@mohmahfudmd Bukannya gak bagus prof? Karena pemberantasan korupsinya bukan by system. Kalau dengan kondisi sekarang, yang terjadi adalah saling sandera. Bukan karena niat pemberantasan korupsi.
Focusing on rhetorics like “taubat ekologis” without quantifying risk or specifying how forests are actually managed replaces thinking with emotion. It feels morally elevated, but it does no analytical work. Repentance is a theological concept; ecosystems collapse according to physics, mechanics, and thresholds. Nature does not respond to remorse.
When policy discourse is framed in moral symbolism rather than testable questions, emotion inevitably prevails over thinking. No one is forced to ask: how much forest, where, of what type, on what slope, with what hydrological and mechanical effect, over what time horizon. Without those questions, there is no learning, no falsification, and no accountability — only repetition.
You cannot bypass thinking by invoking virtue. A sound response to ecological risk demands research questions that constrain reality, not slogans that soothe conscience. Until governance is willing to replace moral theatre with quantification (risk curves, failure thresholds, trade-offs) disaster will continue to be narrated, not prevented.
Jika kepantasan berkembang biak itu di-gatekeep dari muka, maka dalam beberapa generasi, peradaban akan runtuh.
Kenapa? Karena memaksimalkan pilihan dari satu ciri bawaan takdir (kecakepan) itu menyingkirkan ciri2 lainnya seperti keberanian, keuletan, kesetiaan, kemampuan, dst.
@nay_Thahir Kalau tinggi rendah pengaturan itu soal trajectori yang berhubungan dengan kurva. Kalau sudut itu berhubungan dgn trigonometri. Ribet amat hidup bahas math pas gituan. Di sekolah aja pusing belajarnya. Kenapa gak ngobrol soal arah kiblat ketika pindah ke Mars aja?
Biro Buzzer di Kementerian Pertanian
Kementerian Pertanian mengerahkan birokrat, mahasiswa, dan pelajar untuk menyerang Tempo. Menggaungkan citra positif Menteri Pertanian Amran Sulaiman.