🇨🇳 PHẢN ỨNG CỦA CỘNG ĐỒNG PUBG PC TRUNG QUỐC SAU ÁN PHẠT GLOBAL BAN VĨNH VIỄN CỦA HIMASS VÀ TANVUU
1. "Mấy vụ gian lận ở giải đấu chính thức thì *éo thấy xử lý, còn giải giao hữu giải trí mà tuyển thủ chuyên nghiệp đi snipe lại ăn phạt nặng đến thế à? Đề nghị ban tổ chức PCL học tập theo liền đi chứ!"
2. "Trước khi bấm vào xem tui cứ nghĩ chỉ là cấm tham gia một giải đấu cụ thể thôi, vì cấm toàn diện mọi giải đấu nghe nó hư cấu vãi ra. Ấy thế mà... thật không ngờ luôn đó! Ngoài ra nhớ đợt PGS hồi tháng 4, bên TE vì có phát ngôn mang tính phân biệt chủng tộc với tuyển thủ nào đó bên DNS nên bị trừ điểm ở vòng Breakout đúng không? Hai bên này mối thù sâu nặng đến thế cơ à? (Kiểu khán giả ở khu vực nào chửi đổng trên mạng thì không chấp, nhưng đằng này toàn là do tuyển thủ tự tay 'phát lực' drama hết lần này đến lần khác...)"
3. "Hình như nghe nói Himass kỹ năng cá nhân thuộc dạng siêu quái vật đúng không? Ít theo dõi nên không rõ lắm, không biết bị cấm thế này có tác động gì lớn không. (PS: Cảm giác phạt hơi bị nặng tay, nhưng mà chọc phải đội chủ nhà thì ăn gậy cũng là bình thường thôi)"
4. "Thế còn bên nữ streamer kia đã được điều tra làm rõ chưa vậy?"
5. "Một cái giải giao hữu rác rưởi mà cấm thi đấu cả hai tuyển thủ chuyên nghiệp, bọn Hàn Quốc đúng kiểu tiêu chuẩn kép (double standards) vãi chưởng! Người nhà mình đi nhìn lén màn hình ở giải chính thức thì xin lỗi qua loa là xong chuyện, còn tuyển thủ Việt Nam dính ở giải giao hữu thì giáng khung hình phạt tối đa. Bó tay thật sự!"
6. "Đúng là phong cách 'nghiêm khắc với người khác, bao dung với chính mình' điển hình của bọn Hàn!"
7. "Hai ông cu con này nghĩ cái gì trong đầu không biết, cạn lời thật sự!"
8. "Tuyển thủ Hàn Quốc bắn giải chính thức soi màn hình thì chỉ bị phạt cho có lệ, tuyển thủ Việt Nam bắn cái giải giao hữu vui vẻ soi màn hình phát ăn ngay án cấm thi đấu. Bọn Hàn này tiêu chuẩn kép vãi. Tui còn nghe đồn cả khu vực Việt Nam chuẩn bị rút khỏi PUBG luôn rồi kìa!"
9. "Đội Hàn Quốc soi màn hình gian lận thì không làm sao, Việt Nam gian lận phát là ăn cấm vĩnh viễn luôn, đúng là quá tiêu chuẩn kép. Không phải tẩy trắng cho hai ông kia đâu nhé, làm sai ăn phạt là đúng, nhưng tui nghĩ tất cả những đội từng làm trò bẩn thỉu tương tự cũng phải bị phạt hết mới công bằng!"
#himass #tanvuu
@7a1bch@Coriandersayso Haha mấy thằng không có miền bắc chúng mày tự chơi 1 mình đi,đéo có bọn tao thì ai biết tới cái game của chúng mày mà bày đặt thượng đẳng
Cách duy nhất mà họ có thể làm để né tránh chúng tôi đó là :
'' CẤM VĨNH VIỄN NHÀ VUA '' 😂😂
Họ bảo vệ người coi thường cái giải đấu danh giá nhất của họ,tôi chả còn gì để nói 😆😆
Tóm tắt diễn biến tại đây 👉 : https://t.co/IL8oHRcqnD
#himass #tanvuu #China #thailand #pubg
@BoPhmThi6@LeninUGReal M đang bảo vệ điều gì,trong khi 2 việc là giống nhau,m có xem và đánh giá phân tích tại sao họ mở 4 tab 1 lúc không,và ngay lập tức xoá bỏ live khi bị phát hiện vấn đề này.
