@fidelio327431@chaaseisst90531@ThunderPantsu@PuckSlop@mask_bastard Yes people with ovotestes who also make ova are male too? What about males that never was able to produce gametes.
You are really the one that said "first grade biology is dumb" but then uses the exact same first grade biology as your argument lmfao
@fidelio327431@chaaseisst90531@ThunderPantsu@PuckSlop@mask_bastard Transvestite is for people only changing clothes, and yes those are used in sex determination, sex is multidimensional not just 0 and 1s.
It is more bimodal than it seems binary but that is too complicated for you to understand.
@fidelio327431@chaaseisst90531@ThunderPantsu@PuckSlop@mask_bastard Oh yes females with XY chromosomes but a gene deletion (sry) who makes eggs, male chromosomes but all the rest developed female! Just because it's one thing male out of the mosaic of things they stay female, some idiots would call them males just cuz of first grade biology lol
@LifeandliesSyra@strstyler@androgenic_ Trans people exist! They actually need to be medically treated like the sex female (trans women) otherwise you can give them too high of a dosage for many drugs.
@maybe_ellen@weeklyw0rldnews@SianHerfield@Ponyhead333@lambshanksss@androgenic_ 1. You agreed it's going beyond what a woman is
2 said what was going beyond women was a man
3 agreed to some weird ass misogynistic view that men are beyond what it means to be a woman(transhumanism and transhuman)
You tried so hard to backpedal each time you agreed to something
@southernmsgurl@featherwghtwing@MuckerWes To call a multi-country, peer-reviewed genomic sequencing cohort of nearly 800 people "considerably small" is the ultimate couch-expert behavior. It's not a pharmaceutical trials, it costs so much to genetically sequence 800 people than to have pharmatrials done on 2000 people.
@southernmsgurl@featherwghtwing@MuckerWes You are literally describing standard multifactorial biology and pretending it's a flaw. Genetic predispositions interacting with developmental experiences is how almost every complex human trait works. You went from saying there were zero genetic links. Thank you for conceding!
@maybe_ellen@weeklyw0rldnews@SianHerfield@Ponyhead333@lambshanksss@androgenic_ A transwoman isn't a man it's supposed to be something going beyond what a woman is literally transcending it, like transhumans transcend what a human is.
But now you're saying men are transcending women.
Kinda wild.... I shall rest my case, you've ridiculed yourself enoughπ
@maybe_ellen@weeklyw0rldnews@SianHerfield@Ponyhead333@lambshanksss@androgenic_ By beyond woman it means transcending woman like in transhuman, that's not man.
You keep changing your definition while agreeing to that.
Not only that they're both a transwoman and a man? Aren't you being misogynistic saying men are beyond and transcending what a woman is?
@maybe_ellen@weeklyw0rldnews@SianHerfield@Ponyhead333@lambshanksss@androgenic_ No that would be transman.
Damn so you agree on the ideology of transhumanism and transwomanism?
That technology and medical advancement could create beings beyond woman and transcend, holy moly.
Trans women are actually beings beyond what women are?!
@maybe_ellen@weeklyw0rldnews@SianHerfield@Ponyhead333@lambshanksss@androgenic_ That's not how prefix works, you aren't using the prefix attached to gender which makes it the adjective "transgender"
You're using the prefix directly on woman. For a human (transhuman) it means going beyond human, for woman, transwoman would mean going beyond woman.
@maybe_ellen@weeklyw0rldnews@SianHerfield@Ponyhead333@lambshanksss@androgenic_ I will ask you a question because you don't understand grammar.
What does transwoman mean.
Because a transhuman is a being that resembles a human in most respects but who has powers and abilities beyond those of standard humans.
Transwomen go beyond women?
Are you retarded?
@southernmsgurl@featherwghtwing@MuckerWes Yes genes can do a lot of things. Most research looked at 30 trans people only, this one was both USA and Australia together searching for people to sequence. The findings are much more clear than from previous research done on it. It's not the first one.
You said there was none
@southernmsgurl@featherwghtwing@MuckerWes All papers have a limitation section.
It is called "small sample size" (actually massive in genomic research, 800 people getting genetic sequencing) it means it's actual peer-reviewed science. It doesn't make it "not real" they still got significant massive findings from it!