked keys from TEEs/SEs to bypass it.

It doesn't provide a useful security feature, but it does lock out competition very well. Services requiring Apple App Attest or Google Play Integrity are primarily helping to lock in Apple and Google having a duopoly for mobile devices. Play Integrity is more relevant due to AOSP being open source.

Governments are increasingly mandating using Apple's App Attest and Google's Play Integrity for not only their own services but also commercial services. The EU is leading the charge of making these requirements for digital payments, ID, age verification, etc. Many EU government apps require them.

Instead of governments stopping Apple and Google from engaging in egregiously anti-competitive behavior, they're directly participating in locking out competition via their own services. Requiring people to have an Apple device or Google-certified Android device is anti-competition, not security.

reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification will currently work with sandboxed Google Play on GrapheneOS but it clearly exists to provide a way for them to start using hardware attestation on systems without it. People without an iOS or Android device will be locked out when this is required even without that.

This isn't about security or any missing functionality. GrapheneOS can be verified via hardware attestation. Google bans using GrapheneOS for Play Integrity because we don't license Google Mobile Services and conform to anti-competitive rules already found to be illegal in South Korea and elsewhere.

Services shouldn't ban people from using arbitrary hardware and operating systems in the first place. Google's security excuse is clearly bogus when they permit devices with no patches for 10 years but not a much more secure OS. It's for enforcing their monopolies via GMS licensing, that's all.

[Chibi Reviews @ChibiReviews]

Cloudflare going after drawings and bullying Gelbooru into the ground.

If these companies focused on real problems, the world would be a better place

[MEGA @MEGAprivacy]

Google's reCAPTCHA now requires a QR code scan that only works with Google Play Services or a modern iPhone, meaning anyone without a certified device can't verify.

They tried this in 2023 (Web Environment Integrity) and pulled it after public outcry, so this time they launched it as a commercial product instead of a public proposal.

The old CAPTCHA methods are still accessible as a fallback for now, but how long Google keeps that option around is anyone's guess. 🤷‍♂️

[International Cyber Digest @IntCyberDigest]

‼️🚨 ALARMING: Google now treats privacy as suspicious behavior by default. Users of GrapheneOS, CalyxOS, /e/OS, and other deGoogled Android phones are being locked out of millions of websites unless they install the exact Google Play Services software they deliberately removed.

GrapheneOS is recommended by the EFF and used by journalists, lawyers, and activists in high-risk environments. The audience most likely to read Google's data practices and refuse its terms is now flagged as fraudulent for that exact decision.

What happened?:
▪️ Google announced "Cloud Fraud Defense" at Cloud Next on April 22-23, 2026, branding it "the next evolution of reCAPTCHA." Existing reCAPTCHA customers were auto-migrated.
▪️ When the system flags traffic as suspicious, the old click-the-bus puzzle is gone. Users get a QR code instead.
▪️ Scanning the QR code requires Google Play Services running on the device. Internet Archive snapshots show this requirement has been live since at least October 2025, silently rolled out for 7 months before anyone noticed.
▪️ No Play Services = no QR scan = locked out.

The bigger picture:
▪️ Google already tried this in 2023. It was called Web Environment Integrity (WEI), and it would have let Google decide which devices were "real enough" to access the web. Standards bodies and the public pushed back hard, and Google killed it. Three years later, the same idea is back, just hidden behind a QR code instead of a browser feature.
▪️ reCAPTCHA runs on millions of websites. Every developer who keeps using it is now, by default, telling deGoogled Android users they're not welcome...