@elonmusk Sovereignty is the first duty of parents.
Self‑sovereignty is the first right of the child.
Non‑extraction is the first obligation of all sovereign beings.
Monitoring and control of sovereignty do not occur at the same layer as accounting.
And that is exactly why many bankers do not use algorithmic governance tests —
because those tests would expose extractive practices inside a sovereign system.
@campbellclaret That is a peculiar lol
For the peculiar times we have been forced to experience since the US unilateral end of the cold war for extraction because stewardship did not work for their libertarian capitalists and their Zionist banker friends.
@SuellaBraverman Extracting political power by abandoning integrity in a previous party — and then staying silent or complicit through votes — isn’t “strategy”. It’s a political game that should never exist as a path to opposition growth. Healthy politics doesn’t reward that behaviour.
@elonmusk Presumably the police force can trace this, as they shoukd if she now poses as minister of sovreign strwardship, and decide which crimes she may be commiting if there is no evidence for the words used to influence policies against the [non]/sovreign humans that she bags together.
@Nigel_Farage A party cannot be meritocratic if its power structure is vertically controlled by donors, media patrons, and ideological gatekeepers. Meritocracy requires open competition; extraction requires controlled access.
@Nigel_Farage@SuellaBraverman This says more about performative than the fact that half the kids are not able to get a better state of outcomes through Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.
@SuellaBraverman We have seen enough reform that merely transforms plutocrats into newly organized forms of the demos — structures that erode rather than restore sovereignty to the sovereign. It is time to replace plutocracy with sovereign stewardship."
Linking the loss of sovereignty of one country’s soldiers to the sovereignty of another country’s patients creates a relationship that should never exist between two human groups. It can never pay its own moral or economic cost, and it will never satisfy avarice.
@ArthurMacwaters@mattvanswol Sovereign citizens contribute their full one‑third share.
Corporate personhoods contribute only half of their two‑thirds obligation.
The unpaid half becomes a hidden levy on the public, who end up funding the infrastructure that corporate assets depend on.
@mattvanswol@ArthurMacwaters Not sure what bottom yiu are talking about but if you mean by contribution to extractive corporate personhoods you are talking about the most vulnerable to abuse by avarice worshipers in the world !
@elonmusk One, or many, cannot deliver sovereignty by carrying false fortunes and leaving misfortune behind.
Avarice multiplies appetite, not sovereignty.
Stewardship lifts the world — extraction only lifts itself.
@0ivankaTrump1 No, not outside Scotland. It would dilute the sovereignty of a handshake with a true scotsman that loves their land more than money. I would do Namaste, or bow, because the greeting travels with its own sovereignty.