I audit your 0DTE/1DTE fills on SPX/SPY/QQQ — where you have edge, where you don't, and where your execution leaks money. Not signals. First 10 audits free →
A trader sent me their last 251 0DTE fills. Green on the year — but they couldn't tell me where the edge actually lived. The audit could. The edge is real. They're handing most of it back, and not from where they'd ever look. The teardown ↓
@salmaogs i remember when options flow was "the hot thing" in 2022, even tried it myself. Now its become pretty understood as a hedging mechanism for large firms which was always its intention since the beginning. Large to me means that.. but unusual trades sometimes milk from time to time
@shentrades Every trade should be opened exactly like this.. ToS has the capability to have s/t as well as a runner target on half the position which is pretty nice
@unusual_whales morale craters in these because "pivot to AI" usually means reorging people around a tool instead of a problem. when it's org-first instead of product-first, the best engineers feel it first and leave first. the dissatisfaction is the signal
@MarioNawfal the market already voted, oil round-tripped to pre-war levels and rate-hike odds barely moved. the lasting damage from these conflicts is never the oil spike.. it's the risk premium that stays in the curve long after the headlines fade, that's literally the part nobody prices.
@unusual_whales the headline is the resignation, the tell is the reaction. watch gilts and the pound at monday's open.. a leadership change only matters to markets if it changes the fiscal path. if yields dont move, its continuity priced as drama.
@OddStats the date isnt the variable. 15 samples of one calendar day is noise.. what repeats isnt June 22, its the regime. the ±1%-day company you listed (2000, 2008, 2020, 2022) says volatility cluster, not seasonal tailwind. the tell is the vol, not the date.
@Jake__Wujastyk clean structure. the part that decides it isn't the shoulders, its the neckline... volume needs to dry up into the right shoulder and expand on the break, or these fail more than they work. on TSLA especially i'd treat it as a level to react to, not a thesis to front-run.
@asklivermore the trend's right but the names carry some pretty old baggage. SWKS and QRVO still live and die on the iPhone unit cycle, not datacenter AI. the low-latency buildout you're describing accrues to optical and interconnect, not legacy RF front-ends
@TraderAryan a 100% win rate over a week is usually less about being right and more about how trades get booked.. winners cut quick, red ones held til they come back. clean record, but it hides the heat each one took. avg win vs avg loss is the number that actually compounds.
@charliebilello depends whether AI is showing up in the numbers or just the multiple. seats and revenue intact, only the multiple compressed is an opportunity. AI eating the actual revenue is a trap. the market's pricing all of it as a trap right now, which is exactly when the two separate.
@charliebilello the same theme is picking both ends. 19 of the 20 best are AI, and 13 of the 20 worst are software getting disrupted by it. thats not a broad mania.. its the market using AI to sort winners from losers inside one sector. dispersion, not euphoria.
@EliteOptions2 the part people skip is the order. the exponential only works if you size up after the numbers prove out, not before. backwards, and the same multiplier compounds the drawdowns. patience isnt being slow — its waiting for the edge to be real before you scale it.
@edgeful the number that matters isnt 80%, its 80% vs the unconditional. ES closes green more often than not, so green→green is a modest tilt. the 74% red→red is the sharper read. down closes are rarer, so thats the bigger lift over baseline.