Ralph Gabriel

ENFP-T | He/Him/His | 💼 Sr Software Engineer | 🐷

[Ralph Gabriel @aldabarg]

Hi friend, I just want to let you know that I'm always cheering for your success even if you don't know me anymore. 😊🤗

[Ralph Gabriel @aldabarg]

Ang panget ng sistema sa shore. Ikot daw pag walang parking. I complied. Tapos makikita mo pag-ikot, may pila ulet and they allowed it. lol

[Ralph Gabriel @aldabarg]

One day, you'll understand the frustration. 🙃

[Ralph Gabriel @aldabarg]

May kasama pa siyang isang nagpalit din ng name. Haha!

[kim ✶ | iska 🌻 @kimkiamz]

napa notaryo na siya

[Ralph Gabriel @aldabarg]

Same route for the second time, but my third time doing a half mary. Not planning on any PR attempts (yet)—doing this will help me forget the heavy things at least for a while. Best of luck to all the runners across all categories! Legs, go! ✨

[𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗻𝘆🫧💚 @beyoncegarden]

the way my jaw didn’t stop dropping like she ate this omfg😭

[Dear Self. @Dearme2_]

I affirm.

[Ralph Gabriel @aldabarg]

💙: https://t.co/xrwxPQDggz
🧡: https://t.co/ToyxOMgiTg

[Ralph Gabriel @aldabarg]

Unexpected find sa Kultura SM Makati. Tried it out and honestly? May ibang atake! If mahilig kayo sa Salted Egg snacks, this is definitely a must-try. Pasok sa banga. 💯

Double checked and buti na lang available din siya online shop for cravings delivery. 🥹✨

[Ralph Gabriel @aldabarg]

He's very pleasant and accommodating. Cyrus easily earns a spot in my top-tier personal list of recommended therapists. ⭐

https://t.co/sd8YdQ3fJB

[URBN WELLNESS SPA @hazilyn_Urbn]

𝐁𝐎𝐎𝐊 𝐍𝐎𝐖
📞 𝟎𝟗𝟔𝟐𝟕𝟕𝟗𝟗𝟔𝟎𝟓/📞𝟎𝟗𝟗𝟒𝟓𝟓𝟎𝟓𝟒𝟐𝟔

𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭𝐬𝐚𝐩𝐩/𝐕𝐢𝐛𝐞𝐫/𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦💬
𝒘𝒆 𝒂𝒄𝒄𝒆𝒑𝒕 𝒘𝒂𝒍𝒌 𝒊𝒏/𝑯𝒐𝒕𝒆𝒍 𝒔𝒆𝒓𝒗𝒊𝒄𝒆✨
@simplyme101486
@iamsuperking31

[Ralph Gabriel @aldabarg]

Another exp at @hazilyn_Urbn, last time was with MT @CyrusCruz59492. The scrub was incredibly thorough. Just a heads up, the rooms are freezing so brace yourself! Haha
I went with hard pressure, and he maintained a deep, solid, and consistent diin sa back the entire time.

[Maritessy | WilCa Delulu | All Things Reality TV @CollabS12PBB]

Thank you so much for bringing up SP Cayetano's clarification on what the Dividing The House mean

But, it actually weakens the Majority's case

Let's study what happened:

1. “May 11 pa na-present” said by Sen. Marcoleta. But that's not the full story

Yes, Marcoleta raised the motion on May 11.

But Lacson rebutted the May 11 records showed the matter was referred to the Committee on Rules, and Cayetano confirmed that during interpellation.

That matters because once referred, the committee process should apply (Senate PH Rule XI, Section 24)

2. Lacson’s point: Rule 136 does not erase the committee referral.

Cayetano relied on Senate PH Rule LI, Section 136 to combat Rule XI, Section 24, which allows amendment of Senate Rules by motion if presented one day before consideration.

But Lacson’s answer was - that applies if there was no referral.

Since the motion was already presented AND was already referred to Rules Committee, Rule XI and Section 24 should supercede Rule LI Section 136

quoting:
"(that was referred)... committees must meet, discuss, decide, and submit a report."

3. The Committee on Rules was not properly functioning - because of the removal of Senate President Sotto.

Lacson said all posts had been declared vacant after the May 11 leadership change.

So there was no chairman or members of the Committee on Rules. But the matter was already referred

(ie: Napunta na yung motion sa Committee on Rules, pero dahil wala pang chairmanship or hindi pa na-constitute ang bagong committee, hindi pa siya naasikaso)

Lacson's question was simple: how can the Committee On Rules act if it had not even been constituted?

4. Sotto backed the process argument.

Sotto reportedly said the Committee on Rules should first be constituted before the motion is discussed.

He also objected as an ex officio member, asking in Taglish: “Tumawag ba? Ano ’to binabraso?”

