@YurrrYurrr66926@HarshithLucky3 I have said it once and I'll say it again: Gemini models should not be used for coding work. I have been using it for 30 minutes and I feel like punching my screen. I'm getting false flagged for absolutely no reason every two prompts even when I just say "hi" to it
@desa_th@HarshithLucky3 Now I'm getting this bug whenever the agent uses a skill.md file that it created. I can still use the model in different chats, wtf.
@tonystark_mk3@AI_Screening Be honest, do you actually use Claude? If not, yes, Gemini can do the job with some wrestling it's just not pleasant to use
@tonystark_mk3@AI_Screening Cost: It's more expensive than Opus per task. Performance: Worse than Haiku in a real codebase. Speed: Much slower than Opus.
These benchmarks mean nothing when you try it in real work, not just one shotting useless 3D things
the only good thing about it is just chat and vision
@JamesDa55049936 Gemini will never be on Anthropic's level until Google replaces the entire board and runs it like a real, independent company instead of a hobby startup
@JamesDa55049936 If Gemini's top model (Carbon) is worse than Haiku at coding tasks, how is their cheaper, less intelligent model supposed to beat Sonnet?
@ultrahumanite9@imjustnewatai It's not a harness problem I used Claude in Antigravity too. Gemini just isn't trained for real coding work; it's only good for one-shots, and that's it.
@imjustnewatai Sorry for the toxicity, but whoever compares Gemini to any Claude model even Haiku in coding tasks is a retard. Like, it's not even close. Gemini is unusable in a real codebase; it's been reading files for like 10 minutes for a very small task that I even told it how to do