Exploring the power of vision and values to transform leadership and shaping a better future » Generative Action » @Genratec @GenratecAlumni » 7000+ Alumni
The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees.
The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance.
Access to all other Claude models is not affected.
We apologize for this disruption to our customers. We believe this is a misunderstanding and are working to restore access as soon as possible.
Read our full statement: https://t.co/bwn0sximKZ
1/5 The metacrisis runs deeper than most accounts suggest. Beneath the visible crises of governance and climate lies a more fundamental problem: the fragmentation of knowledge itself.
Check out my latest article: The Invisible Constraints
Some leaders are carrying a level of complexity their environment cannot yet metabolise.
They can see the systemic dynamics.
The hidden leverage points.
The future consequences before they become visible in the metrics.
And often, they quietly begin to wonder:
“Is it me?”
This article explores why that experience is becoming more common, especially for leaders developing beyond conventional worldviews.
https://t.co/cPGUegYAq9
Exactly. And here’s what that means:
The Goldwater Rule is an ethical guideline established by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in 1973
It prohibits psychiatrists from offering a professional opinion (including a diagnosis) about the mental health of a public figure whom they have not personally examined and from whom they have not obtained proper authorization.
They can still share general expertise about psychiatric issues with the public, but they must refrain from speculative commentary on specific individuals in the media or elsewhere.
@Eileen2sr@bmj_latest I’m not making any case for or against Trump.
Just that psychiatric professionalism is hurt when its practitioners do not follow professional processes.
@Endsofinve18158@bmj_latest Without a diagnosis, there is no prognosis. I’m remarking on psychiatrists not following a professional process.
Privately they can hold whatever opinions they wish but as soon as they publish it as a professional they make their own process a joke.
@HeidiBrave@bmj_latest I’m making no comment about Trump.
But your claim that we don’t need a diagnosis is exactly what we expect from a psychiatrist. And without a diagnosis there is no prognosis worthy of any professional.
Imagine every pixel on your screen, streamed live directly from a model. No HTML, no layout engine, no code. Just exactly what you want to see.
@eddiejiao_obj, @drewocarr and I built a prototype to see how this could actually work, and set out to make it real. We're calling it Flipbook. (1/5)
The New Scarcity is Human
In 1983, Steve Jobs said computers were “really dumb” but incredibly fast. Humans were extraordinarily intelligent, but often painfully slow.
AI has now amplified that distinction.
AI can process for you.
Only humans can understand.
AI can generate language, strategy, code, analysis and content at near infinite scale. It can imitate insight with astonishing fluency. But processing is not understanding.
A synthetic leadership philosophy is not lived leadership.
A symbol of care is not care itself.
A simulation of judgement is not accountability.
This is the great inversion now underway.
For two centuries, industrial systems rewarded information, efficiency, repetition and optimisation. AI is commoditising those capacities. When everyone can produce almost anything instantly, production loses scarcity value.
But… then value migrates upward.
Toward intention.
Toward context.
Toward discernment.
Toward ethics.
Toward meaning.
Toward wisdom.
The future advantage will not belong to those who merely use AI to accelerate output. It will belong to those who can generate coherent direction amidst overwhelming synthetic noise.
AI can optimise pathways.
Only humans can decide which destinations are worthy.
The deeper risk is not that machines become human.
It is that humans become increasingly machine-like, optimised for speed while disconnected from meaning, value, and purpose.
The more intelligence becomes artificial and abundant, the more precious genuine humanity becomes.
@KobeissiLetter Where trust falls, money has to go somewhere. If traditional options are untrusted, other options are explored because they are deemed as risky-. That’s a system response.
Functional MRIs have shown that the language centre of the brain is in a different region to the thinking centre. Most of what we have emulated is the superficial calculation around language rather than any accurate thinking. This is even before we consider consciousness, for which we have no real mapping. The anthropomorphising of computational language into pseudo identities creates a mythology (distinct from a reality). So the double meaning of your article title is very apt on both counts.