@suchwinningwow@Nganga_one@elonmusk Shutdown math is simple:
The party demanding policy changes in exchange for funding is usually seen as "pushing the shutdown".
The party refusing those changes is seen as "allowing the shutdown".
Both narratives can be true at the same time.
Nah the receipts say the exact opposite of "signs were all there". Karmelo Anthony had a clean criminal record
zero arrests
zero juvenile offensesbefore this incident.
Its explicitly cited that he had a clean record plus his straight-A grades, athletic achievements, and community ties.
No police reports, school discipline records, or court docs have surfaced showing any prior "thug" behavior or red flags his parents supposedly ignored. The defense has painted him as a 130lb epilepsy kid who was smaller than the twin brothers he clashed with, and he immediately admitted what he did, dropped the knife, walked to a coach, and asked if the victim was okay...none of which screams "career criminal raised by negligent parents".
Self-defense is the core argument, with prosecutors saying he provoked it and the defense saying he feared for his life after being grabbed. Either way, pinning "criminal negligence" on the parents for a first-time incident with zero documented prior warnings is pure speculation and bad-faith narrative-pushing.
Trial still playing out. Let the jury decide the case...not Twitter fake azz parenting experts.
You're out here calling people out as "bullsht"... blaming parents for "murderous thugs" floating "nationalist just shy of Hitler" takes praising nick fukface Fuentes and questioning someone's "brown 3rd world immigrant" spouse. Same energy as your own older posts pushing one-day voting + paper ballots + photo ID. You clearly want election integrity... until GOP doesn't deliver the nuclear option you demand, then it's all "scam".
What a Low IQ weirdo.
Keep treating it like a scam and you'll get exactly the outcome you're raging about.
Nah the receipts say the exact opposite of "signs were all there". Karmelo Anthony had a clean criminal record
zero arrests
zero juvenile offensesbefore this incident.
Its explicitly cited that he had a clean record plus his straight-A grades, athletic achievements, and community ties.
No police reports, school discipline records, or court docs have surfaced showing any prior "thug" behavior or red flags his parents supposedly ignored. The defense has painted him as a 130lb epilepsy kid who was smaller than the twin brothers he clashed with, and he immediately admitted what he did, dropped the knife, walked to a coach, and asked if the victim was okay...none of which screams "career criminal raised by negligent parents".
Self-defense is the core argument, with prosecutors saying he provoked it and the defense saying he feared for his life after being grabbed. Either way, pinning "criminal negligence" on the parents for a first-time incident with zero documented prior warnings is pure speculation and bad-faith narrative-pushing.
Trial still playing out. Let the jury decide the case...not Twitter fake azz parenting experts.
Nah the receipts say the exact opposite of "signs were all there". Karmelo Anthony had a clean criminal record
zero arrests
zero juvenile offensesbefore this incident.
Its explicitly cited that he had a clean record plus his straight-A grades, athletic achievements, and community ties.
No police reports, school discipline records, or court docs have surfaced showing any prior "thug" behavior or red flags his parents supposedly ignored. The defense has painted him as a 130lb epilepsy kid who was smaller than the twin brothers he clashed with, and he immediately admitted what he did, dropped the knife, walked to a coach, and asked if the victim was okay...none of which screams "career criminal raised by negligent parents".
Self-defense is the core argument, with prosecutors saying he provoked it and the defense saying he feared for his life after being grabbed. Either way, pinning "criminal negligence" on the parents for a first-time incident with zero documented prior warnings is pure speculation and bad-faith narrative-pushing.
Trial still playing out. Let the jury decide the case...not Twitter fake azz parenting experts.
Trumpโs blanket pardon covered ~1,600 Jan. 6 defendants ... including over 600 convicted or who pleaded guilty to assaulting/obstructing law enforcement officers, and 170 who used deadly or dangerous weapons.
Hundreds beat cops with flagpoles, bats, bear spray, stun guns, and stolen riot shields.
Examples:
โข Daniel Rodriguez tased Officer Michael Fanone in the neck repeatedly while the mob screamed โKill him!โ (Fanone had a heart attack). Rodriguez got 12+ years... then pardoned.
โข Patrick McCaughey crushed Officer Daniel Hodges in a doorframe with a stolen shield. Trump appointee judge called it โsome of the most egregious crimesโ that day. Pardoned.
โข Dozens more had prior violent records (rape, assault, manslaughter).
Not โpeaceful touristsโ Over 400 were charged with violence. The DOJ and courts documented it all.
If youโre cool with pardoning people who tried to murder cops on live TV, own it. But donโt pretend they were all harmless grandmas. Receipts donโt lie.
Not exactly. "He can bomb at will" is not what the Constitution says.
Yes. Even if Congress passes a War Powers Resolution, the President can veto it. Then Congress would need a 2/3 vote in both the House and Senate to override the veto.
The resolution probably won't stop Trump by itself, but it can absolutely limit, challenge, and politically constrain his actions. The Senate and any veto fight are where the real battle would be.
The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war. Presidents have some authority to respond to immediate threats, but Congress can still vote to limit, end, or refuse funding for military action.
The real question isn't whether a president can order a strike. It's whether they can keep escalating a conflict indefinitely without Congress.
Presidents have limited military authority. Congress still controls war declarations and the money needed to sustain a war. That's literally why the War Powers Act exists.
