This is a good word:
Sonder (from The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows). “Sonder n. the realization that each random passerby is living a life as vivid and complex as your own—populated with their own ambitions, friends, routines, worries and inherited craziness..." Via @tferriss
“BREAKING NEWS”
Tucson PD Investigating Suspicious White Powdery Substance.
We now have some answers. Thank you for your patience. See video for details.
🦅
More hugging 🤗
The man in the video saved the life of the condor who fell from the nest as a young chick. He cared for the bird and later returned it to the wild.
The bird hasn't forgotten his kindness and sometimes flies back to visit him.
@Kellblog @skyviewPaul @WalshFreedom Sounds like some sort of wishful thinking/optimistic beliefs based bias, but not sure. This Piketty paper develops a rational learning model that describes this behavior, I think!
https://t.co/M0Wgtp3p8A
@nickchk Sorry, we’re having two conversations in this thread haha! But yes, you’re definitely right that it still makes reference to the whole population.
@nickchk I think in this particular model they could go in different directions. I think the intuition is something like “people overweight characteristics that are somehow striking”, so they might attribute that feature to the whole group even if it’s not particularly common.
@nickchk I think it does, but I usually think of it as taking the most typical/salient example of a characteristic and applying that to the whole population.
As requested, slower graphs! Also added a graph on collider bias, the webpage explanation helps there.
These graphs are intended to show what standard causal inference methods actually *do* to data, and how they work.
This is what controlling for a binary variable looks like: