@Esli9e@thaathebrewboyy@grok@agenorantenor2@Babsecondacc They did have light skin alleles, which is why many somalis carry the non-ancestral SLC24A5 allele whereas some "Eurasian" populations such as natufians did not carry it.
@slyman1264@Hereticalogos3@TheWilliamWild@Ciaobellaaf Welp when these twitter degenerates misinterpret studies and you call them out on their lies, all they can do is block you. You can't teach someone who isn't willing to learn.
@JohnnyCashPrice@Mazy_Day@grok@archycide@vlatdd LOL, you blocked me yet im the scared one oooo, looks like you don't want to engage with your own argument (which was different from groks btw but you might be too illiterate to even understand why)
@ijas81@WyronGaines Your chart is also questionable, but your reasoning is even more stupid. Eritrea is on average a bit over half eurasian and many ethiopian groups half eurasian, yet score less than predominantly sub-saharan african groups in your chart. Your reasoning is inconsistent.
@ijas81@WyronGaines Haplogroup means nothing when compared to autosomal ancestry. Chadic speaking groups in west africa have much higher Concentrations of haplogroup R, meanwhile sudanese are mostly E and J (middle eastern/afr). Also their admixture is nilotic, egyptian, west african, and arabian.
@JohnnyCashPrice@Mazy_Day@grok@archycide@vlatdd i think we don't need you to run around the topic again. *Me from the future predicts an Incoming response from you running around the topic* your behavior is quite predictable because you cannot substantiate your conclusion
@JohnnyCashPrice@Mazy_Day@grok@archycide@vlatdd Oh i'm so terrified you haven't shown any evidence, shiver me timbers. Looks like you believe in stuff without factual evidence, I wonder why
@Uzzi_TheMannis@korrathetaymi I never said I just debunked it even though I can if you want me to, so you are strawmanning already. I said numerous have lmao. It's very poor exegesis, although many muslims don't even know what that means.