If presidents could just bomb whoever they wanted whenever they wanted, Congress wouldn't need war powers, authorizations, or military appropriations.
Civics isn't everyone's strong suit, I guess. ๐๐คท๐พโโ๏ธ
What have left-handed people done for a country? What have blue-eyed people done? That's how ridiculous this dumb ass question is. LGBTQ people have been soldiers, scientists, doctors, firefighters, engineers, judges, and elected officials. The question falls apart the second you think about it for more than 10 seconds ๐
Alan Turing helped crack Nazi Germany's Enigma code and is considered a father of modern computing. Alan Turing
Sally Ride was the first American woman in space.
Bayard Rustin was a chief organizer of the 1963 March on Washington and a key strategist behind the civil rights movement.
Millions of LGBTQ Americans have served in the U.S. military, including during World War II, Korean War, and Vietnam War.
So the real question isn't...What have LGBTQ people done for any country?... It's...How many contributions have you ignored because you were too busy worrying about who people love? ๐
Funny how Obama is still responsible for everything 10 years later, but Trump only gets credit for good things that happened 10 minutes ago. If gas prices are Trump's achievement, then own the prices when they go up too. Can't have it both ways
Obama left office in 2017. If gas drops 15 cents in 2026, somehow that's Trump fixing Obama. But when gas spikes because of refinery outages, OPEC cuts, wars, hurricanes, or seasonal demand, suddenly presidents don't control gas prices anymore.
Obama's Iran deal froze parts of Iran's nuclear program, put inspectors on the ground, and exchanged access to Iranian money that was already theirs under sanctions relief. It wasn't a pallet of free cash handed over as a gift.... genius ๐
Trump pulled out of the deal, Iran ramped up enrichment afterward, and now the same people are acting like bombing Iran is proof the original agreement failed.
The bigotry is thinking your family deserves respect while somebody else's deserves ridicule because of who they love.
And spare me the "making America great" Low IQ magacult bullshyt. LGBTQ Americans have fought in wars, advanced medicine, built companies, taught generations of kids, and helped put this country on the map scientifically and technologically.
Meanwhile, your contribution to America appears to be whining on twitter about other people's existence. ๐
๐ this Dunce azz comment is especially dumb because a War Powers Resolution is real policy. It's literally Congress exercising one of its core constitutional powers: deciding whether the U.S. stays involved in a military conflict.
Imagine thinking preventing another endless Middle East war isn't "real policy". Congress debating war powers is literally one of the most important policy responsibilities it has. But sure, bombing countries without congressional oversight is apparently the serious governing you were looking for.
Nothing says "I don't know how government works" quite like calling a War Powers Resolution "not real policy". That's like calling a fire extinguisher "not real firefighting" while the building is burning. ๐คฆ๐พโโ๏ธ
Your claim that LGBT acceptance "ALWAYS precedes the collapse of countries" is debunked by the very civilizations you probably think prove your point. Let's run the receipts.
Ancient Greece didn't collapse from "degenerate behavior"...it built Western civilization while normalizing same-sex relationships. Pederasty and male-male bonds were common, especially in elite and military circles (hello, Sacred Band of Thebes, the elite unit of male lovers who crushed Sparta). Philosophers, poets, and warriors embraced it as part of life. Greece's golden age gave us democracy, philosophy (Plato, Aristotle), math, and drama. It didn't "collapse" from tolerance...it got conquered militarily by Macedonia and later Rome. No historian blames the gays.
Rome? Homosexuality was widespread and tolerated for centuries...during its rise and peak, not its fall. Emperors like Hadrian (who deified his male lover Antinous) and plenty of others were openly into it. Same-sex stuff was part of Roman life from the Republic onward, with the usual active/passive norms. The Western Empire fell in 476 AD due to barbarian invasions, economic collapse, military overstretch, corruption, inflation, and the East-West split. Historians (actual ones, not Twitter randos) don't list homosexuality as a factor.
No empire fell *because* it tolerated gay people. Plenty fell while being prudish.
Fast-forward to today: Data shows the opposite of your "fact". Countries with stronger LGBT rights and higher acceptance have higher GDP per capita, Human Development Index (HDI), and stability. One extra legal right for LGB people correlates with ~$1,400โ$2,000 more in per-capita GDP and better well-being. Wealthier, more developed nations (Sweden, Netherlands, Germany) lead in acceptance AND prosperity. Tolerance doesn't cause collapse...it's a feature of successful, open societies.
Your "poo and degenerate" bit is just lazy reductionism. People's identities aren't defined by one act (plenty of straight folks do anal too, by the way). LGBT folks build businesses, serve in militaries, raise families, and contribute like anyone else. Championing them doesn't tank countries...bigotry and ignoring real causes (economics, invasions, corruption) does.
History isn't on your side, chief. It's on the side of facts over fearmongering. ๐ฉ
Bold claim with zero receipts. Public crime stats (FBI UCR, state arrest data) don't even track offender sexual orientation for indecent exposure or flashing offenses. There's simply no national dataset showing LGBTQI+ people commit the majority...or even a disproportionate share...of these incidents.
What we do know:
The vast majority of sex offenses, including child sexual abuse and indecent exposure patterns (flashers targeting women/children), are committed by heterosexual men. Studies of convicted offenders consistently show homosexual adults are not more likely to molest children or commit these acts than heterosexuals.