I roulette er princippet enkelt: Man placerer sin indsats, kuglen sættes i bevægelse, og så håber man, at den lander det rigtige sted.
Min tidligere kollega @SofieRud har i denne uge valgt en mere avanceret variant, hvor hun spiller rudsisk roulette med troværdigheden som indsats.
Lad mig begynde med det personlige, fordi det ikke er uvæsentligt i denne sammenhæng:
Jeg har intet dårligt at sige om Sofie Rud som menneske. Vi har gennem flere år siddet sammen i studiet som paneldeltagere i TV 2 News-magasinet ”Kampen om USA”.
Det har været både fornøjeligt og behageligt, men det handler ikke om det personlige. Men om det principielle. Og principper bliver først for alvor interessante, når man ser, om de også gælder mennesker, man kender og godt kan lide.
Hvis man vælger at arbejde som politisk rådgiver for den amerikanske ambassade, vælger man at legitimere en administration, der aktivt arbejder på at destabilisere Kongeriget Danmark. Mere kompliceret er det sådan set ikke.
Sofie arbejder nu for den diplomatiske repræsentation for en nation og administration, der har truet Danmark økonomisk, udfordret rigsfællesskabets territoriale integritet og nægtet at respektere grønlændernes gentagne nej til at blive amerikanere. Derfor er kritikken både forudsigelig og legitim.
Samtidig viser et hurtigt blik på LinkedIn og de øvrige sociale medier, at medie- og konsulentbranchen har en noget anden tilgang til den slags jobskifter end den gennemsnitlige dansker.
På LinkedIn er der en klar overvægt af hjertelige lykønskninger og rygklapperi fra folk i mediebranchen, mens kommentarsporene på andre sociale medier er overvejende negative.
Også det fortæller os noget om afstanden mellem den fjerde statsmagt og det samfund, som mediebranchen er sat i verden for at beskrive.
Man forstår det jo godt. For mange almindelige danskere er det intuitivt mærkeligt, at en journalist og kommentator, som konsekvent har kritiseret Trump-administrationens udenrigspolitiske ageren, vælger at skifte side og træde ind i det diplomatiske apparat, der skal fremme samme administrations interesser.
Sådan ser man tilsyneladende ikke på tingene i mediebranchen. Her betragtes den slags jobskifter efterhånden som en helt naturlig karriereudvikling.
Journalister bliver særlige rådgivere og pressechefer, hvorefter de vender tilbage som redaktionschefer, værter eller kommentatorer. Det samme gælder tidligere politikere, som bevæger sig den modsatte vej.
Skåret ind til benet er vi vidne til en amerikanisering af den danske mediebranche, hvor svingdøren mellem journalistik, politik og diplomati snurrer stadig hurtigere.
Det korte af det lange er, at Sofie har truffet et karrierevalg, som det selvfølgelig står hende frit for at træffe. Offentligheden er lige så meget i sin gode ret til at vurdere, om jobskiftet falder i god jord eller skader hendes renommé.
Det er trods alt den indsats, man lægger på bordet, når man beslutter sig for at spille rudsisk roulette med troværdigheden.
I spoke with the Prime Minister of Norway. Thank you, @jonasgahrstore, for your unwavering support and readiness to work together. I briefed the Prime Minister on how things went in Washington. We had good meetings, and there has been diplomatic progress. We are very much counting on practical results, and protection against ballistic missiles is the first priority and an everyday need. Patriot missiles and our joint production efforts are what save people’s lives. It is important that we achieve this anti-ballistic progress with America.
We also discussed opportunities for pushing Russia toward diplomacy. And we addressed the risks – first and foremost, what could happen this winter. I am grateful to Norway for its readiness to support our energy resilience and strengthen Ukraine ahead of this winter. We also agreed on a meeting schedule. Thank you!