In other words, even the Minority Leader was saying the process looked like strong-arming or bulldozing the process by skipping the Committee on Rules.

5. The Motion to divide the house curtails Rule XI, Section 24

Tama ka! Hindi automatically mali ang “motion to divide the House.”

Ang mali ay ginamit ito to force plenary action on a controversial Senate Rules amendment while the proposal had already been referred to the Committee on Rules

Wala pang malinaw na committee action or report from the very Committee. That's why the process seemed suspiciously being railroaded.

6. So why was it railroading for Cayetano to start to Divide The House and debate.

Because if that motion passed, the Senate would effectively move straight to plenary action while skipping the Committee on Rules step.

And that step matters.

Doon dapat dini-discuss ang pros, cons, safeguards, loopholes, quorum, voting, and consequences of changing the Senate Rules.

Pero hindi pa iyon nagagawa.
No proper committee meeting.
No decision.
No report.

So hindi ito simpleng “procedural vote lang.”

Once the Senate agrees to take it up in plenary, the Majority can move quickly - sponsorship, interpellation, amendments, then adoption and within the session.

Simple majority votes lang ang kailangan.

So basically, if the division of the House passed, the Senate would be acting as if: “Tapos na ang Committee on Rules. Decision time na.”

But that was exactly the deliberation.
Hindi pa tapos ang proseso - yan ang ungol ng Minority

7. If the Dividing The House motion passed, the Majority is basically saying, "tapos na ang Committee on Rules", decision time na.

“Tapos na ang Committee on Rules. Decision time na.”

But that was exactly the problem.

The Committee on Rules was not properly constituted. No proper committee deliberation had happened. No report had been submitted.

So when Cayetano says he only wanted to bring it back to plenary “to deliberate,” that sounds reasonable but it misses the point or even hiding an uglier motive.

Plenary deliberation will replace Committee on Rules deliberation.

So bringing it straight to plenary was not just “for deliberation.” It was a shortcut hidden as a "discuss na natin dito"

They wanted to skip the Committee on Rules process because they had the numbers.

So the Minority walked out because they refused to legitimize a shortcut.

"For Deliberation" sabi ni Cayetano shall not be used as an excuse to avoid deliberation on Committee on Rules, yan ang reply ng Minority

WHICH IS SUMMARIZED IN:
You cannot ask to change the Rules of the Senate while ignoring the Rules of the Senate.

That is not procedure.
That is railroading dressed up as procedure.

Cayetano is saying "procedure 'to" BUT intentionally skipping ACTUAL PROCEDURE

[Karen Davila @iamkarendavila]

Senators were seen crying yesterday as a colleague was being arrested for plunder.

This is in no way an indictment of the accused senator but I would like to remind our lawmakers…

Iyakan n’yo ang ninanakawang Pilipino.
Iyakan n’yo ang binabaha dahil sa nakawan sa flood control.
Iyakan n’yo ang gutom nating mga kababayan.

Get out of your bubble. Please.

[rojer @jerronor]

sharmaine

[Ralph Gabriel @aldabarg]

Sobrang oks si boss! Hard kung hard ang pressure. 💯

[Zeus @ChristianD90781]

Hi 🙂
Visits napo kayo dito sa @CocoonSpa244867

Mt Zeus

📌Puregold Jr timog

[Ralph Gabriel @aldabarg]

As I enter this path which I have laid out and discerned with You, please guide me. I pray no harm comes my way as You walk with me through this. ✨🙏🏻🪬

[Ralph Gabriel @aldabarg]

Unfortunately, this product was discontinued na pala. I bought a similar product from a different store. Same experience parin!

💙: https://t.co/NppBwUaVuS
🧡: https://t.co/npUobYujEm

[Ralph Gabriel @aldabarg]

Found a much portable 3-in-1 magsafe charger for your iPhone, watch, and airpods! The base also works for other devices with wireless charging capability!

You can also use LAZAFF150 for 10% discount up to Php150.00!

https://t.co/v01WkfxYlS
https://t.co/v01WkfxYlS

[hopie @ayuhopie]

PAPALDO KAYA NGAYONG MAY 🪬🪄

[Ralph Gabriel @aldabarg]

I hope HKDL release their pre-momentous 20th year anniversary soundtrack. ✨

[Fr. Myke, MSC @popmonkph]

Isn't it too convenient that they could not show the senate's CCTV footages last night?

[Karen Davila @iamkarendavila]

Watch @ZyannAmbrosio’s exclusive report. Here, NBI agents were at the GSIS side.

In our interview with OSAA Head Gen Aplasca, he claims there were NBI agents who were at the “edge of senate property” which led them to firing warning shots leading to an exchange.

The CCTV footage will help reveal the truth.