@Yahya562924 Pardon me, i understood the expression "my father's god" as "my father is god" and thought it is some sort of Ḥallājī metaphor, may Allāh's curse be upon him. Your statement is correct and beautiful.
@Yahya562924 Astaghfirullāh, how can you say that Allāh is your father? Repent to Allāh, for even metaphorically this is a grave and terrible statement.
@Yahya562924 Do not quote such tweets with imagery of ʿĪsā, ʿalayhi as-salām, as this is the reason why it appeared on my fyp and probably on other brothers' as well. It is the reason for the spread of evil.
Best treatise regarding the Judgement of Takfīr in Sharīʿah?
I got You.
at-Tibyān aṣ-Ṣarīḥ is a detailed clarification on Takfīr, which presents the path of the Imāms of ʿIlm, and the adherents of the Sunnah regarding the issue. Benefit and share.
https://t.co/7rIddHmcb6
Imām Ḥarb al-Kirmānī raḥimahullāh likewise said when he talked about the characteristics of the Khawārij:
“They do not believe that the ruler has the right to their obedience, nor that the Quraysh have (the sole right to) the Khilāfah.”
[Kitāb as-Sunnah No. 101]
Assalāmu ʿAlaykum wa Raḥmatullāhi wa Barakātuh, this is my new Telegram channel:
https://t.co/h5wcPI7ips
It will include texts about ʿAqīdah and Tawḥīd but also refutations of Shubuhāt, so spread it in shāʾ Allāh.
Take the religion seriously and do not label Mushrikīn as Muslims and do not make Takfīr upon Muslimīn.
Declaring someone to be a Muslim is a part of al-Walāʾ and Takfīr is a part of al-Barāʾ. So do not be neglectful in your Tawḥīd.
Your brother,
al-Muʿtamid ʿalā Allāh
The Aʾimmah an-Najdiyyah raḥimahumullāh said:
فإن الذي لا يكفر المشركين، غير مصدق بالقرآن
“Whoever does not make Takfīr upon the Mushrikīn has disbelieved in the Qurʾān.”
[ad-Durar as-Saniyyah 9/291]
Imām Ibn Abī Dāwūd raḥimahullāh wrote in a beautiful poem:
“And don‘t be a Murjiʾ who plays with his religion - Indeed, the Murjiʾ jokes with his religion.”
[al-Ḥā ʾiyyah No. 35]
It is noteworthy that ʿAlī radīy-allāhu ʿanhu talked about a matter of Fiqh while these people extend this and use logical arguments when it comes to ʿAqīdah and Tawḥīd.
So beware of those who have no predecessor in what they state.
Your brother,
al-Muʿtamid ʿalā Allāh
Imām Aḥmad raḥimahullāh said to one of his students:
يا أبا الحسن، إياك أن تتكلم في مسألة ليس لك فيها إمام.
“Yā Abā l-Ḥasan, woe to you that you are talking about a matter in which you have no Imām (predecessor).”
[Manāqib al-Imām Aḥmad 1/245]
ʿAlī radīy-allāhu ʿanhu said:
“If the religion were based upon one’s opinion, one might expect the bottom of the leather sock to be wiped instead of the top. I have seen the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ wiping over the upper part of his leather socks.”
[Sunan Abī Dāwūd 162]
@abu_luan@ibnrizo I don‘t think anyone falls into Ghulūʾ by reading the books of the Salaf. Everybody should read them as they teach us the correct understanding and approach.
Allāh taʿālā sits on His throne as affirmed by the Prophet sallā-llāhu ʿalayhi wa sallama, the Saḥābah and the Salaf altogether.
There is no doubt about this and whoever rejects this has indeed followed the path of Jahm ibn Safwān.
The truth has been mixed with falsehood everywhere, so glad tidings to the one whom Allāh has guided to the light of Tawḥīd and Īmān.
You are indeed like a beacon of light in the darkest of nights. May Allāh have mercy upon you and make you steadfast.
Your brother,
al-Muʿtamid
ʿAbdullāh ibn Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal has an own chapter in his Kitāb as-Sunnah about the attribute of Sitting in which he mentions the narrations of the Salaf.
How come that those who claim to follow the Salaf are ignorant of the books of the Salaf?