๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ซ๐จ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ | Driving Business Success Through Impactful Communication Strategies | Mentor |
To all the married people here, what beneficial advise would you like to give someone who is about it get married?
(from what you've learnt by experience)
A 1st-year med student asked me today: "Sir, if we feel extremely hungry but skip the meal, why does the hunger completely disappear after some time? Shouldn't it just keep getting worse?"
I am surprised most students don't know the actual endocrinology behind this.
THE EBOLA AGENDA:
In 2014, in Guinea, there was a mineral scandal.
This scandal was known as the "Simandou mining rights corruption scandal," described as one of the largest resource heists in history.
Simandou is a 110-km mountain range in southern Guinea bordering Liberia, and it is Africa's biggest mining project.
The Simandou scandal reached its climax in April 2014, when the Guinean government revoked the multi-billion-dollar mining licenses held by Beny Steinmetz Group Resources (BSGR) and its partner, Vale, after an investigation found they had been acquired through corruption.
Around this time in Liberia, in the diamond-rich Fuamah District of Bong County, an 18-carat diamond was stolen and sold on the black market for a paltry USD 20,000, far below its true international market value.
This prompted the Government of Liberia to crack down on these thieves. The suspects were taken into police custody. The government stepped in to settle territorial and security disputes in the area.
However, around this period, something strange came up, a new disease whose name was not known at the time. An outbreak of haemorrhagic disease was noted in which symptoms manifested by anal and nasal bleeding.
This was later concluded as Ebola, which peaked in September of that year.
The diamond heist and the Simandou scandal disappeared amidst this "outbreak."
The revocation of BSGR license and the theft of diamond carats led to the manufacture of man-made epidemics by arsenic poisoning of the people (https://t.co/Koloj5R1w0)
This is exactly how Afrikan resources are looted. The looters fund civil wars or manufacture epidemics, they create terror, fear and intimidation, then, in that confusion, loot our resources while pretending to care for our health.
Since we agree that Ebola has existed, but its existence from 1976 up to the year 2004 was attributed to the index patients handling or eating carcasses of chimpanzees and wild animals (https://t.co/6ibqDGQzVZ)
However, what is happening today about Ebola is a PsyOp.
The Ebola agenda is a deliberate plan to disrupt the mineral resources economy in Africa.
It is the theft of our resources, hiding behind disaster mitigation.(https://t.co/kx2PtX4nB8)
Prove me wrong!
ARE you Permanent and Pensionable? If you are unlawfully dismissed before your retirement age, should you be paid anticipatory salary and allowances for the years you would have served.
On the eve of Jamhuri Day last year (11th December 2025) the Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgement that you should read. It was the climax of a labour case that had been in the corridors of the judiciary since 1992.
The case was filed by three former employees of Telkom Kenya (formerly Kenya Posts and Telecommunications Corporation) Francis Waithaka Ngokonyo, Sudi Abdalla and Andrew Muga who were retrenched in 1991.
Francis was employed as a pupil engineer on June 10, 1973 rising to become Assistant General Manager (Data Processing). Sudi was employed on October 5, 1971 as an Assistant Telecommunications Controller, Grade II and rose to become Area ManagerโNairobi South. Andrew was employed on April 17, 1961 as a Clerical Officer Grade II and rose to become Senior Assistant Manager (Telephone Accounts)
On July 19, 1991, they were placed on compulsory leave on grounds of persistent laxity, the particulars of which were not disclosed. Their efforts to seek audience with the the management failed.
On October 22, 1991, they were formally retired in public interest. Francis was 41, Sudi 43 and Andrew 50. They were paid gratuity and cumulative pension payments.They filed three separate cases against Telkom Kenya challenging the retrenchment and the cases were then consolidated.
They argued that retirement before age of fifty-five (55), amounted to wrongful termination. They therefore sought general and special damages, as well as pension and other benefits.
On April 11, 2001 High Court judge Hayanga, awarded Francis Ksh15.7million, Sudi Ksh10.5million and Andrew Ksh2.7million.
Unfortunately, the judgement was read by a Deputy Registrar on behalf of the judge, which is contrary to the rules.
On July 2, 2004, the Court of Appeal nullified the judgement on that technicality and sent the case back to the High Court for fresh hearing. It went before judge Havelock.
On December 20, 2013 Havelock, J) awarded Francis Ksh14,965,568, Sudi Ksh12,783,404, and Andrew Ksh1,874,676.30.
Telkom filed an appeal at the Court of Appeal in 2017. The three employees also filed a cross-appeal over the reduction of the initial awards.
The main grounds of appeal were that the High Court judge had erred by awarding the three former employees the loss of anticipated salaries and allowances until their projected retirement age.
That the judge had failed to appreciate that anticipatory salaries and allowances are too speculative and it is not a fair and reasonable remedy.
That the judge failed to appreciate that the retrenched employees were expected to mitigate their losses by securing alternative employment and that an award of anticipatory salaries and allowance amounts to an unjust enrichment.
That the judge had failed to consider that employment remedies are not aimed at facilitating the unjust enrichment of aggrieved employees but rather are meant to redress economic injuries in a proportionate way.
That he had failed to appreciate that allowances are enjoyed by those in actual employment and not by those who have ceased to be employees.
On July 26, 2024, three Court of Appeal judges (Nyamweya, Mativo & Gachoka) held on among other issues that anticipatory salaries and allowances were speculative and amounted to unjust enrichment, as there was no guarantee of service until retirement.
The three employees appealed to the Supreme Court in February 2025. They raised a substantial issue regarding anticipatory salaries and allowances in circumstances where employees in the public sector are asked to retire early from employment in the public interest, or for the common good of the government. The issue was canvassed in great length.
On December 11, 2025 the Supreme Court delivered the judgement that sealed the debate.
1/2
The High Court yesterday made a very important decision. When you take a loan from any lending institution, the amount of interest accrued cannot exceed the amount you received from the institution (principal). Meaning if you borrow kshs. 100,000, you cannot pay more than kshs.200,000 in total. This is good news to many Kenyans. Tag that one lending institution wajionee habari kamili.
Major cheat code for life: Learn to delay your reaction. Anger, fear, and impulse will try to make you move fast. There's power in pausing. In the pause, you see clearly, you respond wisely, and you avoid decisions youโll regret. Slow down to speed up.
@pitandirangu One what if one can't account for the expenses incurred? You have spent but no receipts. Expenses like transport, shopping, sending money home, etc.
Second. Some universities don't remit. They have deducted the tax percentage but none asked for your KRA pin.
What happens here?