Bọn t đã lưu lại hết video cãi bằng trời hhh
To our international friends and the entire PUBG player community:
Recently, there has been significant controversy within the gaming community regarding the publisher's decision to permanently ban two of our players, Himass and TanVuu
In Vietnam, we always strive for fair competition and aim to deliver exciting, emotional experiences to viewers and international friends during tournaments. It is deeply frustrating that a lighthearted showmatch suddenly turned into a blatant purge orchestrated by the publisher.
The outcome they delivered has left us outraged for several reasons:
- The tournament was organized with vague and unclear rules and regulations.
- They issued permanent bans against our players based on suspicions and allegations of cheating (specifically "stream sniping"). Yet, the rules were ambiguous, and the Korean participants employed similar tactics (Image 1). Many aspects of the tournament seemed biased toward the Korean side, giving them an advantage; they knew where teams were engaging in combat and avoided those areas (Image 2), and they even knew exactly which player number they were facing during confrontations.
- They demanded that our players apologize to the very person who instigated this drama, only to use that apology as evidence to pin the blame on us and justify their own actions as correct.
- It is absurd that there was no mention of their own player's violations; instead, they publicly apologized to their player—even though she sparked the drama—while treating the Vietnamese team as the default offender (as if they were the publisher's "golden child") (Image 3).
- Their player/streamer played the victim, repeatedly posting videos criticizing our players.
- Even more ridiculous is the publisher's complete lack of impartial action; they even went so far as to completely remove our language option from the game. They issued no official statement (perhaps they wanted to use this situation as a pretext to abandon a market that was generating high engagement for us).
We in Vietnam always play fair in competitive tournaments—a fact clearly recognized by the international community.
Numerous entertainment venues are boycotting the game by uninstalling PUBG from their servers and removing it from Vietnam due to this gross injustice; this move demonstrates that we are unafraid of confrontation and are ready to go all the way to address the unfair treatment of Himass and TanVuu
Did the team's humiliating defeat drive them to resort to underhanded tactics to interfere with tournaments intended to bring glory to the nation?
Once again, we ask for your thoughts, comments, and help in sharing this story with the international community so that everyone can understand the situation and avoid any misconceptions regarding Himass and TanVuu.
Everyone is witnessing these events—after all, is the best way to win simply to eliminate the King? 😂😂
We propose removing PUBG from the EWC and ENC tournaments due to a lack of competitive fairness; specifically, players are deliberately treated unfairly while the organizers show favoritism toward players affiliated with the game's own management entity.
@EWC_EN@EWC_AR
#PUBG
#vietnam
To our international friends and the entire PUBG player community:
Recently, there has been significant controversy within the gaming community regarding the publisher's decision to permanently ban two of our players, Himass and TanVuu
In Vietnam, we always strive for fair competition and aim to deliver exciting, emotional experiences to viewers and international friends during tournaments. It is deeply frustrating that a lighthearted showmatch suddenly turned into a blatant purge orchestrated by the publisher.
The outcome they delivered has left us outraged for several reasons:
- The tournament was organized with vague and unclear rules and regulations.
- They issued permanent bans against our players based on suspicions and allegations of cheating (specifically "stream sniping"). Yet, the rules were ambiguous, and the Korean participants employed similar tactics (Image 1). Many aspects of the tournament seemed biased toward the Korean side, giving them an advantage; they knew where teams were engaging in combat and avoided those areas (Image 2), and they even knew exactly which player number they were facing during confrontations.
