History of football, stadiums, materiality, spaces & everyday urban life. Postwar Britain and USSR. Previously @OfficialUoM @becketthistory & Ex-Петербуржец.
🔴 Heritage Alert 🔴
ICOMOS, together with its International Scientific Committee on 20th Century Heritage (ISC20C) is issuing a worldwide Heritage Alert to amplify awareness of the threat to the #stadionulrepublican in Chișinău, Republic of Moldova.
❗ICOMOS is urging stronger legal protections for the site and its individual elements due to their significance as a rare surviving example of socialist realist sports architecture in Eastern Europe. The site’s preservation is critical for national memory and international scholarship.
Help us amplify the call to save Chișinău’s Republican Stadium: https://t.co/irjMu9OLHu
#HeritageAlert #socialistarchitecture
@sandumaiamd@AlexMunteanuMD
@ClarkeMicah Fair enough and thanks for replying. Though to be clear I did not intend to attack anyone, merely curious as to how often “poor quality” counsel occurs on both sides of the same trial in general? I don’t follow legal trials so wouldn’t have any clue myself. I’d assume unusual?!
@ClarkeMicah Peter apologies in advance for the long message… I’m fascinated by the prospect that both the defence and prosecution, in the same very serious trial, seem to have been of very poor quality (if we are to believe that LL’s defence was poor on the premise that they f
failed to rebutt so many accusations that were so fallible, then we must also accept the prosecution was of similarly poor quality, no)? As someone who’s no idea of these things, how usual is it to have really bad prosecution and defences, in the same very serious criminal trial?
Just to let you know about a very exciting project I'm embarking on in the Rhondda Valley. It's early days, but the more help I can get to finance, set up and operate this venture right, the better.. 💓https://t.co/4kUfOHuK5G