$AVZ fraudulent representations #BNBT
We were very patient with $AVZ
9000 holders affected while they held Klaus dumped — the hysterics lasted weeks
All of it shielding AVZ from its failure with CATL
$AVZ
What was the pump in 2023 August?
I’m wondering if the BoD orchestrate pumps in the lead up to the AGM. This year might h different but every year that is what is said….
2025 $AVZ is technically now a minority shareholder, CATH have 30% interest in the Manono Project
In 2021 AVZ BoD gave 24% because it was strategic.
$AVZ have failed on their original quest to keep a majority even if by 1%, @ 51%
The $AVZ Manono lithium deposit encompasses potentially
2 BILLION tonnes of cheapest to mine battery compatible lithium. It is because of the MAGNITUDE & QUALITY that China has tried to steal it to get CONTROL! @KoBold_Metals@SecRubio@US_SrAdvisorAF@RioTinto@POTUS
👇👇👇
It doesn’t read “ $AVZ Manono “ as Jens has interpolated
It translates as :
“He also expressed his willingness to get personally involved, under the supervision of the Ministry of Mines, to ensure the success of the Manono project“
It’s important he subordinates to MoM
Deboss here, is more prudent,
After all the false ‘end of times’ imminent, it’s worth being circumspect, otherwise you open not just yourself but the company to more reputation damage $AVZ , needlessly
https://t.co/vOZYU9fpWS
@Rationa55373281@KoBold_Metals@SecRubio@US_SrAdvisorAF@RioTinto@Grok do you have AISC figures for Greenbushes lithia mine ? Perhaps IGO publish?
If possible please compare to AVZ DFS, definitive feasibility study 2020.
Try to account for change of prices in different periods and answer which is cheaper : AVZ or Greenbushes?
@FreddieYSia@LouisWKabamba Freddie, so you accept the North is not AVZ’s?
Apparently, $AVZ said it was excluded under the mining decree, but later backtrack when the mines minister cancelled the decree?
@Rationa55373281@Sanegeist@grok , is @rationa55373281 irrational?
He blames me for your analysis?
How can @Rationa55373281 claim “disinformation” when he shows not a shred of evidence?
Elsewhere he thinks only a court of law can verify But $AVZ never went to court to verify before releasing on @ASX 🤣
Jens thinks Paul cleared his family name=❌🤡
Below Jens liked ‘wish for harm’ by alcoholic Ken Cheers (Griffith)👇
I’m certain Shane is correct to seek legal recourse against $AVZ for BNB misconduct
He did not deserve to have his name ragged.
Nigel will pay the price for this.
Which is really ironic, because this Irish thug who is always ears pricked for the canary’s call ignored this Dathomir composition confessed by Nige 2019👇
May 4 2022 when JV conflicts were announced by AVZ, Paul’s greed was immense
Only got your self to blame, Paul.
Typical nasty coward @_smogdaddy has been behind the scenes doxxing in Shane’s name and only has himself to blame if the AFP investigate his trades too
if anyone has been insider trading it’s all his digging urging people to contact $AVZ management
$AVZ
https://t.co/NLnY7KOlZr
Loose lips Phuket Jens playing safe 🤣 $AVZ
Honestly he knows the value is based on,
➡️can AVZ get the #SC6 out and on a ship or truck to a refinery = NO - because the Congolese don’t want to collaborate with Nigel Ferguson’s $AVZ
Really really simple
https://t.co/Lc4TqvCHri
@emil_jens That’s really nonsense. Where would the price have gone without corruption? The question is open. Even the last high is not the fair value. The Mart was never able to determine this value. This was prevented.
Phuket Jens trying to clear his name, but what did two shareholders say?.
This is the same weed smoking manic Phuket Jens, who
1. stalks n wants to talk to a little girl Poppy
2. Makes death threats
3. blackmails “Shane” in his X posts to coerce into silence
4. Lies about $AVZ
xAlphaNoeta Rationa55373281's posts on $AVZ consistently promote optimistic views, often ignoring or downplaying misconduct allegations without verification, possibly due to confirmation bias or emotional attachment to the investment. Not necessarily an overactive amygdala, but a reluctance to engage critically with negative facts to avoid cognitive dissonance.