- They demanded that our players apologize to the very person who instigated this drama, only to use that apology as evidence to pin the blame on us and justify their own actions as correct.
- It is absurd that there was no mention of their own player's violations; instead, they publicly apologized to their player—even though she sparked the drama—while treating the Vietnamese team as the default offender (as if they were the publisher's "golden child") (Image 3).
- Their player/streamer played the victim, repeatedly posting videos criticizing our players.
- Even more ridiculous is the publisher's complete lack of impartial action; they even went so far as to completely remove our language option from the game. They issued no official statement (perhaps they wanted to use this situation as a pretext to abandon a market that was generating high engagement for us).
We in Vietnam always play fair in competitive tournaments—a fact clearly recognized by the international community.
Numerous entertainment venues are boycotting the game by uninstalling PUBG from their servers and removing it from Vietnam due to this gross injustice; this move demonstrates that we are unafraid of confrontation and are ready to go all the way to address the unfair treatment of Himass and TanVuu
Did the team's humiliating defeat drive them to resort to underhanded tactics to interfere with tournaments intended to bring glory to the nation?
Once again, we ask for your thoughts, comments, and help in sharing this story with the international community so that everyone can understand the situation and avoid any misconceptions regarding Himass and TanVuu.
Everyone is witnessing these events—after all, is the best way to win simply to eliminate the King? 😂😂
We propose removing PUBG from the EWC and ENC tournaments due to a lack of competitive fairness; specifically, players are deliberately treated unfairly while the organizers show favoritism toward players affiliated with the game's own management entity.
@EWC_EN@EWC_AR
#PUBG
#vietnam
To our international friends and the entire PUBG player community:
Recently, there has been significant controversy within the gaming community regarding the publisher's decision to permanently ban two of our players, Himass and TanVuu
In Vietnam, we always strive for fair competition and aim to deliver exciting, emotional experiences to viewers and international friends during tournaments. It is deeply frustrating that a lighthearted showmatch suddenly turned into a blatant purge orchestrated by the publisher.
The outcome they delivered has left us outraged for several reasons:
- The tournament was organized with vague and unclear rules and regulations.
- They issued permanent bans against our players based on suspicions and allegations of cheating (specifically "stream sniping"). Yet, the rules were ambiguous, and the Korean participants employed similar tactics (Image 1). Many aspects of the tournament seemed biased toward the Korean side, giving them an advantage; they knew where teams were engaging in combat and avoided those areas (Image 2), and they even knew exactly which player number they were facing during confrontations.
- They demanded that our players apologize to the very person who instigated this drama, only to use that apology as evidence to pin the blame on us and justify their own actions as correct.
- It is absurd that there was no mention of their own player's violations; instead, they publicly apologized to their player—even though she sparked the drama—while treating the Vietnamese team as the default offender (as if they were the publisher's "golden child") (Image 3).
- Their player/streamer played the victim, repeatedly posting videos criticizing our players.
- Even more ridiculous is the publisher's complete lack of impartial action; they even went so far as to completely remove our language option from the game. They issued no official statement (perhaps they wanted to use this situation as a pretext to abandon a market that was generating high engagement for us).
We in Vietnam always play fair in competitive tournaments—a fact clearly recognized by the international community.
Numerous entertainment venues are boycotting the game by uninstalling PUBG from their servers and removing it from Vietnam due to this gross injustice; this move demonstrates that we are unafraid of confrontation and are ready to go all the way to address the unfair treatment of Himass and TanVuu
Did the team's humiliating defeat drive them to resort to underhanded tactics to interfere with tournaments intended to bring glory to the nation?
Once again, we ask for your thoughts, comments, and help in sharing this story with the international community so that everyone can understand the situation and avoid any misconceptions regarding Himass and TanVuu.
Everyone is witnessing these events—after all, is the best way to win simply to eliminate the King? 😂😂
We propose removing PUBG from the EWC and ENC tournaments due to a lack of competitive fairness; specifically, players are deliberately treated unfairly while the organizers show favoritism toward players affiliated with the game's own management entity.
