@DamonPetty6@wideawake_media The ~30 Gt of CO2 from human activities, though small compared to natural fluxes, accumulates because it exceeds the capacity of natural sinks to absorb it fully. This accumulation is indeed responsible for a significant portion of the enhanced greenhouse effect observed today.
@JTFRanchTX@StreamingSeagu1 @cbrblly @ChrisMartzWX Zero substance argument. Just an NPC criticism of a clearly useful technology. Maybe I should go to the library and do research the “old way”
@cbrblly @ChrisMartzWX Oooh, someone’s getting a lil spicy! It doesn’t allow me to “just share it” genius.
Here’s the link to the automatically redacted prompt, which I already shared in one of these godforsaken threads. https://t.co/HUkIbqhZcK
@r_u_thinking @cbrblly @ChrisMartzWX You obviously didn’t read it and can only attack AI with NPC and troglodyte level reflexive criticism. So fun that I’ll be able to use it forever to refute idiocy.
And yes, Cyberbully is the dudes username
@SamGilson13@ChrisMartzWX Frankly Mr. Sam, you sound like the one who doesn’t want to learn.
And what does Satan have to do with this? Some people just want to live on an earth that hasn’t been spoiled by pollution.
@ChrisMartzWX I told you I wasn’t an expert. I’m also not an expert in gravity but I can accept the overwhelming evidence it exists. I simply asked an LLM if your claims were accurate or worth refuting. It’s nice having tools like this now. Trying to argue in good faith here.
@ChrisMartzWX Why should I have to? It’s an extremely complicated science and you’re trying to reason with people on Twitter rather than the literature.