@I_Am_Weapon_X@theScore Exactly my point you fucking moron. You wouldn’t cause you’d get your shit clocked sideways. Always some stupid dumb fucks that think there tough
@GregHar78818028@Full_Violence@Shara_Bullet77 No you illiterate fucking moron, he’s showing that he struggled and obviously grew out of it. Stay mad your favorite boyfriend is getting clapped by a dagi dumbass
@akafaceUS Why make this about religion “Mohammad from Egypt”. This isn’t about anyone’s religion or nationality, harassment is wrong period. Average white man in America statically is either pedophile or rapist. But I promise you, your lame ass wouldn’t blame them for it. Such weirdos lmao
@NeoTheShaman@WajeehMirza7@TheNotoriousMMA Fucking stupid ass fake ass Christian. You don’t know religion you’re just some fat moron sitting on his couch losing a debate. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
That’s a child’s argument. Paying taxes is a legal obligation, not a moral endorsement — if taxes meant approval, then every citizen supports every war, every prison, every injustice their government has ever committed. Muslims living under a contract aren’t “sponsoring bombs,” they’re obeying the law while actively condemning oppression, just like millions of Americans who protest wars their taxes still fund. You’re not defending Muslims you’re abusing dead civilians as a debate prop because you can’t separate responsibility from coercion. That’s not moral clarity; that’s ignorance pretending to be righteousness.
You’re confusing living somewhere with endorsing everything it does, which is a childish mistake. Paying taxes under citizenship isn’t approval of foreign policy any more than breathing air is approval of pollution. Talking about history isn’t bragging about wars, and faith isn’t measured by where you live or which passport you carry. You scream “hypocrisy” because you can’t separate theology from geopolitics for more than five seconds — that’s not righteousness, it’s intellectual panic. Keep shouting labels; it won’t fix the fact that your logic collapses every time it’s examined.
You’re recycling a modern moral framework and pretending it applied 1,400 years ago — that’s not an argument, it’s an anachronism. Aisha herself never claimed abuse, described her marriage as loving, and became one of the most influential scholars in Islam. In the 7th century, post-puberty marriage was the norm across Arabia, Byzantium, Persia, and even medieval Christianity judging it by 21st-century standards is historically illiterate. If this were “rape,” you’d have contemporaries condemning it; instead, you have silence from enemies and praise from the woman herself. Calling it predation doesn’t make it so it just proves you don’t understand history, consent in context, or how evidence works.
You still don’t know the difference between description and worship, and that’s why you’re lost. The hadith you keep waving does not say sins are forgiven by the stone, transferred into it, or that it’s divine that belief literally does not exist in Sunni creed. That’s why Umar ibn al-Khattab openly said the stone has no power to benefit or harm. Calling someone “kafir” because they reject an object having power only proves you don’t understand Islam, hadith, or basic logic. Insults and shock phrases don’t turn a misunderstanding into an argument they just expose that you’ve got nothing left but noise.
Aye bro go argue with your local priest that touched kids for living. Yikes weirdo you lost this one kid.
You’re just throwing buzzwords because you’re out of arguments. Living in the US isn’t hypocrisy paying taxes doesn’t mean endorsing every war, just like living on Earth doesn’t mean you support everything humans do. Discussing history isn’t bragging, and faith isn’t measured by empires or GDP charts. You keep confusing theology with geopolitics because that’s the only way your logic survives for five seconds. Laugh all you want every reply you post just proves you don’t understand religion, history, or consistency.
Like you’ve been losing to every argument lik a moron lmao. Did the priest touch you or something that’s why you’re so agitated? Lmao go sprinkle yourself in holy water kid maybe it’ll “cleanse” your soul lmfao
@NeoTheShaman@WajeehMirza7@TheNotoriousMMA Again I’m arguing with a stubborn low IQ moron, that can’t comprehend basic history. I know you some bum ass weirdo lmao. Little ass kid having meltdown cause his religion is corrupted lmfao
paganism even is, yet you keep using the word like a club.
Paganism isn’t “doing something that existed before.”
Paganism is worshipping objects as divine or believing they have independent power.
Islam explicitly denies that the Black Stone has power.
The Prophet explicitly denied it.
ʿUmar explicitly denied it.
That alone disqualifies your entire argument.
Also, claiming “Allah never told him to do it” just exposes that you don’t know Islamic theology. In Islam, the Prophet’s actions and approvals are part of the religion. That’s literally what Sunnah is. If you don’t accept that framework, fine but pretending it’s a contradiction just shows you’re arguing from outside a system you refuse to understand.
And the “logic is haram” line? That’s just projection.
Islam built entire disciplines of logic, law, philosophy, and linguistics while Europe was burning people for heresy. You’re benefiting from that legacy while mocking it — peak irony.