This morning, I asked President Trump if he’s okay with the Iranians charging a toll for all ships that go through the Strait of Hormuz, he told me there may be a Joint US-Iran venture to charge tolls:
“We’re thinking of doing it as a joint venture. It’s a way of securing it — also securing it from lots of other people.”
“It’s a beautiful thing”
He’s wrong about everything, and thinks he’s right about everything. Hard to tell which is worse.
The war will end when Russia decides no longer to fight. The US could make that happen with a few simple policies. Instead the Trump administration offers ridiculous analysis and pathetic excuses.
Once Ukraine got deep strike drones and missiles.
There simply isn't enough air defense equipment in the whole world to protect Russian rail, oil and gas infrastructure.
Trump 45’ had Fiona Hill, an acknowledged expert on Putin (wrote the best book by far on him), as his Russia adviser. Trump 47’ has Witkoff as his Russia adviser, who knows nothing about RU, UKR, or Putin apart from seeing him as a nice, trustworthy guy.
Russia, one of the largest military powers in history, with active support from Iran and North Korea and the benevolent neutrality of China, has been unable to erase Ukraine from the world map for 12 years and now requires U.S. assistance to somehow choke it to death after three years of a failed full-scale war.
Zbigniew Brzezinski would have gone mad seeing this.
@elonmusk Or maybe Elon is pissed that the people of Norway, one of the biggest markets for EV's, are dropping Tesla faster than watered down diarrhea?
@elonmusk Poor, poor Norway with their social mobility, lack of corruption, happy population, low crime rate, universal healthcare. They are so so fucked. Maybe they want to be another US state? We can fix them by getting rid of all that socialist nonsense and giving em guns guns guns.
The drama in the Oval Office boiled down to this fundamental disconnect:
Trump: You need to agree to a ceasefire without any U.S. guarantees because you have no cards.
Zelensky: But what if it doesn’t hold?
Trump: I trust Putin, he will never cross me.
Zelensky: But he broke previous ceasefires, in 2015 and in 2022
JD Vance: You are insulting America. GTFO.
🙋♂️why would Ukraine need Trump and an onerous minerals deal if it is asked to surrender to Russia without any promise of protection?
Every president of both parties going back generations subscribed to the principle that a president doesn't pick the press corps that is allowed in the room to ask him questions. Trump has just declared that he will.
Having served as a Moscow correspondent in the early days of Putin's reign, this reminds me of how the Kremlin took over its own press pool and made sure that only compliant journalists were given access.
Other lies about Ukraine:
No, Zelensky hasn't banned "opposition parties". He has banned certain opposition parties because they are openly pro-Russian. Britain banned the British Union of Fascists during WW2 in exactly the same way. America went further and rounded up Japanese Americans and threw them into internment camps.
No, Zelensky hasn't suspended "independent media". He has suspended pro-Russian media. Even Orwell, arguably the greatest defender of free speech of the 20th century, acknowledged the need for state restrictions on media during war. The idea that in WW2 we would allow pro-enemy propaganda on our airwaves is absurd.
There are many legitimate criticisms to be made of the way this war came about, the way both the Ukrainian and Western leadership have behaved and the failure to end this war when it became clear that Ukraine had done its best and lost.
But the spectacle of people sitting in warmth, comfort and plenty lying and misrepresenting a country and a people who are courageously fighting to defend their land against a bully is sickening and people who engage in this should be deeply ashamed.
They won't, of course, because to most of them the war in Ukraine isn't a real thing. It's just a topic for online click farming. The only silver lining is we're really finding out who's who.
I'm an Ex-Muslim.
I know that many ex-Muslims & critics of Islam want to believe that the Christmas market terrorist in Germany is an undercover jihadist Muslim who pretended to be against Islam to harm non-Muslims.
It's more complicated than that. 🧵
#mohamad_Amin_Mahdavi has been sentenced to death for blasphemy and has now been moved to solitary confinement in preparation for execution. Please retweet and bring this case to attention of the world! We must try to stop his execution! @MaryamNamazie#محمدامین_مهدوی_شایسته