0/ 🧵 NO us heu sorprès, des de fa un temps, que a l'entrada de Barcelona ha aparegut un gratacels de 25 plantes enmig del no-res?
Aquesta torre. La que veieu venint per la Diagonal o la Ronda de Dalt. Doncs té una explicació. I no és la que us han venut com a "districte d'innovació en salut".
Te tota una trama que explica com funciona aquest país 👇
Me cansé de hacer la compra desde la web de Mercadona.
Así que convertí la API de Mercadona en una CLI.
Ahora cualquier agente de IA (o tú) puede buscar productos, gestionar el carrito y automatizar la compra desde la terminal.
Es open source:
https://t.co/XlW9qJn8UH
Os voy a contar una historia real. Una empresa con dos autónomos societarios, sin empleados. Con Holded se nos va a 50€ al mes. No está mal. Pero ….
Y si le pido a Códex que me lo haga? Y si le pido que analice mi correo para extraer las facturas, y si….
La nueva empresa de Bertin Osborne "Española Telefonia", dice que te realiza un test de velocidad de tu conexión y en su código fuente se ve que el test no existe y que elige un numero aleatorio en 50 y 250 Mb, para venderte su conexión.
Menuda estafa, española, eso si.
🧵 1/14
Hem trobat una frontera invisible al Baix Llobregat.
A un costat, els contractes públics es decideixen a dit, sense que ningú pugui competir-hi.
A l'altre, no.
La frontera coincideix, gairebé clavada, amb el mapa electoral del PSC.
Obro fil. I porto dades. 🔴
NEW: malware developers added nuclear & biological weapons text to to their spyware.
Goal? To trigger LLM safety refusals... so that their spyware wouldn't be analyzed by an AI security scanner.
Cleanest practical example I can think of for why over-indexing on first order safety alignment is risky.
When closed (and open) models ship with aggressive refusals, they will be sprinkled with second-order blindspots that attackers will discover...and exploit.
We are only in the earliest days of attackers leveraging these features, and it wouldn't surprise me if users systems that need to handle complex cybersecurity issues demand that models be less safety-blunted.
In the weeds: @SocketSecurity's post also shows why intention matters in how you design a malware analysis pipeline to avoid prompt manipulation.
H/T to colleagues that shared this with me https://t.co/f3Aj9TYxU4
Remember when people were posting "this one prompt replaces a McKinsey consultant"?
McKinsey published an 8-page guide teaching Fortune 500 companies how to replace 60% of their dev teams with AI agent factories.
They weren't the ones getting replaced. They were studying the replacement playbook the entire time.
The article lays out a 24-hour sprint model. Humans work 8 hours during the day reviewing outputs, setting guardrails, aligning priorities. AI agents execute the other 16 hours overnight. Requirements, architecture, code, testing. All automated.
The team composition chart tells the real story. Old model: product owner, business analyst, tech lead, 6 engineers, 2 testers. Ten people. New model: product owner, tech lead, one AI-enabled engineer. Three people.
Business analysts gone. Testers gone. Five out of six engineers gone. Not "reassigned." Removed from the org chart entirely.
The article calls it "productivity gains" and "team resizing." The diagrams call it what it is. 100 FTEs down to 60. 200 person-years of work compressed into 100. And McKinsey is selling this transformation as a service.
The people who survive this shift aren't the ones writing the best code. They're the ones who can think clearly enough to direct the agents that write it.
Our internal data shows Claude is accelerating AI development—a possible path to recursive self-improvement, or AI autonomously building a more capable successor.
It’s happening faster than we thought, and the implications deserve greater attention. https://t.co/OVVPJO7VQx