This morning there was an article, quite naturally, in the media that the Pakistan Cricket Board Chairman Mohsin Naqvi was unhappy with the team's performance and conveyed his displeasure to the team manager.
And that one item explains the single largest reason, beyond the talent, beyond the money and the economics why Indian cricket today is far ahead of Pakistan cricket, and all other Indian sport.
For the truth is that in the 21st century at least, whatever happened in the BCCI board rooms did not impact how cricket was run on the ground.
I was in ESPN Star Sports when the BCCI was fighting a huge internal battle about broadcast rights, saw Sharad Pawar overthrow Dalmiya and his team, saw Lalit Modi and his vision for cricket.
Through that period, the age groups game went on, the Ranji trophy was played regularly. If anything, some of the Challenger and other formats were tweaked for better results. And the IPL was born
While at KKR, saw the IPL move to South Africa in a titanic battle between the BCCI and the home ministry. The change of IPL Commissioner, the fixing scam of 2013, the Mudgal committeee, the BCCI being run by an interim President from 2017, the return of the elected body.
Through all that India kept playing top level cricket, won two World Cups, dominated the Champions trophy, the test team won in Australia and the IPL just went from strength to strength.
There have been seismic changes in the BCCI, but the game on the ground remained unchanged, the show went on, and not one of the administrators allowed that to slip. Or allowed a President, be it Dalmiya or Pawar to dictate player selection for a tour, or saw a board member ordering the coach or captain to change a player.
The BCCI endured finally because of its fundamentally strong structure which allowed the game to be insulated from the politics of running a game.
And so while stars might come and stars might go, and administrators might come and go, Indian cricket goes on growing.
Other Indian sports have done well when driven by either a star perfomer or two or a charismatic administrator, but always stumbled when they left or retired
No other Indian sport has this powerful separation between the actual game and its administrators, and nor certainly does Pakistan cricket.
And that perhaps is the real story.
@cricketingview Curious if you did an analysis on the Ind v SA series for control and false shots. Just not able to get my head around Harmer/Maharaj outbowling Jaddu/Kuldeep/Sundar. Toss advantage aside, how luckier did SA get with false shots not resulting in a dismissal?
Here's a comparison of Test cricket during the Waugh/Ponting years (1999-08) and the Smith/Cummins years (2016-25) with the bowling averages by bowling position.
This is what I mean by deeper bowling. Many more top attacks in 16-25 compared to 99-08.
@the_kk Even if it is, and assuming the pitch follows a similar pattern to Perth (i.e ease out by post lunch Day 2), I’m afraid our bowlers wouldn’t get to enjoy the spiciness of the pitch for long enough as they did in Perth.
If some one told me 25 years ago that I would have a smart phone with me and the call log on the last day of my career as an Indian cricketer would look like this☺️☺️, I would have had a heart attack then only. Thanks @sachin_rt and @therealkapildev paaji🙏🙏 #blessed
We had a handful of Ravichandran Ashwin features ready for our broadcast over the next couple of Tests, but with his international retirement, we’ve decided to post them all right now to enjoy in this thread 🧵
@ashwinravi99 | @beastieboy07