@DiscussingFilm@etalkCTV Look at me im Tom Holland, im married to Zendaya and I get to be Spider-Man and Anne Hathaway called me a good boy 😒 Fuck you bruh
@kaireon_YT@TheDJ_King in order for that theory to be true, essential particles have to be able to decay into uncharged, massless states where they can't interact with each other. it might be plausible, but it goes against what we currently know in physics... maybe in the future idk
@dakdanielsrso@TheDJ_King no, thats not the concept at all. my concept is more that god is all-encompassing. outside of our physical realm, god always was and always is
@Rbcpsaea@TheDJ_King yeah, evidence from experiments, that leads scientists to create theoretical laws from what they've observed. what were you trying to say here bruh
@packers_owner_j@TheDJ_King "we don't know what caused it", which is true, but we know SOMETHING caused it. some divine/cosmic force. a god. not a religious god, but simply an energy that caused our creation and set our natural/physical laws into place, instead of all-encompassing singularity
@packers_owner_j@TheDJ_King but what's undeniable, is that our universe is finite and had a beginning. the reason the big bang is widely accepted is because its the only theory that works with the evidence we have of the universe's expansion. nothing else really fits
@Rbcpsaea@TheDJ_King yeah, but even still, athiesm would be going against scientific theory and physical laws. all of science is based on theoretical laws
@kaireon_YT@TheDJ_King there isn't, and probably won't be any concrete evidence. but scientific theory makes it clear that the universe had a definitive beginning. something divine or cosmic had to set our universe in motion (causing the big bang) for it to exist to begin with.
@USMNTBob man just stfu and let people side with another team in a game outside our bracket. it doesn't matter because we all root for the USMNT when they play
@xoalajaisnzloa@Manly13plus@georgePilled@Variety this is the exact type of ignorance that breaks up any meaningful discussion. you're more concerned with confirming your own narrative than accepting that you just misread a sentence