What is the Professional Identity of Radiographers & Technologists in Nuclear Medicine? Volunteers wanted to take part in a research project.
The interview will take about an hour via webcam.
Get in touch via @amcheetham
For more details: https://t.co/MZvyf9rgkL
@alrightPET@ArumParthipun@josephobrien200 As someone said to me the other day. If you aren't evaluating your images, and if you don't have the freedom to use your professional judgment to decide what to do next, then you're a "button-pusher".
And trust me, I ain't no "button-pusher"!
@josephobrien200@ArumParthipun At King's, we get our tech or rad applicants to evaluate about 6 different imaging studies for either clinical or technical queries. They're usually given 10 minutes to review them, just before they go into the interview.
I am sharing this letter, (with the permission of the family), setting out how many people have been helped by organ donation following the sudden death of their son.
Please sign up to the organ donation register.
The Galton Machine shows order from randomness. Each ball bounces left or right at random, 12 times, but together where they fall can be predicted - the normal distribution. This one made by: https://t.co/oI9wOGq7nG
@ArumParthipun Though that then leaves the question of why the median dose remained constant, though it might be that only a few techs are doing PET, and so they need to think about rotating staff.
Interesting data - not sure how we find out why the max dose a technologist receives is going up, but the median dose remains the same. https://t.co/LUP8zPVGBL
May #19: Maintaining safety: Many more nuclear med exams, but average technologist radiation exposure relatively constant (2 mSv), although max exposure is increasing. https://t.co/lzyb4wHIZM @radiology_rsna#NucMed#RadPhys
@ArumParthipun The authors did postulate that as a possible reason, but because they didn't have the data to prove it. It would certainly be worth looking at.
@AdamIanKing As a committed Christian, I presume you follow the biblical requirements not to eat bacon? Or are you more of a pick and mix your bigotry type of Christian?
Sorry but disagree - having reported the CT, you then have to effectively communicate that info - and as the song goes "a picture says a thousand words" https://t.co/9f2IwB2yo9
Rule 80 / / Ignore 3D recons
No self-respecting radiologist would ever use them for primary diagnosis. And, no, they aren't interesting or clever either. They are mere pretty baubles to keep the surgeons happy
#RulesofRadiology
You're absolutely right, as my colleague Sara Soares from @KingsCollegeNHS demonstrated at BNMS this year a 3-bed SPECT/CT Tektrotyd is superior to WB https://t.co/3gpH5EXRND
And maybe sometimes we should do a SPECT in the first place, rather than a planar followed by a SPECT when we realise that the planar doesn't answer the question! https://t.co/zVGLntlzul
KingsCollegeNHS is one of the few centres running the apprenticeship scheme for nuclear medicine technologist, and I can certainly say that we wouldn't have been able to convince the Trust management if there was only £12k of funding https://t.co/RKjWTxvWgP