@EricLDaugh Greenland isn't a strategic asset to be "acquired." Under the 2009 Self-Government Act, they have the explicit legal right to independence. Any talk of a "deal" is an imperialist fantasy that disregards the democratic will of the Greenlandic people. 3/
@EricLDaugh While the U.S. is still uncovering the legacy of 400+ boarding schools and 1,000 deaths, or the systemic sterilization of Native women into the 70s, Greenland has achieved a level of political autonomy U.S. Indigenous groups are still fighting for. 2/3
@JDVance Stopping the killing now means locking in Russian land grabs and stripping Ukraine of NATO protection.
This guarantees the next war – Russia re-arms, Ukraine is weakened, foreign troops banned. It’s not peace—it’s a setup for invasion 2.0.
@RasmusJarlov Mange herhjemme taler om at amerikanerne de-eskalerer konflikten, også Løkke. Det er nok lige indtil fredag hvor JD Vance holder endnu en vanvittig og chokerende tale. Tror der bliver nok at følge med i i weekenden🤯
@UshaVanceNews 1. Greenland is NOT for sale!
2. 85% of Greenlanders dont want to be part of USA
3. They want long term independence but for the time being prefer to stay in the current setup with DK
4. Stop acting like Russia did on Crimea before they invaded it and stole it from Ukraine!
@RasmusJarlov What do you think about confiscating part of or all of the frozen Russian EUR assets worth approx 190-207 bEUR? That could fund the war and hopefully benefit building up Ukraine (is not taken over fully by the aggressor Russia).
@JimFergusonUK This is not NOT true. Absolutely false.
Greenlanders will not join the US. Look at the real polls!
So you wanna force a population to be occupied by the US?
While a large proportion of Americans thinks its a bad idea.
1/22 Why did Putin start the war and why are the western sanctions nowhere close to making him stop it? Great question, I am glad you asked. SANCTIONS THREAD 🧵🧵🧵. A little manual on how to make sanctions actually effective and what the real ‘mother of all sanctions’ could be.
@TClausen_ Nej, dette er ikke hvad M ønsker. Og det ved du udmærket. Dette er konkret et udfald af en beregning de ikke lan nå at lave om på nu inden valget. De ønsker reelt en politik der ikke gør disse grupper markant fattigere. Lyt til dem her. https://t.co/qVrfP4LqLK
@ammitzbollbille Du risikerer, at et stærkt reduceret R alligevel vil støtte en ren S-regering. Gys! Ren blå regering bliver det ikke, så her er der ikke meget forskel på LA og V. Med en stemme på M er du med til at styrke dem mod en evt armlægning med S.
@larsgaardhoj@AlexVanopslagh Det er en parodi over regeringens tendens til at ville bestemme mere og mere over andre menneskers liv. Her er et ikke fjernt men dog fremtidigt scenarie for hvordan det kan ende hvis det fortsætter.