Ibn al-Qayyim رحمه الله wrote:
“They came to Arafah seeking mercy and forgiveness from the Most Generous...
And Allah draws near and boasts of them to His angels.”
#Arafah#DhulHijjah#Eid
🌿 Virtues of the Day of Arafah 🌿
1️⃣ Allah swore by this day in the Qur’an — and that alone is an immense honour.
“The witnessed day” was explained by the companions as the Day of Arafah.
6️⃣ Allah boasts to the angels about the people of Arafah:
“There is no day on which Allah frees more people from the Fire than the Day of Arafah.”
So blessed is the one who fills this day with sincere du‘a 🤍
I'll be debating Tommy Robinson at the Oxford Union inshallah. I was sent an invitation in early April and was the first to be invited. I've debated Tommy before (https://t.co/anzMS1Ic87) and I'm glad many Muslims share my view thaylt he should be publicly held to account
An absolute PERFORMANCE tonight by @MrAdnanRashid & @DWI_MImtiaz MashaAllah !!
Way too many DIRECT questions left COMPLETELY unanswered by the Qadiyanis.
While Br Adnan and Br Imtiyaz REPEATEDLY stated their CLEAR fatwas!
Here’s some funny live reaction clips as I recorded from my phone 😂😂 Had my turn to sit back with popcorn for the very halal entertainment🍿!
PS .. when we say they don’t actually study or learn Arabic .. we mean it 😭
“BatalOO al-istidlal” — Arabic fail !
“YUD-KHILU” — Distorting Qur’an !
“Mantle of Muhammadness” — muhammadness?
“Musaylima son of Kathaab” — naming a guy who never existed !
🤦♂️😅
Comedy GOLD 🍿
🚨 NEW: Over 500 police officers have today raided the Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light site in Crewe
Several people have been arrested on suspicion of rape, modern slavery and forced marriage
[@billcurtis0]
STOP DISHONOURING EACH OTHER!
Muslims will debate theology for centuries.
Free will vs. divine decree. The attributes of Allah.
Profound disagreement. Tolerated. And in some cases, celebrated as scholarly rigor.
But dare to read a geopolitical situation differently, and suddenly you are a traitor.
The name calling crosses sacred redlines: The honour of a believer.
There is ikhtilaf (valid differences) in matters of eternal consequence.
And there is supposedly no room for it in probabilistic political judgments made on:
Incomplete data, fragmented narratives, and competing claims.
Someone explain the logic.
Because theology concerns ultimate reality.
Politics, in most cases, concerns contingent assessment.
Limited information. Many variables.
Sincere people, valid reasoning, different conclusions.
If difference is legitimate in the more foundational domain, how does it become betrayal in the more uncertain one?
What this usually reveals is not principled Islamic epistemology.
It is ego dressed as conviction. Partisanship performing as certainty.
The inability to distinguish between holding a position firmly and treating all other positions as kufr-adjacent.
Yes, theology shapes politics. Creed informs how we read the world. Acknowledged fully.
But there is still a distinction between foundational theological truth and probabilistic political judgment made under conditions of uncertainty.
Collapsing that distinction is not strength.
It is an epistemological error.
The inconsistency is telling.
Ikhtilaf in aqidah: scholarly tradition.
Ikhtilaf in geopolitics: betrayal of the ummah.
That asymmetry deserves serious reflection. Because what drives it is rarely love of truth.
P.s. For those with poor comprehension skills, this obviously cannot be applied to Israel’s and Zionism’s evil. I thought I’d mention this just in case.
أن يدخل الليل عندهم، ويحتمل لزومها لوقت واحد وإن كان نهارًا بالنسبة لقوم وليلًا بالنسبة لآخرين، والظاهر الأول - أي تكون عند كل قوم حسب ليلتهم - لينطبق عليه مسمى الليل عند كل منهما أخذًا مما قيل في ساعة الإجابة في يوم الجمعة إنها تختلف باختلاف أوقات الخطب"
(فائدة في إدراك ليلة القدر عند اختلاف المطالع، وكذا في ساعة الإجابة يوم الجمعة عند اختلاف البلاد في الأوقات)
قال العلامة الشبراملسي في حاشيته على نهاية المحتاج:
"ثم يحتمل أنها تكون عند كل قوم بحسب ليلهم، فإذا كانت ليلة القدر عندنا نهارًا لغيرنا تأخرت الإجابة والثواب إلى