Sara Duterte’s counsel, Atty. Sison, actively tries to fool the viewers by treating a constitutional trial like a reality TV popularity contest.
She kept mentioning the 32 million votes the useless VP got in 2022 and even compared it to PBBM’s.
This is a classic, desperate “argumentum ad populum” fallacy.
Sison deeply insults the public's intelligence by gaslighting us into believing the impeachment process will negate the election.
Sison wants the people to believe 32 million votes means absolute immunity for the useless VP.
Girl, ang baba naman ng tingin mo sa mga Pilipino.
With your logic, you're making Filipinos look dumb and you’re giving the DDS arguments that make them stupid beyond repair.
Kay ang tatanga ng reasoning ng mga DDS, it’s because of people like you!
@Teekonning@PatsKam The word is **overmorrow** — an archaic English term for the day after tomorrow.
Its counterpart for the day before yesterday is **ereyesterday**. Both are rarely used today, which is why most people don't know them.
What kind of religion demands that its followers skip the jobs that feed their families, endure rallies in pouring rain, and sleep on sidewalks — all to defend a single man accused of plunder?
Answer: A cult!
Ang sakin lang, the DDS lost their right to lecture us about law and order the moment they cheered for Duterte to kill people without trial. It's hard to take their outrage about crime seriously. At hindi pa din nila magets kung bakit salot sila.
Wag kayo magpapaniwala dyan kay Pulong. Wala pang ICC warrant na lumabas para kanino man. Kung may lalabas man later on, siguradong di nya malalaman yan gaya nung di nalaman ng tatay nya na may warrant na sya.