Restore Britain is abundantly clear about what we stand for on immigration. THIS is our position. I urge you to read, and share if you agree.
Every illegal migrant will be deported. No questions asked. The boats will stop. Our 100+ page policy plan is produced and ready to go. It can be done. My position is well understood on this.
Legal migrants will be expected to work, contribute, speak our language and respect our way of life. If they don't do that, they'll be asked to leave.
If they hate us, and wish to do us harm - they will leave.
We support net negative immigration. Taking ultra-skilled migrants who will give far more than they take in small and manageable numbers, but shutting off entire visa routes from countries that are proven to supply us with miscreants and takers. The Red List.
Those foreign individuals who are here, who work hard, who contribute to society will absolutely be welcome.
But we will not allow millions of foreigners, mainly from the third world, to take the piss.
If a foreign national is unable to support themselves financially, it is not our problem. They should leave. We should not pay for their benefits, their social housing, their NHS care.
Again - it is not our problem.
They will go home. Millions will go.
Firm, but fair.
Dual nationals who want to blow us up will have their British citizenship stripped, and deported. If they rape young girls, they will have their citizenship stripped, and deported.
The spouse visa system will be eased, to allow citizens of non-red list countries to join their British partners.
There are underhand attempts to misrepresent our position. Ignore it. Send them this post.
We speak for ourselves, and only ourselves.
This is not controversial. This is certainly not 'neo-nazi' as Reform claim.
This is the position of the vast majority of the British people, and they finally have a political party representing that view now.
Restore Britain.
Iโm a terrorist suspect for anti-Islam social media posts. According to the British government.
As soon as I landed in Heathrow airport, I was detained under schedule 7 Terrorism Act 2000, then was forced to hand over 2 phones and my laptop/ external hard drives.
I was meticulously searched and was made to hand over all my passwords, facial recognition to my phones and fingerprints. They now have complete access to my entire life. All because of social media posts about the truth of Islam - which is simply that itโs a religion that worships a paedophile prophet Muhammad that states in their Hadith 5134 he married a 6 year old Ayesha and slept with her at 9 years old.
For speaking the truth, the Keir Starmerโs government clamps down on free speech on its own people.
Iโm a classical cellist and uplifting euphoric trance producer thatโs never had a criminal record, and just a normal happy go lucky, hung like a chipmunk Korean whoโs feeling lucky about growing up in Scotland.
Funny what they class as a terrorist suspect these days.
๐จ URGENT
Two days ago I was contacted by a high-ranking employee of the French Government. After determining this personโs position and proximity to the French couple, I have deemed the information they gave me to be credible enough to share publicly in the event that something happens.
In short, this person claims that the Macrons have executed upon and paid for my assassination. Yes, you read that correctly. More specifically, that the green light was given to a small team in National Gendamarie Intervention Group. I am told there is one Israeli that is on this assasination squad and the plans were formalized.
Again, this person provided concrete proof that they are well placed within the French government apparatus.
Further to this point, this person claims that Charlie Kirkโs assassin trained with the French legion 13th brigade with multi-state involvement.
Journalist Xavier Poussardโs life is also at risk. This is deadly serious. The head of state of France apparently wants us both dead and has authorized professional units to carry this out.
I ask that every person RETWEET and share this.
I do not know who in the American government can be trusted, since this source claims our leaders are aware. But I have more specific information which is definitively verifiable, should they care to reach out to me.
To the brave official in France who did this because they were so moved by the evil of Charlieโs public execution to risk their own lifeโ May God bless you. Truly.
Let all be revealed.
So, just so I get this right. We pay tax, it vanishes to control inflation. Then the government/bank just make more then do their government spending. I feel enlightened.
It does happen.
Saying it's incredibly difficult to apply for PIP, is just dramatic. I'll settle for not easy.
@squall_loire@PositivFuturist Right, so just so I get this right. We pay tax, it vanishes the control inflation. Then all the government spending money comes from?
Well, lucky you. It does happen.
There are extremely difficult things in life. Applying for PIP, isn't one of them.
"Even if taxes paid for government spending". What does taxes go towards then?
Do you even drive a car? Or drive it 500 miles a year? Tyres can wear, get bulges in them, or a complete blowout. It does happen. In terms of brakes, depends on mileage/driving style. It does happen.
I already explained why I'm not against motability.
Four million people have managed to access it? Is it really "incredibly difficult"? Not easy mabye.
Actually, you're right. Nothing is free. Someone, somewhere pays for it.
Brand new car, insurance up to three people, breakdown cover, servicing, maintenance, road tax, adaptations where required. All covered.
Motability pays for this. PIP pays motability. DWP pay PIP. GOV pays DWP. Taxpayers pay the GOV.
Buying a brand new car outwith motability, the buyer will have to pay all of this themselves. Not to mention the massive depreciation of cars they'll have to accept aswell. All out of their own pocket.
Sure, some people pay a bit extra to get an upgrade on what car they get. But overall, they'll still be getting a brand new car for a massive reduction when everything is factored in.
For the record, generally manufacturers recommended that a vehicle gets serviced annually or at a certain mileage. Whichever comes first.
There's also a reason why I said wear and tear items. Any manufacturing defects will be covered under warranty. But wear and tear items wearing and tearing does happen.
Also for the record, I'm not against the motability scheme. People who need it should get what they need. I just think it's grown arms and legs to the point where most taxpayers who can't afford a new car, are subsidising nice or really nice new cars for other people beyond what they need.