matt reding

I love God, My Beautiful Wife, my two baby girls and I Bleed Maize & Blue. My kids have been able to sing the victors from age 2

[matt reding @aMAIZEingBLUE]

@ECNLgirls More lightning all day tomorrow. Move all friday games to Saturday then squeeze in the noon and 2pm games from today tomorrow. Then Noone gets the advantage of a rest day saturday. Evens the playing field and makes more sense with the forcast for friday...

[matt reding @aMAIZEingBLUE]

@ECNLgirls The forcast looks worse tomorrow...the fair thing to do is move all friday games to saturday and then fitting the noon and 2pm games from today. Then no one gets the advantage of rest on saturday

[matt reding @aMAIZEingBLUE]

@ECNLgirls Updates?

[matt reding @aMAIZEingBLUE]

@ECNLgirls updates please

[matt reding @aMAIZEingBLUE]

@DawnDavenportTN 1st of the month bone thugs, mom nope Hansen. Down with the king. Run DMC

[matt reding @aMAIZEingBLUE]

@JJCarafano Tatooine IFYKYK

[Big Ten information and news @Genetics56]

Reasons Why the Big Ten and SEC Are Naturally Drifting Apart

College athletics isn't moving towards a Power 2 structure, it is moving towards a Power 1 structure.

While the SEC and Big Ten have similar motivations -they are drifting apart due natural evolution.

Divergent Growth Strategies and Core Identities (Parallel Paths Toward Revenue/Super-Conference Goals but in Opposite Directions)

Geographic Footprint and National vs. Regional Reach

Big Ten: Aggressive coast-to-coast expansion has created a true nationwide brand spanning East Coast, Midwest, Pacific Northwest, and Los Angeles. They own 12 of the top 25 media markets. The only thing missing, outside of a presence inside Texas, is along I-95 (basically the southeast.

SEC: Expansion of Texas, Oklahoma kept the conference mainly regional. Their identity is rooted in compact Southern/Southeastern states. They did explore the idea of adding California and Stanford when USC and UCLA joined the Big Ten but they decided against. Thus, it was that moment when the Big Ten became the national conference the SEC stayed regional.

Academic and Institutional Priorities

Big Ten: Research-university model, 17 of 18 schools are AAU members; Big Ten Academic Alliance; Cancer Research Consitorium. They are akin to the Ivy League ethos.

SEC: Athletics-first focus (far fewer AAU members)

Brand Identity and Long-Term Focus

Big Ten: Diversified into a national powerhouse emphasizing multi-sport excellence, player development (portal/NIL), and coast-to-coast brand; resulting in a “Big Ten region” vs. “SEC region” irrelevant over time.

SEC: Football-first Southern identity; maximizes in-region talent and cultural

Media Strategy and Revenue Model

Big Ten: Diversified national exposure (Big Ten Network + Fox/CBS/NBC); higher per-school revenue projections from broader TV markets and NFL-style distribution.

SEC: Concentrated regional loyalty via SEC Network + ESPN partnership

Big Ten’s wealth (Fortune 500 companies, GDP $12.5T vs. SEC $8.4T; undergrad enrollment involves the Big Ten graduated hundreds of more students every year compared to the SEC. Far more living alumni in the Big Ten.

Philosophical and Governance Splits

I know for a fact that the SEC and Big Ten headquarters are not at war with eachother. I know this from some highly confidential sources. However, with that said, the conferences have their own views, their own goals, and their own desires and there are some things they just don't agree on and aren't going to come to agreement on.

When it comes to tampering, the Big Ten wants to allow for legal tampering. The SEC doesn't. The Big Ten wants to increase the revenue share cap. The SEC doesn't. The Big Ten schools use MMR to increase their revenue share/NIL pools. The SEC has some members that want to leave the NCAA and be with their own schools. The Big Ten, if they decide to go their own way will add some schools to bring with. The Big Ten wants to move forward with modern rules that are legal. The SEC wants to go back in time and try to cap income of athletes, cap the number of times an athlete can transfer. They want what worked for them back. This NIL era doesn't work for them like it does for the Big Ten.

The conferences pursue the same goals (revenue, blue-blood programs, super-conference power) but have chosen fundamentally different evolutionary paths:

Big Ten → national, academically aligned, diversified media/academic/athletic partnership; all-in on NIL

SEC → regional, athletics/football-first.

These structural differences - geography, academics, media, recruiting philosophy, governance vision are self-reinforcing and predate recent titles.

Championships amplify the narrative but are not the root cause of the drift; the drift was engineered by deliberate strategic choices and is now locked in by economics, demographics, and NIL-era rules.

The B1G and SEC are not the same, and the gap is structural, not cyclical.

Economic, demographic, and structural forces are accelerating the drift.

