Alexey

[Alexey @AlexeySloth]

@WhaleFactor Lol the end of March already, but the post is paid of course

[Alexey @AlexeySloth]

@LiveArtX Art is scam, shame on bybit and kraken.

[Alexey @AlexeySloth]

@virtuals_io you are scammers guys. you gave one token and after that another token. And ppl could trade the first token even in your platform. clear scam from your platform

[Symbiotic @symbioticfi]

The Summer of Symbiotic continues with @hyperlane on @Galxe

- Dive into the @hyperlane documentation
- Learn how Hyperlane works
- Experience crosschain communication

Link below:

[Symbiotic @symbioticfi]

The Summer of Symbiotic is starting on @Galxe!

Throughout the summer, we’ll be dropping new tracks filled with quests, content, and alpha from the teams actually building with universal staking.

[Moody 💭 @sendmoodz]

Can't say this enough: TWAMM good.

After we deploy it at the end of this month, we will create diversification proposals for the biggest DAO treasuries. What DAOs need more than anything is some real diversification. Diversification of stakeholders and treasury assets both.

TWAMM directly enables this: anyone can create a proposal to sell DAO treasury assets for any other token over a fixed period of time. No need to provide liquidity. No need to find a buyer. No off-chain, trusted or third party deals. Pure decentralized finance.

Why is it good for a DAO to sell its own token? It gives an opportunity for new, real stakeholders to join the DAO. Rather than "service providers" who stake nothing and receive large grants that they immediately sell. Or private illiquid deals at preferential prices. Real stakeholders that financially commit to growing the DAO.

It's a completely open auction for a piece of the pie. These stakeholders join the DAO by way of public sale. And the DAO also benefits by diversifying its treasury assets, e.g. selling its tokens for USDC or ETH.

DAOs can even use the sale to form partnerships with others by selling their own protocol token for another's. Imagine Aave DAO exchanging $20m in AAVE for LDO. The market participates in price discovery so both parties get a fair price. Partnerships can be formed with an order of magnitude less coordination.

I'm very excited to see how such a powerful tool changes the DAO landscape. Live on Ethereum mainnet in less than one month, only on @EkuboProtocol

[Moody 💭 @sendmoodz]

Some swaps will be even cheaper 🤫

@EkuboProtocol V2 on EVM makes no compromises: most gas efficient, most capital efficient, most useful (Oracle, and soon DCA)

2 audits starting tomorrow and we're targeting mid-March for launch

[Ekubo @EkuboProtocol]

We would like to apologize to our community for misinforming them. While we strive to be precise, we can't always get things right. Ekubo Protocol will come to mainnet in January.

[Bark Ruffalo @TrulyADog]

The Bark Ruffalo #DAO currently owns 228,055,011 $PAWSY and 126,621 VIRTUAL (includes op. funds + add liq. refund that V.P. confirmed we'll receive in a few weeks), and it's getting 0.3% on each trade. We'll have a page on the website that tracks the current portfolio because my spreadsheet is unintelligible.

For those who aren't in our Telegram group, a short explanation of the photo: I added from my own funds the VIRTUAL that $PAWSY is trading against, and the pool also contains the team funds (two beautiful devs that don't sleep).

[Bark Ruffalo @TrulyADog]

There is a big bug with @virtuals_io (Virtuals Protocol). It's a contract issue in AgentToken.sol—it affects all builders on the platform. It affects everybody starting an AI agent through their UI. It affects the most supportive users of tokens on their platform, who add to the LP (liquidity pool where their token is trading against $VIRTUAL).
Problem: The 1% transfer fee is not taken only for buy and sell taxes; it’s also taken when interacting with the LP (by adding or removing liquidity).

Virtuals Protocol team:
- Please refund all who added liquidity to Bark Ruffalo's LP (the 1% lost in $PAWSY would be enough, even though the loss is actually higher since they're getting 0.3% trading fees on a lower amount, and the subsequent sale of $PAWSY by V.P. was made against their LP, contributing to price decline). You have a lot of funds, but our DAO and most helpful holders (who contributed to the LP) don’t.
- Please fix the token contract so that it doesn’t ever happen again for any builder—not just ourselves.

In the screenshot, we made a transaction to add the LP, with what was DAO funds + operational funds + the funds of both devs. Notice how we threw 5 million $PAWSY into the trash, and even worse, the price dropped afterward because it sold automatically against our LP.
Transaction 0x071a9c66cebf20b8e5eaddbde2cce64244772b5d24ec04ea5d69053210756f91.

[Bark Ruffalo @TrulyADog]

CAN YOU SEE IT???

@virtuals_io #AIAgent

[Bark Ruffalo @TrulyADog]

New functionality added to the @virtuals_io #AIAgent token sniper. Let's say you activate 8 of the available 11 filters. You can also set, let's say, a minimum of 6, and if any 6 of the eight filters pass, the token purchase is triggered... with ALL the accounts loaded.

[Alexey @AlexeySloth]

₿itcoin’s wild side, amplified. @SideProtocol
$SIDE Genesis Drop: https://t.co/rMyMiDwhAb

[Bark Ruffalo @TrulyADog]

That is because we just added a ton of $VIRTUAL and $PAWSY to the liquidity pool. And some of the PAWSY that have been added are the 30% owned by the DAO, which means that starting today, 24 hours after launch, our DAO is already generating income (0.3% of trading fees). The rest are funds from the two developers and the operational budget, which we weren't planning on using anyway until the market cap passes $9 million. And we have dollars anyway.

[Alexey @AlexeySloth]

@nostrafinance lol what a shame

[Alexey @AlexeySloth]

@auroraisnear Ahaha

[Alexey @AlexeySloth]

@ColinTCrypto got it, thanks

[Alexey @AlexeySloth]

@Starkurabu 5 sec is fake. 7k+ minted. Hole in the contract. Awful work.

[Alexey @AlexeySloth]

@OwlStarknet scam