@EWC_EN@EWC_AR
#PUBG
#vietnam
Cách duy nhất mà họ có thể làm để né tránh chúng tôi đó là :
'' CẤM VĨNH VIỄN NHÀ VUA '' 😂😂
Họ bảo vệ người coi thường cái giải đấu danh giá nhất của họ,tôi chả còn gì để nói 😆😆
Tóm tắt diễn biến tại đây 👉 : https://t.co/bC7uXbPQJO
#himass#tanvuu
#China #thailand #pubg
To our international friends and the entire PUBG player community:
Recently, there has been significant controversy within the gaming community regarding the publisher's decision to permanently ban two of our players, Himass and TanVuu
In Vietnam, we always strive for fair competition and aim to deliver exciting, emotional experiences to viewers and international friends during tournaments. It is deeply frustrating that a lighthearted showmatch suddenly turned into a blatant purge orchestrated by the publisher.
The outcome they delivered has left us outraged for several reasons:
- The tournament was organized with vague and unclear rules and regulations.
- They issued permanent bans against our players based on suspicions and allegations of cheating (specifically "stream sniping"). Yet, the rules were ambiguous, and the Korean participants employed similar tactics (Image 1). Many aspects of the tournament seemed biased toward the Korean side, giving them an advantage; they knew where teams were engaging in combat and avoided those areas (Image 2), and they even knew exactly which player number they were facing during confrontations.
- They demanded that our players apologize to the very person who instigated this drama, only to use that apology as evidence to pin the blame on us and justify their own actions as correct.
- It is absurd that there was no mention of their own player's violations; instead, they publicly apologized to their player—even though she sparked the drama—while treating the Vietnamese team as the default offender (as if they were the publisher's "golden child") (Image 3).
- Their player/streamer played the victim, repeatedly posting videos criticizing our players.
- Even more ridiculous is the publisher's complete lack of impartial action; they even went so far as to completely remove our language option from the game. They issued no official statement (perhaps they wanted to use this situation as a pretext to abandon a market that was generating high engagement for us).
We in Vietnam always play fair in competitive tournaments—a fact clearly recognized by the international community.
Numerous entertainment venues are boycotting the game by uninstalling PUBG from their servers and removing it from Vietnam due to this gross injustice; this move demonstrates that we are unafraid of confrontation and are ready to go all the way to address the unfair treatment of Himass and TanVuu
Did the team's humiliating defeat drive them to resort to underhanded tactics to interfere with tournaments intended to bring glory to the nation?
Once again, we ask for your thoughts, comments, and help in sharing this story with the international community so that everyone can understand the situation and avoid any misconceptions regarding Himass and TanVuu.
Everyone is witnessing these events—after all, is the best way to win simply to eliminate the King? 😂😂
We propose removing PUBG from the EWC and ENC tournaments due to a lack of competitive fairness; specifically, players are deliberately treated unfairly while the organizers show favoritism toward players affiliated with the game's own management entity.
@EWC_EN@EWC_AR
To our international friends and the entire PUBG player community:
Recently, there has been significant controversy within the gaming community regarding the publisher's decision to permanently ban two of our players, Himass and TanVuu
In Vietnam, we always strive for fair competition and aim to deliver exciting, emotional experiences to viewers and international friends during tournaments. It is deeply frustrating that a lighthearted showmatch suddenly turned into a blatant purge orchestrated by the publisher.
The outcome they delivered has left us outraged for several reasons:
- The tournament was organized with vague and unclear rules and regulations.
- They issued permanent bans against our players based on suspicions and allegations of cheating (specifically "stream sniping"). Yet, the rules were ambiguous, and the Korean participants employed similar tactics (Image 1). Many aspects of the tournament seemed biased toward the Korean side, giving them an advantage; they knew where teams were engaging in combat and avoided those areas (Image 2), and they even knew exactly which player number they were facing during confrontations.
- They demanded that our players apologize to the very person who instigated this drama, only to use that apology as evidence to pin the blame on us and justify their own actions as correct.