Financial Fracturing and Resource Disparities

Big Ten’s superior wealth raises the floor/ceiling; enables “what is your number” recruiting anywhere vs. SEC’s historical “McDonald’s bag” model.

Shrinking talent pool (U.S. fertility rate 1.57, high school enrollment drop ≈6% by 2031, fewer elite athletes) favors richest schools; Big Ten’s scale makes it harder for others to compete.

Historical foundation: Big Ten’s 303 NCAA/FBS titles; dynasty in wrestling, and other sports where champonship trophies are being hoisted up, along with Jim Delany’s expansions created self-reinforcing cycle.

Recruiting Models: Density vs. Reach

The below data is from @B1OBEY0ND . He has the research.

SEC: Regional talent monopoly (78–82% in-footprint overall; 85–90% for top-100 recruits); dense Southern pipelines (TX/GA/FL/LA/AL).

Big Ten: National talent aggregator (45–55% out-of-footprint overall; 55–65% for top-100); leverages expansion (CA, TX/FL pipelines, DMV, Polynesian) + NIL/portal + brand; signs 4–6�� more elite out-of-footprint players.

Result: SEC fishes in a big lake; Big Ten fishes in an ocean - structural gap widening.

Broader College Sports Context Reinforcing Divergence

Big Ten’s 2025-26 “triple crown” (football, men’s & women’s basketball with three different schools) + dominance in wrestling, gymnastics, soccer (University of Washington) hockey, volleyball, lacrosse, etc., reflects multi-sport excellence funded by resources, not fluke.

NIL/transfer portal + revenue sharing expose and accelerate pre-existing advantages; Big Ten rotates national contenders across programs/sports.

Legal/governance shifts (antitrust scrutiny, consent decrees, potential collective bargaining) favor schools that can operate in a true free-market model - Big Ten’s diversified national footprint and wealth position it better than SEC’s regional model.

Long-term trajectory: Big Ten aims to make the national exposure, national footprint dominate college sports on/off the field.

In the end, the SEC, decades ago, chose sports first and regionality in recent years. The Big Ten, decades ago, chose academics and research and then sports. When McDonald's bags were no longer competitive against a check with 6 zeros on it and a number listed before the 6 zeros, the SEC way of doing things became obsolete and the owners of major corportions in the United States showed up with B's attached to their names.

The SEC and Big Ten are drifting apart simply due to natural evolution.

[matt reding @aMAIZEingBLUE]

@DawnDavenportTN I bleed maize and blue and the rest of the big ten can suck it

[Front Office Sports @FOS]

Michigan's athletic department budget is one of the highest in the country.

It's men's basketball program spent just $14.4M, ranking 26th in the country, a fraction of UConn's $21.6M budget. But it was the Wolverines who cut the net down last night.

By @achristovichh ⬇️

[Barrett - Taco Bell Propogandist @GoBlue_TACOS]

UConn averaged 18 fouls per game. They were severely undersized against Illinois and committed 21 fouls in the Final Four. Not a peep from anyone about fouls that game though. They were severely undersized against Michigan and committed 22 fouls last night. This is who UConn is.

[matt reding @aMAIZEingBLUE]

@SteveP598558 @matthewwinick Oh know stevep5364747383847488374747838385858483747575848374 has spoken

[matt reding @aMAIZEingBLUE]

@RowdyPurdue You'll never understand because you don't see what the rest of the world sees.
https://t.co/p4Z6jvxWcI

[matt reding @aMAIZEingBLUE]

@secnumbersguy FL, TX, Bama, Vandy and After today UT will have all lost to Big Ten schools in this tournament...not sure if would pound my chest about SEC superiority in this bracket...and also kinda wierd to trumpet football dominance at this point in time when the Big Ten has the last 3 NCs

[matt reding @aMAIZEingBLUE]

@WolverineCorner I think for them to win they will need to make 20+ threes....they won't stop us from scoring if we dont try and shoot with them and just stay the course we pull away unless they get 60 or more points from 3

[matt reding @aMAIZEingBLUE]

@ClayTravis Of course the University has to do it's own internal investigation, which should conclude by the 1st week of April, possibly sooner depending on results of the.........uh investigation

[matt reding @aMAIZEingBLUE]

@deion_ali2 @WolverineCorner Ok maybe not live on the bench but he averaged 17mpg Tschetter gets 13mpg..point is he has definitely regressed

[matt reding @aMAIZEingBLUE]

@JBOSDad @WolverineCorner Johnson...has become a defensive liability...went from an eraser to everyone he guards scores

[matt reding @aMAIZEingBLUE]

@sbell021

[matt reding @aMAIZEingBLUE]

@WolverineCorner There was no doubt what the call was gonna be...all night every 50/50 call went to Duke....yax gets a travel called yet boozer does the same and it ends up in points, FT given with .08 left on a loose ball...never happens...shooting foul awarded with the ball at his waist bs