- It is absurd that there was no mention of their own player's violations; instead, they publicly apologized to their player—even though she sparked the drama—while treating the Vietnamese team as the default offender (as if they were the publisher's "golden child") (Image 3).
- Their player/streamer played the victim, repeatedly posting videos criticizing our players.
- Even more ridiculous is the publisher's complete lack of impartial action; they even went so far as to completely remove our language option from the game. They issued no official statement (perhaps they wanted to use this situation as a pretext to abandon a market that was generating high engagement for us).
We in Vietnam always play fair in competitive tournaments—a fact clearly recognized by the international community.
Numerous entertainment venues are boycotting the game by uninstalling PUBG from their servers and removing it from Vietnam due to this gross injustice; this move demonstrates that we are unafraid of confrontation and are ready to go all the way to address the unfair treatment of Himass and TanVuu
Did the team's humiliating defeat drive them to resort to underhanded tactics to interfere with tournaments intended to bring glory to the nation?
Once again, we ask for your thoughts, comments, and help in sharing this story with the international community so that everyone can understand the situation and avoid any misconceptions regarding Himass and TanVuu.
Everyone is witnessing these events—after all, is the best way to win simply to eliminate the King? 😂😂
We propose removing PUBG from the EWC and ENC tournaments due to a lack of competitive fairness; specifically, players are deliberately treated unfairly while the organizers show favoritism toward players affiliated with the game's own management entity.
@EWC_EN@EWC_AR
#PUBG
#vietnam
To our international friends and the entire PUBG player community:
Recently, there has been significant controversy within the gaming community regarding the publisher's decision to permanently ban two of our players, Himass and TuanVu.
In Vietnam, we always strive for fair competition and aim to deliver exciting, emotional experiences to viewers and international friends during tournaments. It is deeply frustrating that a lighthearted showmatch suddenly turned into a blatant purge orchestrated by the publisher.
The outcome they delivered has left us outraged for several reasons:
- The tournament was organized with vague and unclear rules and regulations.
- They issued permanent bans against our players based on suspicions and allegations of cheating (specifically "stream sniping"). Yet, the rules were ambiguous, and the Korean participants employed similar tactics (Image 1). Many aspects of the tournament seemed biased toward the Korean side, giving them an advantage; they knew where teams were engaging in combat and avoided those areas (Image 2), and they even knew exactly which player number they were facing during confrontations.
- They demanded that our players apologize to the very person who instigated this drama, only to use that apology as evidence to pin the blame on us and justify their own actions as correct.
- It is absurd that there was no mention of their own player's violations; instead, they publicly apologized to their player—even though she sparked the drama—while treating the Vietnamese team as the default offender (as if they were the publisher's "golden child") (Image 3).
- Their player/streamer played the victim, repeatedly posting videos criticizing our players.
- Even more ridiculous is the publisher's complete lack of impartial action; they even went so far as to completely remove our language option from the game. They issued no official statement (perhaps they wanted to use this situation as a pretext to abandon a market that was generating high engagement for us).
We in Vietnam always play fair in competitive tournaments—a fact clearly recognized by the international community.
Numerous entertainment venues are boycotting the game by uninstalling PUBG from their servers and removing it from Vietnam due to this gross injustice; this move demonstrates that we are unafraid of confrontation and are ready to go all the way to address the unfair treatment of Himass and TuanVu.
Did the team's humiliating defeat drive them to resort to underhanded tactics to interfere with tournaments intended to bring glory to the nation?
Once again, we ask for your thoughts, comments, and help in sharing this story with the international community so that everyone can understand the situation and avoid any misconceptions regarding Himass and TuanVu.
Everyone is witnessing these events—after all, is the best way to win simply to eliminate the King? 😂😂
We propose removing PUBG from the EWC and ENC tournaments due to a lack of competitive fairness; specifically, players are deliberately treated unfairly while the organizers show favoritism toward players affiliated with the game's own management entity.